Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Colorado > Denver
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-06-2013, 07:55 AM
 
Location: 0.83 Atmospheres
11,477 posts, read 11,557,632 times
Reputation: 11981

Advertisements

Tax-increment financing proposal pushed for 9th and Colorado property - The Denver Post

It should be a localized property tax based deal. The neighbors are the ones who killed the Wal Mart deal. They should have to cover the cost.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-06-2013, 08:38 AM
 
459 posts, read 807,709 times
Reputation: 731
TIF and other incentives were part of the Walmart proposal as well which is what gave the neighborhood the ability to block the development. Nothing regarding the type of incentives being used has changed much since the first proposal, but since that article was written a new developer was being looked for, so the incentives could change.

IMO a new developer is needed. I was never opposed to walmart but the site plan just did not fit. If we are giving incentives to put a suburban project in an urban area again it shows that DURA hasn't learned from the mistakes it made elsewhere. Under-utilization of the land ensures a renewal of TIF incentives in the future to redevelop it again in a decade or two. Developers do not mind that re-work, but cities should be taking longer term views and try to do it right once rather than subsidizing the development of disposable shopping centers over and over again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2013, 08:44 AM
 
Location: 0.83 Atmospheres
11,477 posts, read 11,557,632 times
Reputation: 11981
Quote:
Originally Posted by robertgoodman View Post
IMO a new developer is needed. I was never opposed to walmart but the site plan just did not fit. If we are giving incentives to put a suburban project in an urban area again it shows that DURA hasn't learned from the mistakes it made elsewhere. Under-utilization of the land ensures a renewal of TIF incentives in the future to redevelop it again in a decade or two. Developers do not mind that re-work, but cities should be taking longer term views and try to do it right once rather than subsidizing the development of disposable shopping centers over and over again.
This is a great point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2013, 01:05 PM
 
2,289 posts, read 2,945,890 times
Reputation: 2286
Developers love to get their politically connected friends to hook them up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2013, 11:29 AM
 
3,490 posts, read 6,099,388 times
Reputation: 5421
If they want to make the area more upscale, Walmart and King S don't really get the job done. They can be in an upscale area, but they can't make the upscale area. It would be wiser to put in a Costco or Sam's club. Those are stores frequented by the very people they are hoping will help redefine the area. I'm not big on using tax dollars, but sometimes an area is in severe need of an overhaul and procrastinating it will only cause the area to worsen. I was scared the housing was going to be section 8 instead of market rate. Paying to overhaul a bad area into section 8 housing (the very definition of what needs an overhaul) would be the ultimate irony for the people living there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Colorado > Denver
Similar Threads
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:25 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top