Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Iowa > Des Moines
 [Register]
Des Moines Dallas, Guthrie, Madison, Polk, and Warren Counties
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-02-2007, 05:27 AM
 
343 posts, read 1,608,364 times
Reputation: 115

Advertisements

What gives? I thought Des Moines was resurging and growing? This new
survey shows it as a shrinking city, with a loss of 2.5% population last 6 years.
Are they wrong or is it true?

City Mayors: Fastest growing US cities 2007

Well, is it dying or growing?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-02-2007, 06:08 AM
 
Location: Des Moines, IA
1,744 posts, read 7,260,609 times
Reputation: 1239
Most of the growth is out in the suburbs, so maybe it doesn't account for that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2007, 09:17 AM
 
Location: Omaha, Ne
884 posts, read 1,034,387 times
Reputation: 119
The metro has a 6 or 7% growth rate. Positive that is and well above the national average. The city may have lost some residents but I wouldn't want to live in the city either. I would like to live in West DM or Clive, however.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2007, 09:18 AM
 
343 posts, read 1,608,364 times
Reputation: 115
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Rhino View Post
Most of the growth is out in the suburbs, so maybe it doesn't account for that.
Generally healthy metro areas grow in city and burbs....not many are suburb growth exclusive. Also, much growth in suburbs of declining cities are just people moving out of the city, like Detroit or Chicago. Anyone know the net
Des Moines metro growth?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2007, 09:24 AM
 
Location: Omaha, Ne
884 posts, read 1,034,387 times
Reputation: 119
Very true, an inner city which cannot expand and grow with population is usually considered unhealthy. Usually the first thing to go is the cities credit rating and the rest of the finances follow. Des Moines made the same mistake St. Louis and Detroit made. Their annexation policies were counterproductive for the cities well being. (I think the state dictated the annexation policy). I don't think Des Moines is really having the same problems though and I think its doing quite well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2007, 09:38 AM
 
459 posts, read 2,228,301 times
Reputation: 422
Quote:
Originally Posted by southwest1230 View Post
Generally healthy metro areas grow in city and burbs....not many are suburb growth exclusive. Also, much growth in suburbs of declining cities are just people moving out of the city, like Detroit or Chicago. Anyone know the net
Des Moines metro growth?
???

I think you menat to say the opposite of what you have stated.

Almost ALL large cities lose population while their suburbs grow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2007, 09:45 AM
 
Location: Omaha, Ne
884 posts, read 1,034,387 times
Reputation: 119
I don't think Omaha has ever had a negative population loss but it's also not surrounded by suburbs thanks to Nebraska annexation laws.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2007, 10:07 AM
 
Location: Chariton, Iowa
681 posts, read 3,036,071 times
Reputation: 457


This is from the Des Moines Register's story on the last Census estimate. For a pretty good discussion of various Iowa cities' growth in general--this thread from absoluteDSM is pretty interesting.

absoluteDSM.com :: View topic - 2006 Iowa Cities Population Estimates

For the record, I disagree with your notion that cities with any loss of population are "unhealthy". From the list you linked to, I see that Minneapolis lost 2.6%, comparable to Des Moines. Would you consider Minneapolis an unhealthy city?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2007, 11:54 AM
 
2,652 posts, read 8,582,247 times
Reputation: 1915
I think they should concentrate growth efforts in areas other than downtown DSM. It is great what they have done, but a $300K+ condo in Des Moines?? Come on, it ain't Chicago or S.F. They should concentrate revamping some of the beautiful areas like Drake, Ingersoll and others. They have done some stuff with the Drake area, but I think it can be better.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2007, 10:57 PM
 
204 posts, read 1,012,939 times
Reputation: 74
Des Moines...losing people? Impossible! It's all propaganda put forth by the pro-Omaha and pro-Cedar Rapids people on this forum. Des Moines is set to surpass Tokyo as the world's largest city by 2030. Why hasn't Des Moines hosted the Olympics, yet?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Iowa > Des Moines
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:13 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top