Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Michigan > Detroit
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-01-2019, 08:34 PM
 
59 posts, read 88,618 times
Reputation: 41

Advertisements

What do you guys think is the future of the QLine? Have heard that they want to expand into Highland Park/Ferndale? then heard that maybe not the QLine, maybe a dedicated line for a bus? What do you guys think?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-02-2019, 05:00 PM
 
Location: Grosse Ile Michigan
30,708 posts, read 79,764,742 times
Reputation: 39453
I have not been on it in a while. but it seems to me it is too slow to be of use to anyone but tourists or other people who have all day to get someplace.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2019, 06:30 AM
 
1,996 posts, read 3,158,204 times
Reputation: 2302
Internet rumors are investors may put a short line on Jefferson Avenue to Belle Isle and Michigan Avenue to the Train Station, but no firm plans have been proposed
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2019, 07:35 AM
 
Location: Ann Arbor MI
2,222 posts, read 2,246,940 times
Reputation: 3174
If it can't have a dedicated lane it might as well be a bus. Buses are cheaper, more flexible and if they are clean and reliable I don't see why people wouldn't ride them instead. Unless as Coldjensens mentioned the real market is tourists
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2019, 08:06 AM
 
Location: Grosse Ile Michigan
30,708 posts, read 79,764,742 times
Reputation: 39453
Quote:
Originally Posted by craig11152 View Post
If it can't have a dedicated lane it might as well be a bus. Buses are cheaper, more flexible and if they are clean and reliable I don't see why people wouldn't ride them instead. Unless as Coldjensens mentioned the real market is tourists
At least busses can change lanes if someone parks a car in front of them. Q line just has to wait.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2019, 09:25 AM
 
Location: Detroit
3,671 posts, read 5,883,465 times
Reputation: 2692
I agree they need dedicated lanes and signal priority if they build any other type of rail, especially in the downtown area which is probably busier on the regular basis then it has ever been in my lifetime and traffic will probably only get worse in the downtown area in the coming years.

Ok, we finally got a new rail line built after decades of only the people mover. But NOW it's time to do it the right way from next time or rail transit in Detroit will never have a fair shot to actually work. When your trying to sell something new, you don't half ass it. Hopefully the new Governor administration gets behind us and grants us the funding we need.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2019, 07:31 AM
 
836 posts, read 850,658 times
Reputation: 740
As a transit buff, the People Mover which was constructed by Mayor Coleman Young was a good start for Detroit, as the People Mover was supposed to supplement a major heavy rail subway system around Detroit and the vicinity during the 1980s. Unfortunately, the suburban gov't's killed what would've been a pretty extensive system. Now, Mayor Duggan has constructed the QLine, which is one of the biggest wastes of taxpayer money because it doesn't connect to any suburbs as well as the blasted speed of the trains. It was a huge mistake constructing that line, as money should've been utilized to purchase new buses as well as spend more of that money on schools, police and fire, and paying off some of Detroit's debt. Mayor Duggan, for the most part has managed the city decently but building the QLine, that light rail needs to be called "Duggans Folly" because it doesn't fully address the need for a major mass transit system. Speaking of Detroit, check out this picture:If only that Detroit was possible for today than the current Detroit, who knows??? One can only imagine!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2019, 08:09 AM
 
1 posts, read 3,206 times
Reputation: 15
They aren’t going to take it to 8 Mile or beyond that because that would require them to either:

A) put a stop in Highland Park

Or

B) take extreme backlash for not putting a stop in Highland Park.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2019, 08:18 AM
 
Location: Grosse Ile Michigan
30,708 posts, read 79,764,742 times
Reputation: 39453
Q line was the brain child of private enterprise, not Duggan. Neither credit nor blame can be assigned to Duggan for the Q line.

the entire concept is the problem. At at grade system is not workable here. At grade systems must travel at the speed limit and obey traffic signals etc. Even giving them priority at the lights (which is not always practical to do) helps only a little. they will still have the issues of cars turning left, gridlock, emergency vehicles and vehicles running the lights. they will still need to slow or stop to make certain the intersection is clear. A light is not a barricade and the risk is too high. If you want to see how often people run red lights in Downtown, go stand at the Michigan Ave/Griswald/ Lafayette intersection for half an hour. When a train with priority approaches the light will suddenly turn red, often out of its normal time pattern. This increases the likelihood of someone running a light.

Elevated or below grade systems are not so limited. They travel over or under intersections and so do not have to stop and do not get hit.

Also no one parks on elevated or below grade lines and it is rare anyone walks out onto the tracks. Now, I see a lot of vehicles parked on the tracks. Often it is emergency vehicles, or utility vehicles like lift trucks. In both cases, the train has to wait for them to move. It is becoming less common for idiots to park on the tracks illegally, but it still happens.

I was on a committee to study light rail options for a City I live in a while back. It was pretty clear from our investigations that at grade light rail is petty worthless. It is always considerably slower than driving. the group I worked with concluded that since elevated or below grade rail was not an option, the proposed system was impractical and we recommended the council not pursue it further. I think they went with dedicated bus lanes on some roads. This improved the bus schedule somewhat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2019, 10:08 AM
 
Location: Ann Arbor MI
2,222 posts, read 2,246,940 times
Reputation: 3174
I feel like an overhead system like the Chicago elevated would make sense. Especially since the People Mover already started the process.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Michigan > Detroit

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top