U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness > Diet and Weight Loss
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-26-2021, 06:25 AM
 
3,447 posts, read 1,108,873 times
Reputation: 1528

Advertisements

Link to the study here:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s415...wscientist.com


People who follow a low-carb diet consume more calories on average than those who follow a low-fat diet, according to a new study, although both diets can result in similar levels of total weight loss.

“There [are] benefits for both of these diets,” says Kevin Hall at the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases in Maryland. “It’s a lot more complicated than a lot of the diet gurus and folks would have you believe.”

Hall and his colleagues studied 20 volunteers who were admitted to a clinic for the duration of the study. Ten were put on a plant-based, low-fat diet for two weeks and the other 10 were placed on an animal-based, ketogenic, low-carb diet. After two weeks on one diet, the participants were swapped to the other diet for a further two weeks.

Participants were free to eat as much as they wanted from whichever diet they were on, and Hall and his team monitored their calorie intake as well as their weight, body fat and insulin levels after meals.

On both diets, volunteers lost between 1 and 2 kilograms, on average, but people on the low-fat diet consumed fewer calories and lost body fat at a higher rate than people who followed the low-carb diet. However, those on the low-carb diet experienced less variability in blood sugar and insulin levels after meals.

Read more: Ketogenic diet may stop migraines by changing the brain’s fuel
“It’s a mixed bag,” says Hall. “If you think that large swings in glucose and insulin are potentially harmful, then the ketogenic diet came out the winner,” he says. “But there are benefits to the low-fat diet – they lost a greater percentage of their weight coming from body fat.”

“Maybe studies like this can help us distinguish between what diets are better targeted to different people,” says Hall. “If you think your insulin surges are particularly harmful, then the ketogenic diet might be for you. If you’re worried about triglyceride [a constituent of fat] levels in your blood going up too high after meals, then clearly the low-fat diet was better.”

David Unwin, a family doctor at Norwood surgery in Southport, UK, points out that two weeks may not be enough time for volunteers to adapt to a ketogenic diet. It will be important to investigate the longer-term effects of both diets, he says.


Whatever dietary option someone chooses, regular feedback from healthcare providers can be important. “In clinical practice, I find it works so well to support people in their dietary choices whilst supplying feedback as to how their metabolic health is progressing,” says Unwin.



Read more: https://www.newscientist.com/article...#ixzz6keyNrV2t

Last edited by nancy thereader; 01-26-2021 at 08:27 AM..
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-26-2021, 01:38 PM
 
Location: Sacramento CA
1,831 posts, read 557,740 times
Reputation: 4197
20 people for 2 weeks. Worthless.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2021, 02:52 PM
 
3,447 posts, read 1,108,873 times
Reputation: 1528
Quote:
Originally Posted by Igor Blevin View Post
20 people for 2 weeks. Worthless.
yet there are many longer studies that show similar results. That there are no clear advantages of low carb vs any other diets.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2021, 09:35 PM
 
8,432 posts, read 11,900,547 times
Reputation: 8090
Why not combine low fat AND low carb in one diet?
AKA Stillman
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2021, 08:59 AM
 
3,447 posts, read 1,108,873 times
Reputation: 1528
Quote:
Originally Posted by jerseygal4u View Post
Why not combine low fat AND low carb in one diet?
AKA Stillman
Sure if that's what works for you then great. That's what you should do. The problem I see with many is that they find a diet that works for them and then claim superiority that their diet is better than all the other diets out there.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness > Diet and Weight Loss
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2021, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top