Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-19-2010, 07:12 PM
 
1,693 posts, read 1,529,915 times
Reputation: 1424

Advertisements

Cost of Fannie And Freddie Keeps Rising - NYTimes.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-19-2010, 11:05 PM
 
12,017 posts, read 14,320,226 times
Reputation: 5981
shouldn't surprise anyone. Another misguided program thanks to the democrats. Wait until you see the unfunded liabilities for medicare....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2010, 10:27 AM
 
Location: Nebraska
188 posts, read 267,767 times
Reputation: 286
Quote:
Originally Posted by chopchop0 View Post
shouldn't surprise anyone. Another misguided program thanks to the democrats. Wait until you see the unfunded liabilities for medicare....
...and social security and medicaid. Cut them all, they make up 80% of our long-term debt obligations. And while we're at it get Fannie and Freddie out of the free market, and let them fail so that home prices can drop and allow for proper homeownership.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2010, 01:25 PM
 
Location: Business ethics is an oxymoron.
2,347 posts, read 3,333,328 times
Reputation: 5382
Quote:
Originally Posted by hskrfan2187 View Post
...and so that home prices can drop and allow for proper homeownership.
Ha! That's a good one and wishful thinking bro. Not likely to happen. The Feds first, second, and third priorities is going to be: keep the prices up and rising....any way they can. I am still not yet ready to bet against one more possible card they might have up their sleeve: LEGISLATE home prices. Regulate them like a utility. Mandate minimum levels (say around June '06 levels) and that no property may be sold for less. There would of course be no UPPER limit. But an absolute impenetrable floor. If someone wishes to buy a house (which there are no shortage of), they WILL pay. A few may kick and scream about it, but the dream will eventually force them into in.

The reason is as simple as it is obvious: more is more. More property and sales taxes. More folks living the equity ATM lifestyle-which in turn employs more and more people....everyone from Chevy dealerships to appraisers to loan underwriters to granite countertop salesmen.

You think Uncle Sugar is going to let THEM suffer so that someone who is priced out of the market can buy?

NOT A FREAKING CHANCE.

The house partygoers outnumber the disgruntled renters by about a 50:1 ratio.

There's really not much more that I can say to todays would-be home buyers that are not able or willing to pony up apart from:

Sucks to be you.

Sorry.

That's just how it is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2010, 01:34 PM
 
12,022 posts, read 11,568,432 times
Reputation: 11136
at the rate the federal government is racking up debt for stimulating the economy with wars, welfare, and public works programs, medicare and social security will be a tiny amount. the total debt will be around 20 trillion dollars next year including the FNM/FRE debt that's backed by the government. since more than 7 trillion dollars has to be refinanced each year, the interest cost can shoot up rapidly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2010, 03:17 PM
 
20,187 posts, read 23,850,642 times
Reputation: 9283
They are nothing... the top three things I would like fixed... Social Security, Medicare, and Government Pensions/Paycheck...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2010, 06:31 PM
 
3,076 posts, read 5,648,872 times
Reputation: 2698
Government will go for the "quick fix" and throw money at the problems and then when everything starts to collapse again they will just blame the free market and the last administration, or someone else for their failed policies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2010, 10:09 PM
 
Location: Nebraska
188 posts, read 267,767 times
Reputation: 286
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeavingMA View Post
Government will go for the "quick fix" and throw money at the problems and then when everything starts to collapse again they will just blame the free market and the last administration, or someone else for their failed policies.
That's pretty much how it goes, and so does the career of a career politician. Heaven forbid they actually take credit for something (even if it's not their fault) and address the problem, because if they did that (BIG GASP) they may not get re-elected. This isn't even a knock on Obama, Democrats, or Republicans. Anybody that can be considered a career politician must perfect the blame game in order to keep their power.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2010, 10:32 PM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,838,702 times
Reputation: 18304
Quote:
Originally Posted by lchoro View Post
at the rate the federal government is racking up debt for stimulating the economy with wars, welfare, and public works programs, medicare and social security will be a tiny amount. the total debt will be around 20 trillion dollars next year including the FNM/FRE debt that's backed by the government. since more than 7 trillion dollars has to be refinanced each year, the interest cost can shoot up rapidly.
Your figure on liability on the three;SS;medicare and medicaid do not jive with the CBO and other experts. At the rate they are growing as to per ceantage of federal revenue by 2040 its estimated that they will consume 16% of the `18% of all revenues from all sources of federal income. That leaves 2% for everyhti9ng lese without massive tax incrases. Both parties recognise these as the giants entitlemnnts that will break the economy if not solved. We had the Braux(D) commision some years ago on SS with no results because it swas a presidental commision like the new one on the deficit. But all agree that SS is by far the easiest to solve.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2010, 09:25 AM
 
Location: WA
5,641 posts, read 24,951,486 times
Reputation: 6574
Here is the take on Fan and Fred...

William McGurn: Obama Should Publicly Criticize Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from the Oval Office - WSJ.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top