Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-23-2010, 12:09 PM
 
3,398 posts, read 5,103,214 times
Reputation: 2422

Advertisements

Why would anyone care what Warren buffet thinks? The super rich won't be affected much no matter what happens. To me his opinion on the matter doesn't matter that much.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-23-2010, 12:15 PM
 
30,894 posts, read 36,937,375 times
Reputation: 34516
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nocontengencies View Post
Why would anyone care what Warren buffet thinks? The super rich won't be affected much no matter what happens. To me his opinion on the matter doesn't matter that much.
t
Good point Although I do think there is some value in listening to someone who isn't going to be helped/hurt no matter what happens. They're more likely to be less emotional and objective about the situation. The hard part is that at his level, it's hard to know whether there is a hidden agenda, and if so, what it is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2010, 12:35 PM
 
8,263 posts, read 12,193,585 times
Reputation: 4801
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vanskills View Post
You were saying....
So let me get this straight.

You claim the U.S. doesn't make anything anymore. When it is demonstrated how silly and easily refuted this claim is by the US having 11 million workers manufacturing things, you are suddenly interested only in employment totals?


Here is from June of this year, via China to Pass US in Manufacturing Output - Editorial Bored

"The US remained the world's biggest manufacturing nation by output last year, but is poised to relinquish this slot in 2011 to China - thus ending a 110-year run as the number one country in factory production.... Last year, the US created 19.9 per cent of world manufacturing output, compared with 18.6 per cent for China, with the US staying ahead despite a steep fall in factory production due to the global recession."


Kinda puts your claim that the U.S. doesn't make anything anymore in perspective doesn't it? We'll be sure to let you know when we are discussing total employees as opposed to whether the US makes anything, Genius.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2010, 05:30 PM
 
9,846 posts, read 22,668,568 times
Reputation: 7738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vanskills View Post
Hey genius..let me tell you something...

Thousands of businesses, HUGE businesses and factories (even Ford plants) have moved overseas and into Mexico to avoid paying taxes and high regulation. Those jobs are never coming back.

America doesnt make things anymore, an economy that doesnt make things is doomed to failure.

But hey keep living in your fairy-land of taxing the rich will make everything better...

P.S. Rich people are NOT stupid, they arent going to simply hand the federal Government their money..

Maybe THOSE particular jobs will never come back, but by creating a good environment to do business, other companies will grow or develop in their place.

Right now as a country I see us as leaving a lot of money laying on the table. We are not at our full potential.

Look at states like Maryland and New York that impose punitive taxes on the wealthy and what do they do? Move to a state like Florida.

The more you push people the more they push back. The more rules you have the more people find a way around them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2010, 05:36 PM
 
9,846 posts, read 22,668,568 times
Reputation: 7738
Quote:
Originally Posted by user_id View Post
The economic problems in the 70's had little to do with the high marginal rates, these rates were in place since the great depression. Furthermore lowering the rates did nothing for the economy, in fact, the economy, at least for the common man, was better in the 50~70's than it was in the 80's to today.

Nice slippery slope, but the US had high marginal rates for 50 years and the US never turned into a socialist, much less, communist state.

In what sense is it theirs? As you get higher and higher on the income scale, one's income starts to be more about what one owns rather than what one does. People should be rewarded for doing, not merely owning.
I don't think the "common man" had it any better. I'd rather live now than then. My parents have plenty of stories to tell from the 1970's with high prices, low wages, crazy inflation, high interest rates, etc.

Lowering rates boomed the economy in the 1980's and quadtripled tax revenues to the government. Government not turning socialist? I'd say they did with the stupid "Great Society" and their housing programs and rules that lead eventually to the housing boom and bust in recent times.

I'd say whatever you earn is yours. I don't think anyone is entitled to your fruits of your labor. And if you say they are, then what pious person or government entity can rightfully say so?? Once you start placing claims on other peoples wealth there is no end to it. Witness the USSR.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2010, 05:48 PM
 
4,483 posts, read 9,287,800 times
Reputation: 5770
Buffet says, "guys like us" should be taxed more. Guys like Warren Buffet are not those making $250,000. Most millionaires are not "guys like Buffet."

If someone with only one billion dollars gave away 99%, he'd have ten million dollars left. That's $10,000,000. A lot of zeros. If the super-rich feel like they have more than their share, they are free to give some away (as Buffet is encouraging billionaires to do).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2010, 07:12 PM
 
8,263 posts, read 12,193,585 times
Reputation: 4801
Quote:
Originally Posted by wanneroo View Post
I don't think the "common man" had it any better. I'd rather live now than then. My parents have plenty of stories to tell from the 1970's with high prices, low wages, crazy inflation, high interest rates, etc.
Woah woah woah! I was almost convinced previous generation had a perfect life. What is this outlying data point?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2010, 12:01 AM
 
9,846 posts, read 22,668,568 times
Reputation: 7738
Quote:
Originally Posted by sll3454 View Post
Buffet says, "guys like us" should be taxed more. Guys like Warren Buffet are not those making $250,000. Most millionaires are not "guys like Buffet."

If someone with only one billion dollars gave away 99%, he'd have ten million dollars left. That's $10,000,000. A lot of zeros. If the super-rich feel like they have more than their share, they are free to give some away (as Buffet is encouraging billionaires to do).
Yeah I'd say if you really want to pay more then send a check to the US government or something else, but don't wag the finger at me and demand I do the same.

There is nothing to stop these people from contributing more.

I think most people would be surprised that many extremely wealthy people drive Ford Explorers and wear regular clothes. In my experience the flashy ones are the trustafarians or hollywood types. And a lot of those flashy people have high incomes and almost no real wealth because they spend every penny they earn on high living.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2010, 06:42 AM
 
13,811 posts, read 27,433,048 times
Reputation: 14250
China has a 25% corporate income tax rate, ours is what, around 39%, so it's hard to believe cutting our corporate tax rate to 25% would spur growth like China. In other words, I don't believe corporate taxes really has much to do with companies leaving the US. Several other countries have corporate tax rates above the US and they are doing much better economically than we are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2010, 06:43 AM
 
8,263 posts, read 12,193,585 times
Reputation: 4801
Quote:
Originally Posted by wanneroo View Post
I think most people would be surprised that many extremely wealthy people drive Ford Explorers and wear regular clothes. In my experience the flashy ones are the trustafarians or hollywood types. And a lot of those flashy people have high incomes and almost no real wealth because they spend every penny they earn on high living.
Definitely agree.

I once had a coworker who drove a newer BMW, wore really expensive sunglasses, etc. but he was the one always calculating whether payday would come before a weekend/holiday or whether it would post to his account before his rent came due on the 1st of the month.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:20 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top