Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-06-2011, 05:32 PM
 
8,263 posts, read 12,193,585 times
Reputation: 4801

Advertisements

Well when two smart cats like you are split among the deflation and inflation camps I've got no choice but to assume middle of the road will happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-06-2011, 05:48 PM
 
Location: South Jordan, Utah
8,182 posts, read 9,208,437 times
Reputation: 3632
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazzlover View Post
We are going to have both inflation and deflation: deflation in real estate and equity markets and rampant inflation in basic commodities and imports.

In other words, the stuff most Americans own is going to deflate and everything they need to buy to live is going to inflate. The perfect economic storm.
I am sure that will be true for many items but I still feel overall we will deflate. Just as Japan did when their demogrphics peaked they saw 5% inflation over the last 20 years but we had 55%.

Quote:
Originally Posted by slackjaw View Post
Well when two smart cats like you are split among the deflation and inflation camps I've got no choice but to assume middle of the road will happen.
That would be nice! Don't hold your breath!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2011, 06:08 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,442,711 times
Reputation: 27720
It doesn't have to be one or the other. Both inflation and deflation can happen at the same time.
We see it right before our eyes..food is rising while housing is falling.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2011, 06:43 PM
 
Location: South Jordan, Utah
8,182 posts, read 9,208,437 times
Reputation: 3632
Quote:
Originally Posted by slackjaw View Post
Good stuff, and easily a thread to itself. I find discussions about ways to measure unemployment fascinating, seems like there is no real right way that doesn't have gaping holes in the logic of it.
Here is Gallups take. Gallup Finds Unemployment at 9.6% in December
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2011, 05:40 PM
 
5,760 posts, read 11,541,357 times
Reputation: 4949
Or maybe quit calling everything "inflation" when one set of prices go up and conversely quit calling everything "deflation" when one set of prices go down?

Some things are in surplus -- housing, for example. Basic Econ sez Surplus = Lower Prices. Whenever the Fed and Banks quit manipulation of the supply and financing, surplus housing is bound to continue to go down.

Some things are in shortage and/or high demand -- energy and food, for example. Basic Econ sez when there is Shortage or High Demand, prices for these items go Up. When the supply of these catch up to the world growth in demand for them, they will quit climbing.

But neither of these are really "inflation" nor "deflation."

Kind of goes back to what this entire thread's unintended sub-theme appears to be. So much mis-information is being attempted to be twisted into meanings and hidden-meanings -- very little of this has any real meaning, anymore.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2011, 07:38 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,152,432 times
Reputation: 21738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philip T View Post
Or maybe quit calling everything "inflation" when one set of prices go up and conversely quit calling everything "deflation" when one set of prices go down?
They have to learn how to distinguish between Currency Inflation, Interest Inflation, Cost Inflation and Wage Inflation.

Wage Inflation is rare. Last time the US saw that was early 1970s and Nixon's solution was a Wage & Price Freeze. Before that, during the Great Depression and FDR's solution was a Wage & Price Freeze (which is how "health insurance" got crow-barred into employee benefits).

Higher wages cause higher prices. I think we can rule that one out.

Interest Inflation affects the price of things tied to interest rates, like housing, autos, throat-warbler mangroves (pronounced luxury yachts) and other big ticket items and certain types of loans.

Basically, way too much money is available and that is because interest rates are way too low. Ideally, mortgages should be around 9%-13% Fixed APR.

0% financing is a joke. The car is $15,000 and they're paying $20,000 which would be like "gifting" Toyota and others $5,000. How is it they can give a $1,500 Rebate, $3,000 "customer loyalty bonus" and a "1,000" "cash-back" or "incentive bonus?"

That's because the sticker price is grotesquely inflated, and that's because of low interest rates.

As a whole country-wide, housing prices are inflated because of low interest rates, but you have to examine each MSA (Metropolitan Statistical Area) independently because of volatility and also within each MSA you have to look at individual zip codes or neighborhoods, because certain actions can render those areas very volatile. For example a downtown neighborhood has rising prices because welfare scum are being evicted and the tenements converted to condos, but the welfare scum are piling up in another neighborhood and the media and realtors had to change the name from Westwood to Westwood and East Westwood because housing prices were falling below the original 1950s market value (and so everyone could easily known where the welfare scum lived).

If anyone is interested, here are:

MSA by Cost of Living
MSA by 2009 Census Estimate
Metro and Micro Areas (this is the definitive work)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Philip T View Post
Some things are in surplus -- housing, for example. Basic Econ sez Surplus = Lower Prices. Whenever the Fed and Banks quit manipulation of the supply and financing, surplus housing is bound to continue to go down.
One of the things I noticed during the housing fiasco was that rents did not appreciably decrease, at least not in the area where I was, which had only a 60%-70% occupancy rate even though the area surrounds a major university.

I did notice the corporate property owners seem to be affected. Several large corporate owned apartment complexes started offering "move-in specials" of $100 security deposit, then later $100 security deposit and first month's rent free, then later $100 security deposit first and last month's rent free etc.

That is a rent price reduction cleverly devised as a marketing scheme. Still, the private property owners took no action. I'm at a loss to understand why, although for this area the majority are "absentee landlords" so maybe that had something to do with it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Philip T View Post
Some things are in shortage and/or high demand -- energy and food, for example. Basic Econ sez when there is Shortage or High Demand, prices for these items go Up. When the supply of these catch up to the world growth in demand for them, they will quit climbing.

But neither of these are really "inflation" nor "deflation."
That's just garden-variety Cost Inflation.

It's more noticeable, or perhaps more painful today than it would have been in the past.

Go back to the Civil War, and you had the [1st] Great Depression [of the 19th Century] with large government spending and that was followed almost immediately by the Civil War with massive government spending so you had inflation of two forms, Cost Inflation because of shortages and then mild Currency Inflation because of the spending.

The price of corn doubled, but it's overall effect was different then than it is now, because then you had corn, canned corn, creamed corn, corn starch, corn flour, corn meal and corn syrup.

Now, you have that, plus corn is used in so many other products, such as ethanol, and then corn starch is used as binder/filler in ready-to-eat, frozen and other prepared foods, and corn syrup is used in beverages and so on, plus corn is used for feed (and it wasn't in the past) so it affects the price of meat, poultry and especially dairy (because many dairy products like cheese, in particular the semi-artificial and artificial cheese use corn syrup and corn starch).

Oil has the same related problems, with so many things tied to oil. Anyway the issue is that in the past, if the price of something rose, you could usually find a substitute, but now that's almost impossible.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Philip T View Post
Kind of goes back to what this entire thread's unintended sub-theme appears to be. So much mis-information is being attempted to be twisted into meanings and hidden-meanings -- very little of this has any real meaning, anymore.
Historically in the US, real inflation (Currency Inflation) has been followed by deflation. There is no situation in the last 200+ years where that has not been true.

The next period of real inflation will occur about 14 years from now, followed by massive deflation about 15 years later.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2011, 08:19 PM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,816,250 times
Reputation: 18304
I thnik one of the things that nade people spend mre tsi years is the latoffs have slowed in most areas and people that are wrokign feeel more stable in their jbs than say the last two eyars. Plus many have really paid down debt and saved more also. The last tweo eyars most have been really hunkered down and using money to better their postion goign forward.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2011, 09:24 PM
 
Location: Conejo Valley, CA
12,460 posts, read 20,078,663 times
Reputation: 4365
As the economy continues to recover, its going to get very funny seeing the doom-gloom club try to spin the position news negatively.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2011, 06:37 AM
 
8,263 posts, read 12,193,585 times
Reputation: 4801
Quote:
Originally Posted by user_id View Post
As the economy continues to recover, its going to get very funny seeing the doom-gloom club try to spin the position news negatively.
It already is. I saw a thread yesterday (I think in the political name calling forum) about the latest employment numbers that was a great read.

Apparently every single job added is someone making $8/hour, any drop in applications for unemployment is because of people giving up, and unemployment rate going down is government cooking the books.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2011, 11:51 AM
 
Location: South Jordan, Utah
8,182 posts, read 9,208,437 times
Reputation: 3632
Quote:
Originally Posted by slackjaw View Post
It already is. I saw a thread yesterday (I think in the political name calling forum) about the latest employment numbers that was a great read.

Apparently every single job added is someone making $8/hour, any drop in applications for unemployment is because of people giving up, and unemployment rate going down is government cooking the books.
Actually some of it is not spin, it is taken directly from the BLS report. it is amazing what you can find when you read the source and not just the headlines or CNBC spin.

Household Survey (000s) November December Change
Civilian noninstitutional population (16 and over) 238,715 238,889 174
Civilian labor force 153,950 153,690 -260
Employed 138,909 139,206 297
Unemployed 15,041 14,485 -556
Participation Rate 64.49% 64.34% -0.16%
Unemployment Rate 9.77% 9.42% -0.35%

(sorry about the formatting see doc below)

Starting next month they are going to start doing quarterly revisions on the birth/death model. This may help to get the numbers a little more correct. As it is now if a survey participating company had 50 employees and they go out of business and no longer report, the BLS assumes all 50 employees immediately find new employment so they don't reduce the job numbers by those failures. Then once a year (soon quarterly) they make an adjustment to the numbers. This is why last Feb we saw an 800k job loss factored in.

Gallup has been doing more real time employment surveys, they have some interesting conclusions. http://www.gallup.com/poll/145478/Gallup-Finds-Unemployment-December.aspx
Attached Files
File Type: pdf Household Survey.pdf (49.9 KB, 166 views)

Last edited by hilgi; 01-08-2011 at 12:02 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top