Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-18-2011, 10:36 AM
 
45,580 posts, read 27,172,269 times
Reputation: 23887

Advertisements

Here is an excel sheet from the White House that shows Federal Tax Receipts and Federal spending as a percentage of GDP.

Table 1.2—Summary of Receipts, Outlays, and Surpluses or Deficits (-) as Percentages of GDP: 1930–2016

Here's what to take from this...

1- Since 1940, taxes received as a percentage of GDP has remained between 15% and 20%. This is regardless of the tax rate - whether it's Carter's 70% rate or Reagan's 28% rate - it didn't matter. So when the economy is booming, there is more tax money coming in because the GDP is larger. When the economy shrinks, so does government income due to tax income. What this says is that taxing the rich won't matter in paying down the debt.

2- Note the Surplus or Deficit column. Two things to note.
a) The amount of negative years versus positive years.
b) The large jump post 2009.

What this says is that government is continuously spending beyond the money it receives. CONTINUOUSLY.

The solution to the debt and deficits is simple.
  • Government needs to spend within it's means.
  • Government needs to do what it can to boost the economy in order to increase the amount it receives - and then use extra money to pay down debt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-18-2011, 02:18 PM
 
Location: West Orange, NJ
12,546 posts, read 21,400,123 times
Reputation: 3730
a lot has changed over time besides just the income tax RATE. you forget all the deductions that have been added, and credits. you can't compare a rate from today to a rate from 25 years ago without also evaluating how deductions and credits are/were different from each period to come to a logical conclusion on differences in receipts
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:53 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top