
08-26-2011, 09:52 AM
|
|
|
19,346 posts, read 17,013,088 times
Reputation: 7519
|
|
|

08-26-2011, 09:55 AM
|
|
|
Location: The Triad (NC)
31,413 posts, read 70,056,849 times
Reputation: 37510
|
|
open up that link.
capture a quote or few sentences you think pertinent.
add a statement in your own words.
hth
|

08-26-2011, 09:58 AM
|
|
|
19,346 posts, read 17,013,088 times
Reputation: 7519
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrRational
open up that link.
capture a quote or few sentences you think pertinent.
add a statement in your own words.
hth
|
For what? It speaks for itself. I don't need posting lessons. If you are not interested, move on and keep your trap shut.
Last edited by gwynedd1; 08-26-2011 at 10:22 AM..
|

08-26-2011, 11:05 AM
|
|
|
5,413 posts, read 10,360,535 times
Reputation: 4498
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrRational
open up that link.
capture a quote or few sentences you think pertinent.
add a statement in your own words.
hth
|
Open the Yellow Pages.
Look under Psychotherapists
Schedule an appointment.
Tell the Doc your presenting problem is folks in your support group are telling you that you may have "control issues."
pdt

|

08-26-2011, 04:47 PM
|
|
|
8,265 posts, read 11,227,761 times
Reputation: 4788
|
|
I think it is a fair request for someone starting a thread to at least quote a section of the meaningful content of their post, and even better a brief summary their own opinion on the subject in their initial post.
Tightwad would be proud.
|

08-26-2011, 05:20 PM
|
|
|
19,346 posts, read 17,013,088 times
Reputation: 7519
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by slackjaw
I think it is a fair request for someone starting a thread to at least quote a section of the meaningful content of their post, and even better a brief summary their own opinion on the subject in their initial post.
Tightwad would be proud.
|
And here you are not having any opinion relevant to the thread at all just like your buddy, a name I prefer to pronounce in its native dialect of pig latin, "analrash" . The subject line says it all, and is best emphasized with brevity. It implies that nothing need be said because it says volumes that the financiers did it all over again, just like last time. But then again, you like the extra material even though most people like to get out the slack.
|

08-26-2011, 07:11 PM
|
|
|
8,265 posts, read 11,227,761 times
Reputation: 4788
|
|
Wow if you put as much effort into creating a thread post as you do being aggressively hyper-defensive this thread would be a literary treat!
|

08-27-2011, 11:23 AM
|
|
|
Location: Ohio
22,798 posts, read 16,024,403 times
Reputation: 19289
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwynedd1
And here you are not having any opinion relevant to the thread at all just like your buddy...
|
Well, we're kind of busy. We don't have time to watch videos by charlatan hucksters hawking gold or apocalyptic survival gear, or to read idiotic nonsense by Hill-Jack News or Fat Fred's Blog.
So Tiffany is making profits. Big deal. Emery Industries turned a profit every single quarter from January 1925 to December 1945, and yes that includes an "housing bubble," two minor recessions and a major depression. P&G did the same. So did Sun Chemical. So did dozens of other companies who never lost a single a dime during the Great Depression.
So, what's your point?
|

08-29-2011, 10:39 AM
|
|
|
19,346 posts, read 17,013,088 times
Reputation: 7519
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea
Well, we're kind of busy. We don't have time to watch videos by charlatan hucksters hawking gold or apocalyptic survival gear, or to read idiotic nonsense by Hill-Jack News or Fat Fred's Blog.
|
What the hell are you talking about? Just making up BS. I have never once posted anything like that. Thanks for another hostile introduction that is typical of any rabid cur losing its mind.
Quote:
So Tiffany is making profits. Big deal. Emery Industries turned a profit every single quarter from January 1925 to December 1945, and yes that includes an "housing bubble," two minor recessions and a major depression. P&G did the same. So did Sun Chemical. So did dozens of other companies who never lost a single a dime during the Great Depression.
So, what's your point?
|
The big deal is that wealth is not being merely destroyed as some would have us believe. Its being transfered. The system supports sucking money away from people who don't have deep pockets to ride this out.
I doubt you would ever get the point. "charlatan hucksters hawking gold"
Don't you wish you were swindled like I was since I got in years ago. I also got the point before this since I also made money on some high end retail.
|

08-29-2011, 11:29 AM
|
|
|
19,346 posts, read 17,013,088 times
Reputation: 7519
|
|
Oh, now I see. Mircea has noticed that I have posted in the self sufficiency forum. This qualifies me as a "lunatic".
Point of fact. If you actually read my posts, it has typically been on the topic of wild food. This is because I consider it both frugal and gourmet, having nothing to do with "survival" per se. This further demonstrates your lack of diligence. How ironic that much of the content on the religious forum has be debunking the coming of the apocalypses since I argue it is was all in regard to the first century AD. Thus I am opposed to apocalyptic fear mongering.
So that makes you just another dumbshyt speculator who got it wrong.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|