I have always been a skeptic to many things (Y2K etc.)...
BUT being of the Asian blood, I've always liked gold, and would agree that in centuries past, gold is the world currencies (from India to China, to Europe & Arabian world & Africa... etc.) and is a traded & honored system (way of currency / product eg. like jewelry etc.) for many merchants... there will be nothing wrong in holding on to gold for the "JIC".
Now with the proven history of how paper money based upon "trust" (from the government promising its value) can and have failed us (like Japanese Banana note, German money in WW2,
North Korean redenominate its currency...) and if EUROPE were to do away with EURO.... then what "trust" do we have in what the modern society knows of as a currency in the "paper money"???
What good is "paper money"???
**You cannot eat it***
When this "paper money" cannot buy your "basic needs" (food, water, shelter, medicine etc.)??? Then this "paper money" may be only useful / worth for only toilet needs????
Brings us back to "food".
Food can be used also as a trading currency... dated back to centuries because FOOD is a necessity.
Say if you have food but needed medicine... you can use food in trade for medicine... the example is endless.
Food is for survival, plain & simple, you NEED it.
The only reason you may have need for the modern "paper money" is because right now with the government guaranteeing its value, one can use that value to buy food.
(**Doesn't help that there may be a second downgrade to the US banks...** another notch to Obama's belt for his achievement for sure)
Anyone should know downgrading the credit worth (hence trust) of a country is NO JOKING matter...
Say 1 euro buys you a loaf of bread today... but what happen if tomorrow with hyper inflation (the trust is no longer there) when that loaf of bread will be costing you 1000 euro??? What is that "paper money" euro worth then??? And if it keeps depreciating??? What then?
Thus, I have done what my family use to do... I like to hoard food too, its natural thing to do (squirrels does it for winter, so why not I, I have that room..).
The worst case scenario may or may not even happen...
BUT no one can deny "prevention" is better than "having to cure" one when they are already sick...
If "prevention" is better, why not in preparation for the "JIC"???
Or why buy life insurance but for the "JIC"???
Its absolutely legal and with the rights of freedom should anyone chooses to prepare for that worst case scenario.
I'd say...

GOOD for the ones prepared than the ones NOT.