U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Covid-19 Information Page
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-26-2012, 09:42 AM
 
5,931 posts, read 5,605,478 times
Reputation: 6892

Advertisements

Stealing from the poor... Mike Shedlock provides an excellent summary of the US's bank bailout plan:
To stimulate lending, the bailout plan will attempt to recapitalize banks. The method of recapitalization is best described as robbing Taxpayer Pete to pay Wall Street Paul. In essence, money is taken from the poor (via taxes, printing, and weakening of the dollar) and given to the wealthy so the wealthy supposedly will have enough money to lend back (at interest) to those who have just been robbed.
The scale of corruption and the ease with which this has taken place internationally is staggering. It makes it hard to hold onto any illusions we might have about the society in which we live.


That's economy and society of absurd we are supposed to worship as the best under the Sun. If that's the best human kind can come up with, it's really depressing.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-27-2012, 07:54 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles area
14,017 posts, read 18,857,425 times
Reputation: 32438
What is missing from the OP is any mention of the fact that the bailout money has been repaid by most of the banks, with interest. The bailout was a loan not a gift; no one was robbed.

One can still argue that the bailout was a mistake and that the megabanks should have been allowed to fail, but that argument, to be legitimate, would have to acknowledge and take into account what I said in my first paragraph above. It would also have to acknowledge and discuss the possible repercussions to the common citizen of the chaos and turmoil which would have resulted from such failure.

This is a difficult thing to decide because it's a "what if" question (What would have happened if the megabanks had been allowed to fail?) and so by its nature it's speculative and conjectural. I don't know personally if the bank bailout was a good move or not, but the quoted statement as well as the OP's comments seem to be long on emotion and short on rational, dispassionate analysis.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2021, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top