Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-09-2012, 05:11 PM
 
117 posts, read 302,852 times
Reputation: 32

Advertisements

There's an economics principle of equilibrium, an example of which is when one previously closed cash register opens, people fill up that line till all of the lines are even. What if people stood in the longest line because the cashier offered 30% off of their groceries if they went stayed in that line (in other words, no equilibrium) and the newly-opened cash register would remain empty? Assuming there's no incentive (other than you get fired if no one goes to your cash register), what would be the long-term effects of such a decision by the cashier? I'm just wondering .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-09-2012, 05:18 PM
 
24,488 posts, read 41,146,617 times
Reputation: 12920
Those who value time more than the saving will have an express checkout. I don't think that the other cashier would remain empty. Especially if someone is only spending a few $$.

What would likely occur is that people would start buying in bulk to the point where the 30% in savings is greater than the time required to wait. So you'll have two lines. One line of people buying a large quantity of items at a 30% discount and a line of people purchasing a low quantity items and paying a few bucks more than had they gone to the other line.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2012, 05:43 PM
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
14,129 posts, read 31,257,288 times
Reputation: 6920
Quote:
Originally Posted by irvparkrez11 View Post
There's an economics principle of equilibrium, an example of which is when one previously closed cash register opens, people fill up that line till all of the lines are even. What if people stood in the longest line because the cashier offered 30% off of their groceries if they went stayed in that line (in other words, no equilibrium) and the newly-opened cash register would remain empty? Assuming there's no incentive (other than you get fired if no one goes to your cash register), what would be the long-term effects of such a decision by the cashier? I'm just wondering .
Homework assignment in Econ 1 due tomorrow?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2012, 06:49 PM
 
Location: North of Canada, but not the Arctic
21,142 posts, read 19,722,567 times
Reputation: 25673
I think everyone would go to the "30% off line"...unless they didn't want their ice cream to melt.

Now if it were only 5 or 10%, I think less people would be willing to stand in a long line. But 30% is a lot. That could be $60+ for some people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2012, 07:10 PM
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
14,129 posts, read 31,257,288 times
Reputation: 6920
If there was anything to this I'm sure stores would have an arrangement where you could pay more for a shorter wait.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2012, 07:58 PM
 
Location: Philaburbia
41,965 posts, read 75,205,836 times
Reputation: 66925
Oh, pick me. If there's a line that's long and effed up I'm sure to be in it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2012, 08:02 PM
 
269 posts, read 296,018 times
Reputation: 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by irvparkrez11 View Post
There's an economics principle of equilibrium, an example of which is when one previously closed cash register opens, people fill up that line till all of the lines are even. What if people stood in the longest line because the cashier offered 30% off of their groceries if they went stayed in that line (in other words, no equilibrium) and the newly-opened cash register would remain empty? Assuming there's no incentive (other than you get fired if no one goes to your cash register), what would be the long-term effects of such a decision by the cashier? I'm just wondering .
You'd have more people complaining that the store didn't open up enough lanes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2012, 08:23 PM
 
117 posts, read 302,852 times
Reputation: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by CAVA1990 View Post
Homework assignment in Econ 1 due tomorrow?
No, I'm just curious.

Thanks for your answers! What about if there was a disincentive for the cashier who doesn't make as much money - that is, the cashier who earns less money is fired. Would the regular cashier initiate discount wars with the cashier who has offered 30% off?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2012, 10:56 PM
 
24,488 posts, read 41,146,617 times
Reputation: 12920
Quote:
Originally Posted by irvparkrez11 View Post
No, I'm just curious.

Thanks for your answers! What about if there was a disincentive for the cashier who doesn't make as much money - that is, the cashier who earns less money is fired. Would the regular cashier initiate discount wars with the cashier who has offered 30% off?
Yes. It would essentially mimic gas stations where stations in a certain area are generally the same price (yes, I know there are exceptions).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2012, 11:08 PM
 
Location: Vallejo
21,867 posts, read 25,154,836 times
Reputation: 19084
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJBest View Post
Those who value time more than the saving will have an express checkout. I don't think that the other cashier would remain empty. Especially if someone is only spending a few $$.

What would likely occur is that people would start buying in bulk to the point where the 30% in savings is greater than the time required to wait. So you'll have two lines. One line of people buying a large quantity of items at a 30% discount and a line of people purchasing a low quantity items and paying a few bucks more than had they gone to the other line.
The store would just go broke. Margin on a grocery store isn't 30%, so the only way they could offer 30% off would be to mark up prices by say 25%. Basically, it's a convenience store at that point or a 5% discount store for the rent-seekers. Most people would just go to another store.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:35 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top