Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-22-2013, 10:27 AM
 
917 posts, read 2,005,034 times
Reputation: 723

Advertisements

Middle I guess? Sounds like you're doing well for yourself.

You're very fortunate.

Last edited by hershey48; 02-22-2013 at 10:39 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-22-2013, 11:02 AM
 
Location: Ontario, NY
3,516 posts, read 7,781,563 times
Reputation: 4287
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamish Forbes View Post
On the other hand, a "Rockefeller" who loses all of his money will never be considered lower class, no matter how poor financially, because he will have so much cultural capital -- education, travel, languages, cultural knowledge, friends in high places, and so forth.
I disagree. Money buys respect, not education, knowledge, or life experiences. Try walking into a diner and get a free meal just because you were wealthy once in your life. Unless you were once famous or some other former celebrity, chances are you would leave hungry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2013, 11:40 AM
 
2,991 posts, read 4,288,616 times
Reputation: 4270
Quote:
Originally Posted by TechGromit View Post
I disagree. Money buys respect, not education, knowledge, or life experiences. Try walking into a diner and get a free meal just because you were wealthy once in your life. Unless you were once famous or some other former celebrity, chances are you would leave hungry.
Money buys goods and services. Money does not buy respect, except among lower-class people, for example in inner-city Baltimore.

Have you seen the old movie "High Society?" It's pretty good -- has Louis Armstrong, Bing Crosby, Grace Kelly, and Frank Sinatra. During the filming of the movie, the actor Frank Sinatra (the real Frank, not his character on the screen) supposedly fell in love with the actress Grace Kelly (not her character). But Grace wouldn't have anything to do with Frank, because she supposedly thought he was little more than white trash with a lot of money and a good voice, due to his potty mouth and his alleged association with organized crime. This illustrated how complicated social class can be.

But here, I think, is a better question: if someone is happy with his life, why would he care what class he belongs to? Suppose Frank really was WT with money -- he no doubt had a fine time and a very good life. But he wasn't necessarily upper class, despite being very rich (again, so what?).

And then there's the Pope. He makes, what, 30K per year? Would anybody seriously say that he was lower-middle class rather than upper class? When I was working, I made a lot more money than the Governor of North Carolina (my state). Would any serious person say that I was higher in social class than he?

It's complicated . . .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2013, 11:41 AM
 
Location: Central Massachusetts
6,594 posts, read 7,087,216 times
Reputation: 9332
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamish Forbes View Post
Money buys goods and services. Money does not buy respect, except among lower-class people, for example in inner-city Baltimore.

Have you seen the old movie "High Society?" It's pretty good -- has Louis Armstrong, Bing Crosby, Grace Kelly, and Frank Sinatra. During the filming of the movie, the actor Frank Sinatra (the real Frank, not his character on the screen) supposedly fell in love with the actress Grace Kelly (not her character). But Grace wouldn't have anything to do with Frank, because she supposedly thought he was little more than white trash with a lot of money and a good voice, due to his potty mouth and his alleged association with organized crime. This illustrated how complicated social class can be.

But here, I think, is a better question: if someone is happy with his life, why would he care what class he belongs to? Suppose Frank really was WT with money -- he no doubt had a fine time and a very good life. But he wasn't necessarily upper class, despite being very rich (again, so what?).

And then there's the Pope. He makes, what, 30K per year? Would anybody seriously say that he was lower-middle class rather than upper class? When I was working, I made a lot more than the Governor of North Carolina (my state). Would any serious person say that I was higher in social class than he?

It's complicated . . .
Mr Forbes you are higher class than the Gov of NC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2013, 11:44 AM
 
2,991 posts, read 4,288,616 times
Reputation: 4270
Quote:
Originally Posted by golfingduo View Post
Mr Forbes you are higher class than the Gov of NC.
Good one! Thanks . . . .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2013, 12:29 PM
 
927 posts, read 2,466,410 times
Reputation: 488
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamish Forbes View Post
You didn't mention your occupation or level of education.
I work in a manager role as a sales & marketing guy for a music venue. I have my undergrad from a small state school in Minnesota. I have no plans to get a MBA or masters.

Director levels in my position will make between $80k - $100k and VPs will make around $150k... so I could become upper middle class someday.

In addition, if I keep investing $1500k/month into the market, get an average of a 9% return and never get a raise in the next 30 years (which is unlikely), I'll have around 2 million dollars saved, all done on $65k... that would define me as rich, right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2013, 01:33 PM
 
2,991 posts, read 4,288,616 times
Reputation: 4270
yoyoma -- I think that you are doing fine! Comfortably middle class now, and probably headed for upper middle, in my opinion (which is just another opinion, of course).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2013, 02:02 PM
 
Location: Ontario, NY
3,516 posts, read 7,781,563 times
Reputation: 4287
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamish Forbes View Post
During the filming of the movie, the actor Frank Sinatra (the real Frank, not his character on the screen) supposedly fell in love with the actress Grace Kelly (not her character). But Grace wouldn't have anything to do with Frank, because she supposedly thought he was little more than white trash with a lot of money and a good voice, due to his potty mouth and his alleged association with organized crime. This illustrated how complicated social class can be.
That movie was made in 1956, I don't think something that happened over 50 years is a good comparison to today's society. Sure there are stuck up snobs that believe in rigid social classes, but they are a minority.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamish Forbes View Post
Money buys goods and services.
Your right, and if I want to make money from you, I'm going to treat you well to get some of it. Sure I may be thinking what a jerk, but I'm not going to say it out loud or treat you that way, any more than I'm going to use racial slurs based on your race or sexual orientation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamish Forbes View Post
And then there's the Pope. He makes, what, 30K per year? Would anybody seriously say that he was lower-middle class rather than upper class?
Poor example. The pope lives in a city he pretty much controls. With libraries, museums of priceless artwork, servants, free housing, free food, clothing, and even his own security forces. While he certainly doesn't own Vatican city he wields considerable power over it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamish Forbes View Post
When I was working, I made a lot more money than the Governor of North Carolina (my state). Would any serious person say that I was higher in social class than he?
Same situation, even though the Governor of North Carolina doesn't own the state, he has considerable power while in office. He has access to 10,000 national guard troops among other resources in the state. Money is power, but you can have power without money too.

And in the end that's what social class are, how much power you have in society. While in theory we are all equal in this country, you have more money to hire better lawyers, than I could so you have more power than me. Being wealthy isn't an automatic get out of jail free card, but it certainly helps.

Last edited by TechGromit; 02-22-2013 at 02:25 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2013, 02:26 PM
 
30,896 posts, read 36,949,177 times
Reputation: 34521
Quote:
Originally Posted by yoyoma02 View Post
I was having a discussion with my roommate last night on what the middle class looks like. I tend to think of myself as middle class, but I wanted to get everyone opinions on it...

I make $65k/year
I'm 29, male
I have no debt
I rent a high-end apartment in Los Angeles
I save about $1500 - $2000 a month (retirement and mutual funds)
I drive a paid for 2009 Toyota with 46000 miles on it.
I am single, no dependents, no kids
I have a networth of about $150k
I work a full-time job, Monday - Friday
I don't feel strapped for cash, but I'm relativity conservative with my money

What am I? Lower class? Middle Class? Upper Middle Class? If I continue saving like I have been... I will be on my way to Upper Middle Class in the next 10 years, correct?
Yes, I'd say you're middle class on the way to upper middle, provided you are able to keep your job and keep up your savings rate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2013, 02:27 PM
 
1,855 posts, read 3,609,385 times
Reputation: 2151
Quote:
Originally Posted by yoyoma02 View Post
...In addition, if I keep investing $1500k/month into the market, get an average of a 9% return and never get a raise in the next 30 years (which is unlikely), I'll have around 2 million dollars saved, all done on $65k... that would define me as rich, right?
You won't qualify as rich on just two mil after 30 years thanks to inflation. But you won't be eating dog food either. Or living in a van down by the river. Unless that's what floats your boat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top