Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-30-2014, 01:43 AM
 
Location: Vallejo
21,700 posts, read 24,907,238 times
Reputation: 18970

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by stan4 View Post
Then they are all tax deductible.
Yup.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-30-2014, 07:21 AM
 
Location: Forests of Maine
37,311 posts, read 61,111,691 times
Reputation: 30233
Quote:
Originally Posted by SOON2BNSURPRISE View Post
I think we should pay everyone $80 an hour. In my area with $80 an hour the average family can live a middle class lifestyle. They can own a home, drive a modest newer car, maybe have an occasional vacation, go out to eat. Yup I am thinking that everyone in my part of the nation should be paid $80 an hour.

What do you all think?
And folks who get $600/month from SS will simply live in cardboard boxes?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-30-2014, 10:32 AM
 
3,792 posts, read 2,372,149 times
Reputation: 768
Quote:
Originally Posted by Supposn View Post
Contrarian Econ, can you explain what is and how do we determine the “top as a fraction” and the “monetary base”? How can we calculate what would be USA’s GDP if we had full employment?

Respectfully, Supposn
Take the top 50 or so total compensation packages average them and set the minimum wage as a fraction of that or higher.

The Fed has assets on its books that balance the money in circulation. If those assets do a 4X then the minimum wage should do a 4X as well. Or more.

Take US GDP. It is off a bit from where it should be if everyone had a job and was working. Do some math, take a guess. It shouldn't be that hard. Why I want to use full employment GDP is to not chase contracting GDP with contracting employment. Debt stays the same GDP goes down debt remains the same debt to GDP goes up temporarily. Adjusting GDP for full employment means that you don't chase recessions making them worse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-30-2014, 10:34 AM
 
3,792 posts, read 2,372,149 times
Reputation: 768
Quote:
Originally Posted by Submariner View Post
And folks who get $600/month from SS will simply live in cardboard boxes?
No they will start getting about $600 times 80/7 equals $6,800 a month.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-30-2014, 03:41 PM
 
Location: Maui County, HI
4,131 posts, read 7,420,978 times
Reputation: 3391
Quote:
Originally Posted by stan4 View Post
Then they are all tax deductible.
LOL no. Not unless you're a private contractor, and even only if your home is your office.

Even if they were tax deductible, what is your point?

Last edited by winkosmosis; 04-30-2014 at 03:50 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-30-2014, 03:47 PM
 
Location: Maui County, HI
4,131 posts, read 7,420,978 times
Reputation: 3391
Quote:
Originally Posted by mayorofnyc View Post
Was there consumer demand for an iPhone before the iPhone was invented? Where was the consumer demand for high-speed internet or cable television prior to their creation? Demand is always driven by production. Entrepreneurs introduce a good or service to the marketplace and if consumers like it, they buy it. "Build it and they will come".



Ok...so what good is demand if there aren't anything on the shelves? Besides where do consumers get the money to buy stuff? Does it fall from the heavens? Does the tooth fairy slip spending money under your pillow while you're asleep? In the real world, most people have to earn their money working at a job or doing some other productive activity. The production has to come first.




One of the major problems with our economy is that there are too many people working at jobs that should've never been created. We have a $700+ billion dollar trade deficit and instead of building factories, we're building Super Wal Marts and overpriced McMansions. Instead of growing and employing people in the manufacturing sector we would rather feed our addiction for Chinese imports with our worthless dollar. You know our economy is in bad shape when the government is the country's largest employer.

As far as your claim that America prospered because of good wages and access to credit...I don't fully agree, especially the credit part. Ironically a lot of the good wages that your speak of came from manufacturing. We were extremely productive, we were savers, cost of living was low, and the government stayed out of the way. Now the Fed is creating near double-digit inflation, prices have skyrocketed, the average American household has $16,000 in credit card debt, and now 6+ million manufacturing jobs are now performed by the Chinese. At the end of the day the less productive we are, the more it hurts the economy, especially consumers.
The reason iPhones are popular is because people buy them on credit, because all those manufacturing jobs are gone. Eventually the market will catch up to the trade deficit and iPhone sales will drop, at least in the US. I guess then Apple can sell them to the Chinese. And we'll get nothing!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-30-2014, 07:28 PM
 
Location: Forests of Maine
37,311 posts, read 61,111,691 times
Reputation: 30233
Quote:
Originally Posted by winkosmosis View Post
LOL no. Not unless you're a private contractor, and even only if your home is your office.

Even if they were tax deductible, what is your point?
When my employer required that I provide those things, I used them as tax write-offs.

I was not a private contractor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2014, 08:57 AM
 
Location: Living on the Coast in Oxnard CA
16,289 posts, read 32,251,489 times
Reputation: 21890
Quote:
Originally Posted by Submariner View Post
And folks who get $600/month from SS will simply live in cardboard boxes?
Is that what they are getting now? If it is then they are living in cardboard boxes now.

My point to the $80 an hour remark is that it is insane to have a minumum wage. We need to get rid of the minumum wage and allow people to get paid what they are worth. Note to everyone: Not everyone is worth the current minumum wage. You are only worth in pay 1/3 of what you bring back to your employer and that is on a minumum scale. You should be bringing back more of a return than what you are getting paid.

If you want $80 an hour you better figure out how to make $240 an hour for your employer. For those that can make $400 an hour for their employer they should easily make $80 an hour.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2014, 10:02 AM
 
Location: Forests of Maine
37,311 posts, read 61,111,691 times
Reputation: 30233
Quote:
Originally Posted by SOON2BNSURPRISE View Post
Is that what they are getting now? If it is then they are living in cardboard boxes now.
In your region of the country that is possible.

In other regions you can do fine on that level of income.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2014, 12:59 PM
 
Location: Living on the Coast in Oxnard CA
16,289 posts, read 32,251,489 times
Reputation: 21890
Quote:
Originally Posted by Submariner View Post
In your region of the country that is possible.

In other regions you can do fine on that level of income.
I don't know anyone that can live on $600 a month here. My parents are retired and living in Surprise Arizona and they could never live on $600 a month and they don't have a house payment and it is a lot cheaper out there than it is where I live. I doubt with $600 a month that they would ever be able to take trips to the coast, or back to Chicago to visit my moms family. $600 a month would never be living but getting by maybe, if you are lucky. Between water, trash, electric, gas, cable, Internet, Phone, and Cell Phone bill that can eat most of $600 right there. Sure you may not need cable or a phone but try living without water, electric, heat, AC in many areas.

Lets say that you don't own a home, meaning paid off home. To rent a room here in my area would be $700 a month easy. Then again my area is one of the most exspensive in the nation. On average a base 1 bedroom apartment will cost you almost $1,400 a month. A nice place can set you back $2,000 a month. Which is funny because my home that was built in 1962 could rent for $2,500 easy. (Why pay $2,000 for a 1 bedroom when you can get a 4 bedroom home for $2,500 and rent out the other 3 rooms.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top