Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-20-2014, 08:12 AM
 
Location: Central Texas
13,714 posts, read 31,162,494 times
Reputation: 9270

Advertisements

Instead of trying different ways to count money I think people should simply be clear who they are talking about. The wealthiest 1% is not the same as the top 1% of income earners (all sources).

I know people who occasionally have hit the 1% income mark. Sales people who have a great year, or people that exercise stock options can do this. But they aren't rich.

I know a man who is unquestionably very wealthy. His wealth is somewhere between $500M and $1B. He is a humble and generous man but there is no question he lives very differently. Homes in multiple countries, owns two Gulfstream jets, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-07-2015, 12:24 PM
 
996 posts, read 1,235,199 times
Reputation: 1512
1% was just a buzz word for "rich people" that the Occupy Wall Street group and the news media was ranting about.
1% sounds a lot better than 0.1% or 0.01% ... and these are the people that are truly wealthy, weather by net worth or income or both.

To be in the top 0.1% of income (A.G.I.) earners, one had to have income above ... between $1,7000,000 and $2,250,000 between 2001 and 2011. You can see that this varies quite a bit based on year and the economy. These people can consist of two parent professionals, small business owners or retired people with significant assets. But not all of them are truly wealthy in the net worth sense.
(FYI - The high was in 2007, the low was in 2001).

In 2007 you needed $9.5+ million dollars of AGI per year to be in the 0.01% catagory. You can be an actor or a professional athlete and hit those numbers, but that doesn't equate to having a high net worth either.

What's considered wealthy and or rich, or mega rich, with regards to net worth, is a whole seperate debate. Once you get over about $100 million you can usually live a pretty nice lifestyle. But of course many of those people are workaholics ... they may enjoy their money, but it's not like they're sitting on a beach 24 /7 - 365.

Who Is Rich? | Wall Street Oasis
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top