Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-08-2014, 09:58 AM
 
Location: Henderson
1,110 posts, read 1,909,005 times
Reputation: 1039

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScoopLV View Post
The very wealthy already get massive tax breaks. Most of their income comes in the form of capital gains -- the tax on which is kept artificially low. Tesla's massive tax breaks are really no different from that of the Walton family. But at least Tesla will create jobs people actually want to have.

There are "sweetheart deals" at all levels of government. Of COURSE the game is rigged. This is Nevada, after all -- the state that makes no excuses for the house edge.
Not unique to Nevada. The company I used to work for is building a massive plant in Georgia and took over another facility in Minnesota. Both states granted generous tax relief.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-08-2014, 10:22 AM
 
78,409 posts, read 60,593,823 times
Reputation: 49691
Quote:
Originally Posted by pvande55 View Post
While tax giveaways are rarely a good investment, this at least doesn't cost the State anything if the plant closes after a year. And the construction would stimulate the economy. The provision allowing Teslas to be sold there is also critical. Texas also bid for the plant, but does not allow that.
I personally feel that some of the efforts to keep Tesla from being sold in states are:

1) A great example of how some "protective legislation" is really just businesses using their clout to stifle competition....it's not always about "protecting the public"

2) Some of those actions could eventually trigger some pretty ugly lawsuits with regards to anti-trust type actions and essentially bribery aka campaign contributions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2014, 10:47 AM
 
Location: WA
5,641 posts, read 24,955,595 times
Reputation: 6574
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lowexpectations View Post
Can you explain the math behind your post? If I give you nothing and you build a huge factory, employ thousands, increase tax revenues, reduce unemployment or underemployment where the math ends up being unfavorable? Currently Nevada isn't getting anything from Tesla and it will in the future
My initial post did not address the Tesla issue specifically but the press in Nevada is looking at the specifics...

'So who will pay to make up for the tax revenue needed to provide Northern Nevada’s resultant population growth with schools and other government services? That’s the first question Southern Nevada lawmakers should answer when they meet this week, because Clark County’s days of subsidizing the rest of the state should be — must be — at an end.

Regionalism should come into play this week, if only to make sure Southern Nevada isn’t stuck with the bill for highway construction and school enrollment growth in both parts of the state. Part of the Tesla deal requires the state to acquire the right of way needed to link Interstate 80 to U.S. Highway 50, which would alleviate some of the traffic problems that will result from the factory’s opening. Where is that $43 million coming from, considering the backlog of Clark County highway projects and the comparatively light traffic of the Reno area?'
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2014, 11:19 AM
 
Location: Syracuse, New York
3,121 posts, read 3,095,938 times
Reputation: 2312
If none of these states offered deals, companies like Tesla would still have to build their factories.

Some of these state executives need to learn a little Game Theory.

Then again, politicians love to attract the kind of employees who will vote for them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2014, 11:26 AM
 
Location: NY/LA
4,663 posts, read 4,548,803 times
Reputation: 4140
Quote:
Originally Posted by SyraBrian View Post
If none of these states offered deals, companies like Tesla would still have to build their factories.

Some of these state executives need to learn a little Game Theory.

Then again, politicians love to attract the kind of employees who will vote for them.
Companies would still have other options, like moving operations to Mexico.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2014, 12:16 PM
 
Location: Florida
4,103 posts, read 5,425,977 times
Reputation: 10111
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Zero View Post
Companies would still have other options, like moving operations to Mexico.
What he said ^
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2014, 01:03 PM
 
Location: Cold Springs, NV
4,625 posts, read 12,293,890 times
Reputation: 5233
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdelena View Post
My initial post did not address the Tesla issue specifically but the press in Nevada is looking at the specifics...

'So who will pay to make up for the tax revenue needed to provide Northern Nevada’s resultant population growth with schools and other government services? That’s the first question Southern Nevada lawmakers should answer when they meet this week, because Clark County’s days of subsidizing the rest of the state should be — must be — at an end.

Regionalism should come into play this week, if only to make sure Southern Nevada isn’t stuck with the bill for highway construction and school enrollment growth in both parts of the state. Part of the Tesla deal requires the state to acquire the right of way needed to link Interstate 80 to U.S. Highway 50, which would alleviate some of the traffic problems that will result from the factory’s opening. Where is that $43 million coming from, considering the backlog of Clark County highway projects and the comparatively light traffic of the Reno area?'
Please explain how Clark county supports metro Reno? We have 1/4 the population, but have higher per capita income, and lower per capita poverty. Nevada is just like California where the North's tax dollars are at the whim of southern legislative control.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2014, 02:03 PM
 
Location: Vallejo
21,876 posts, read 25,139,139 times
Reputation: 19074
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lowexpectations View Post
You also have to take into account how much of the 1.25 billion is tax breaks that end up not costing the state anything at all.
Individually, yes.

The slippery slope is that Tesla would put the factory somewhere so it costs tax revenue ultimately not to be collected that would be collected somewhere (but maybe not in Nevada). For Nevada individually, however, it's more like offering up $1.25 billion in tax credits that it wouldn't collect anyway since Arizona would have made a similar offer or if not Arizona then New Mexico or if not New Mexico then...

It's sort of a prisoner's dilemma game.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2014, 02:29 PM
 
Location: Orange County, CA
807 posts, read 898,080 times
Reputation: 1391
Tax breaks for corporations will sometimes work but the people who say that they can fail are not wrong either.

An example of tax credits not paying off are film industry incentives. Though some reports may contradict each other and overall jobs can be gained, the issue is when more tax credits are given out than new taxes (from both employment and surrounding economic gains) are taken in. Specific figures are cited in this news article:
Are film tax credits cost effective? - LA Times

In Tesla's case, I am not saying that Nevada will lose money on the deal. It's a lot of cash but given Tesla's future prospects I actually think they have a great chance of doing well. However I just wanted to point out that tax incentives for businesses don't always pay off for the tax payer so Nevada's payout here isn't guaranteed.

By the way, there was also some talk of Tesla eventually opening up a second battery factory. That one may go to another state. Nevada got their factory first because it is where Tesla could get the factory open the fastest, thanks to efforts to streamline the bureaucratic parts of the process.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2014, 04:22 PM
 
9,891 posts, read 11,764,474 times
Reputation: 22087
A state that gives 1.3% of what they feel the gain to Nevada will be, in the form of tax incentives, is making a good investment in the future of the state.

In other words, allow a 1.3 billion dollar savings to Tesla, for a 100 billion dollar return to the state over 20 years.

Nevada Offers Tesla Up To $1.3 Billion To Bring Plant To State
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:41 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top