Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-17-2014, 03:31 PM
 
18,547 posts, read 15,581,120 times
Reputation: 16235

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Petunia 100 View Post
I made a similar mistake when I bought my present home. I bought in late 2007, and prices had already fallen about 45% from the peak 16 months earlier. Darn near half is a pretty substantial drop, and I reasoned that we had to be near bottom. I was so wrong. Prices fell about that much again after I bought.

You know, it's one thing to owe 700k on a home worth 850k. It's quite another to owe 700k on a home worth 250k. Yet, that is the position many people around here found themselves in. Some looked at the facts and decided their best path forward was to strategically default. Note that a strategic default does not recover the money you have already put into your home. Far from being the path to riches, it was for some the most sensible course of action.
Are you still underwater?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-17-2014, 03:56 PM
 
Location: Vallejo
21,868 posts, read 25,129,659 times
Reputation: 19071
Quote:
Originally Posted by Petunia 100 View Post
You know, it's one thing to owe 700k on a home worth 850k. It's quite another to owe 700k on a home worth 250k. Yet, that is the position many people around here put themselves in. Some looked at the facts and decided their best path forward was to strategically default. Note that a strategic default does not recover the money you have already put into your home. Far from being the path to riches, it was for some the most sensible course of action.
I fixed that for you.

Whether or not a strategic default makes more sense probably depends whether you're in a recourse state or can get the lender to agree to not pursue the deficiency in a short sale deal. Defaulting on a $700k loan that sells for $200k after selling expenses and still owing $500k doesn't help you much.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2014, 04:02 PM
 
Location: Native of Any Beach/FL
35,691 posts, read 21,045,148 times
Reputation: 14240
Quote:
Originally Posted by k374 View Post
Americans Face Post-Foreclosure Hell As Wages Garnished And Assets Seized - Business Insider

When will people learn that they must pay what they owe. If you signed a contract with an agreement to pay then you owe that amount. I am against this whole shrugging your shoulders and walking off from your debts. Make the people pay...whenever and whatever they can.



Bank of America moves past worst legal costs, posts loss | Reuters

Since 2010, the second-largest U.S. bank has agreed to pay at least $70 billion to resolve disputes linked to home loans, mortgage bonds and other problems stemming from before and during the crisis. In the most recent settlement, the bank paid $16.65 billion to resolve Department of Justice charges that it misled investors in its mortgage bonds.

yep - yep -the decline in our economy are these poor folks doings! hm hm -- some who lost money in the investment world-want punish them all- no phones -no tv -no happiness, no anything-- after all it is all your over reaching that made this mess.
why are the banks paying out if it was the poor-man's fault? pay the piper Mr Banker.. you played that tune. (Make the people pay)-- no put some bankers in JAIL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2014, 04:08 PM
 
Location: Native of Any Beach/FL
35,691 posts, read 21,045,148 times
Reputation: 14240
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohhboy View Post
The banks were forced by govt to lend to people who they knew couldnt pay . Every tom, dick, and mohammed had a right to own a home........................lol.

HAHAHAHA-- too funny- I worked for the banks they begged to stop the regulations and it was a deal by both parties- and I quit doing 2nd mtg loans because of the fraud. Since when has anyonee ever forced a bank to do anything HAHAHAHA
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2014, 04:51 PM
 
168 posts, read 198,889 times
Reputation: 287
Hopefully in the future we can just construct new jails in which to put these dead beats. These freeloaders can then pay off their debts by the penny by creating license plates, tennis balls, and bricks for hard working Americans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2014, 04:59 PM
 
Location: California side of the Sierras
11,162 posts, read 7,635,022 times
Reputation: 12523
Quote:
Originally Posted by ncole1 View Post
Are you still underwater?
I don't owe more than it's worth anymore; it's still worth quite a bit less than I paid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2014, 05:09 PM
 
Location: California side of the Sierras
11,162 posts, read 7,635,022 times
Reputation: 12523
Quote:
Originally Posted by Malloric View Post
I fixed that for you.
I find it perplexing when people suggest buyers should have known prices were "too high". If lenders did not know, home builders did not know, realtors did not know, and appraisers did not know, how exactly is it that buyers should have known? Do you honestly believe buyers knew that the home they were buying today for 850k would be worth 250k in a few short years? Of course they did not know.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malloric View Post
Whether or not a strategic default makes more sense probably depends whether you're in a recourse state or can get the lender to agree to not pursue the deficiency in a short sale deal. Defaulting on a $700k loan that sells for $200k after selling expenses and still owing $500k doesn't help you much.
Certainly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2014, 06:19 PM
 
34,278 posts, read 19,365,659 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by Petunia 100 View Post
I find it perplexing when people suggest buyers should have known prices were "too high". If lenders did not know, home builders did not know, realtors did not know, and appraisers did not know, how exactly is it that buyers should have known? Do you honestly believe buyers knew that the home they were buying today for 850k would be worth 250k in a few short years? Of course they did not know.



Certainly.
I knew. when I looked at buying a house due to easy access to credit, I looked at the house valuation to income ratios for the last few decades, and decided against it. Instead I bought in 2011 paying 60% for my house compared to what ti sold for in 2008 or so....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2014, 06:30 PM
 
Location: California side of the Sierras
11,162 posts, read 7,635,022 times
Reputation: 12523
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
I knew. when I looked at buying a house due to easy access to credit, I looked at the house valuation to income ratios for the last few decades, and decided against it. Instead I bought in 2011 paying 60% for my house compared to what ti sold for in 2008 or so....
Well, why didn't you alert the rest of us?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2014, 07:09 PM
 
Location: Sputnik Planitia
7,829 posts, read 11,785,978 times
Reputation: 9045
most of the people who bought overvalued properties.. it was their own damn fault. They seriously overpaid for the property because they wanted the house at the time regardless of the consequences. Would you buy a Toyota Corolla tomorrow if it is selling for $100,000? Of course not. During the bubble homes were selling for prices that were absolutely asinine...nobody even stopped to ask questions, if they got the financing they just went for it.

They speculated and gambled and then lost. If you are in a state that has the deficiency judgement then you should've known there is a possibility you could owe thousands upon thousands in deficiencies. So should we feel sorry for these stupid fools? Of course not!

I did not buy a house then and am not buying now in Southern California because I know the prices are in fantasy land. But some people still vehemently justify the prices.. when you tell them it could crash they say never and laugh at you and then when it all collapses they keep crying about how they are the victims.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:46 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top