Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-27-2014, 06:57 PM
 
18,802 posts, read 8,469,715 times
Reputation: 4130

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrRational View Post
Again, that's the theory. The reality though isn't quite so simple.
I and my family members have done it. I advise my patients to do it, and we're in a small town. It should be easier in a large town.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-27-2014, 07:08 PM
 
37,612 posts, read 45,996,704 times
Reputation: 57194
Quote:
Originally Posted by ncole1 View Post
This is a GOOD thing. The whole point of insurance (of any kind, business, car, home, health, disability, life) is to protect you from the financial impact of a catastrophe you aren't expecting and can't afford. Not to subsidize ordinary, mundane expenses such as some perfectly manageable and reasonable doctor bills!

If you want "insurance" to cover everything, you'll end up paying MORE in the long run, since you have to pay higher premiums not only for the health care cost itself, but for the increased overhead resulting from middle-men and bureaucracy costs...

Low deductibles are a colossal waste of money in the long run, especially once you factor in just how much staff and how many hours in a medical clinic are spent on billing insurance for reimbursement. If the patient just freaking paid for it, you'd avoid all the nonsense!
Bull. We are switching to new plans next year, with MUCH higher deductibles, and I just spent several hours analyzing my costs/premiums for the last 2 years of claims. My costs will increase far beyond any decreases in premiums.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2014, 04:50 AM
 
Location: The Triad
34,090 posts, read 82,964,986 times
Reputation: 43666
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoonose View Post
I and my family members have done it.
I advise my patients to do it...
And I **have** done it (or at least valiantly attempted to).
I'm telling you that it doesn't work (absent providers interested in being transparent).

The last point -transparency- is the root problem.
Too few providers, especially beyond the GP level, have any consciousness of it.

I was literally given blank stare of confusion that I wanted to know costs beforehand.
"Huh? Why do you need to know that? No one else has ever asked"

Quote:
...we're in a small town. It should be easier in a large town.
Nope.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2014, 07:24 AM
 
18,547 posts, read 15,584,312 times
Reputation: 16235
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaggy001 View Post
That depends entirely on your age and your health. And even then, you are not immune from accidents. For example, suppose you tear your ACL playing tennis or skiing. By the time you have paid for doctors, scans, knee braces, possibly surgery, etc. etc., with a high deductible plan you are thousands of dollars out of pocket.
Sure, but $5000 out of pocket will be recouped by lower premiums. The difference in premiums for a 30-year-old between high deductible and very low (< $1000) deductible is almost $200/month. At that rate you could have an accident every 3 years and still come out ahead with the high deductible!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2014, 07:31 AM
 
18,547 posts, read 15,584,312 times
Reputation: 16235
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChessieMom View Post
Bull. We are switching to new plans next year, with MUCH higher deductibles, and I just spent several hours analyzing my costs/premiums for the last 2 years of claims. My costs will increase far beyond any decreases in premiums.
If you have a lot of health issues then yes, it may. But for the majority a low deductible seems to be just a forced financial commitment device designed for people who don't have the discipline to save the difference in premiums for an emergency.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2014, 08:19 AM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
3,158 posts, read 6,123,489 times
Reputation: 5619
Quote:
Originally Posted by RecentGrad1 View Post
And, on average, you saved more than that amount out of your premiums.

Insurance is supposed to cover you in face of something you could not otherwise afford. The only real reason to buy a plan other than a high-deductible plan is either:
  1. Your risk profile is higher than would be expected for your age group
  2. You're living paycheck to paycheck.
A plan with a $25K+ deductible would work great for me, for example. I have much more than that saved, and I'm very healthy male at age of 24.
Here is something to think about:

Let's suppose that you suffer a torn rotator cuff after a bad fall. According to the NIH the best case scenario is going to cost about $26,000 for surgery, which you can afford since you have $25,000+ saved up. What happens when you break your arm the next year (about $4000) or you need a new car, or you put money down on a house before any of your accidents.

I'm glad that you have managed to save such a hefty sum, but the average American household has only $5000 saved, and most have less than that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2014, 08:49 AM
 
14,247 posts, read 17,922,570 times
Reputation: 13807
Quote:
Originally Posted by ncole1 View Post
Sure, but $5000 out of pocket will be recouped by lower premiums. The difference in premiums for a 30-year-old between high deductible and very low (< $1000) deductible is almost $200/month. At that rate you could have an accident every 3 years and still come out ahead with the high deductible!
The problem not many of us are 30 years old and those that are only manage it for one year. You are trying to take one scenario and extrapolate it across the population. And it simply doesn't work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2014, 08:54 AM
 
Location: Houston, TX
2,052 posts, read 5,872,503 times
Reputation: 1298
I envy those with good plans this year. We are going from a decent plan, $1k ded, $1,900 OOP for 1 person, $3,800 for a family, to a new plan with a deductable of $1K and max family OOP of $5,800. There is no more single patient max OOP, so the insurance does not pay 100% until the family max is met. So this means we will have to pay OOP $3,900 MORE next year than this year, and at the same time pay even MORE for premiums. This will hit me hard, as my wife has cancer and her Dr. bills are in the tens of thousands per year. And I work for an insurance company! I will have to get a second job to pay for her medical bills next year, most likely.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2014, 09:00 AM
 
18,802 posts, read 8,469,715 times
Reputation: 4130
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrRational View Post
And I **have** done it (or at least valiantly attempted to).
I'm telling you that it doesn't work (absent providers interested in being transparent).

The last point -transparency- is the root problem.
Too few providers, especially beyond the GP level, have any consciousness of it.

I was literally given blank stare of confusion that I wanted to know costs beforehand.
"Huh? Why do you need to know that? No one else has ever asked"


Nope.


I've practiced medicine for almost 40 years. As a primary care provider and a provider of medical ancillary services in the past, I have approved such breaks for patients, as well as coaching them for other facility discounts. And as a patient I have received such breaks from other facilities. As have the rest of my family.

I'm sorry that your personal experience hasn't panned out for your benefit. You might not be asking the right person. Many times it takes some digging and/or repeat calls.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2014, 09:07 AM
 
Location: The Triad
34,090 posts, read 82,964,986 times
Reputation: 43666
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoonose View Post
I'm sorry that your personal experience hasn't panned out for your benefit.
You might not be asking the right person.
Many times it takes some digging and/or repeat calls.
Which is why I described the lack of transparency as the primary problem.
Which is why I described the exercise of getting data as "like pulling teeth".

The providers don't want to reveal their pricing or be clear about policies.
As it stands they have no authority imposing that expectation on them.
They'll continue to dig in their heels when pressed.

Maybe one day we'll have a medical industrial complex that works for patients.
I won't be holding my breath waiting for it though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:26 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top