Discouraging having kids to get welfare?

[Sommie789]

Originally Posted by ColdNHot75

Trust me. If we stopped paying the expenses for poor people having kids the number of poor out of wedlock births would drop. Our system is set up to reward people who should not be having children and it strains our country's financial resources. Is it fair that we have to pick up the hospital bills for so many poor children and than provide them food and shelter all because mommy wanted a baby she could not afford. I say hell NO. This system we have in place is not working but no one wants to do anything about it because doing so makes you a racist.

Most of those people are going still have those kids with or without welfare because that what poorer people do.
Welfare has no color.
There is very simple solution to this we need promote birth control better and need more jobs.

[john620]

Originally Posted by ncole1

I propose that all benefits related to children be cut by 40% on any children born to parents drawing food stamps, housing vouchers, or Medicaid within the 2 years prior to the child's birth (excluding a period of 9 months prior to the child's birth).

For example, if a couple has 2 kids and gets on food stamps, and then a year later has a third, they will get the full benefits for their first two children only, plus 60% of the difference between three-child benefits and two-child benefits.

If the third child is born 3 months after they first get the benefits, then the family gets the full benefits of 3 kids because it falls within the 9 month exclusion period.

Thoughts?

Just cut out all that crap in the first place. The only reason so many thugs are born is because of welfare and ebt.

[tijlover]

The babies have to come from somewhere, with the lowering of the fertility rate worldwide! No more welfare babies, then the immigrants take their place! Pick your poison!