Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-03-2015, 08:25 PM
 
Location: South Texas
4,248 posts, read 4,162,135 times
Reputation: 6051

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by freemkt View Post
I think it's in the neighborhood of 5% with significant variance among sectors, e.g. oil and supermarkets run on thin margins. Big Oil makes up for it in volume.
So does Little Oil, to the extent that they can. Gas stations make only a few cents per gallon on fuel sales. Inside sales, particularly the soda fountain, are their money-makers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-03-2015, 09:24 PM
 
Location: Centennial, CO
2,276 posts, read 3,077,907 times
Reputation: 3781
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garfunkle524 View Post
Impossible question. Industry norms vary drastically. An "average" would be completely meaningless and extremely misleading.
This. It's going to vary a lot by industry. I can tell you that for a large homebuilder the typical net margin is going to be 10-20%. My company's overall net margin last year was about 15%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2015, 11:56 PM
 
5,342 posts, read 6,167,028 times
Reputation: 4719
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick538 View Post
Apple, which uses Chinese sweatshop labor and is loved by liberals, has a net profit margin of around 42%.

Wal-Mart, which uses Chinese sweatshop labor and is hated by liberals, has a net profit margin of less than 4%.

Food for thought?
I've always found this rather hilarious!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2015, 01:20 AM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,455,098 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slowpoke_TX View Post
So does Little Oil, to the extent that they can. Gas stations make only a few cents per gallon on fuel sales. Inside sales, particularly the soda fountain, are their money-makers.

Little Oil is manipulated by Big Oil, the neighborhood gas station has its prices pretty much dictated by a micro managing supplier that charges what the neighborhood will bear.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2015, 05:46 AM
 
Location: South Texas
4,248 posts, read 4,162,135 times
Reputation: 6051
Quote:
Originally Posted by freemkt View Post
Little Oil is manipulated by Big Oil, the neighborhood gas station has its prices pretty much dictated by a micro managing supplier that charges what the neighborhood will bear.
The neighborhood gas station owner does not buy fuel directly from Big Oil, but from a middleman called a jobber.


Step 1: A store owner calls a jobber and places an order for fuel. They negotiate a per-gallon rate that the store owner will pay the jobber.

Step 2: Once that agreement has been reached, the jobber then dispatches a tanker truck to the loading rack to lift the fuel. The loading rack bills the jobber for the fuel at whatever per-gallon rate is in effect at the time the the tanker truck driver prints the Bill of Lading for his load. This price can change several times throughout the day.

Step 3: After the delivery, the jobber receives invoices from the loading rack and the trucking company, and issues an invoice to the store owners.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2015, 08:42 AM
 
382 posts, read 628,926 times
Reputation: 232
Wow, some pretty good and realistic responses here.

The results of a survey back in 2013 (by Reason-Rupe) that asked the public "What percentage of each sale dollar is profit, after taxes?" inspired the question posed here in city-data.

I left the notion of profit vague because, as some pointed out, there are different ways to define it, and because the survey was measuring perception at a "ball park" level (the general public probably don't have a sophisticated view of what different ways of defining "profit" are) - not precision.

As promised, here goes....

It seems that the public perception is 36%!

Reality is they over estimated by about five times the actual margin!!

That is from this article (highly recommend reading it):
The public thinks the average company makes a 36% profit margin, which is about 5X too high - AEI | Carpe Diem Blog » AEIdeas

Source the author used for actuals and industry comparison is Yahoo Finance database:
https://biz.yahoo.com/p/sum_qpmd.html

As some pointed out here, there IS a range and the average differs by industry. None met that level, though Telecom and REITs came close, at over 30%.

I have not explored the database, but I strongly suspect that those industry numbers vary significantly over time, especially over long time periods (e.g. property values have been on a steady march upwards lately - some say several markets are in or are approaching bubble territory).

Why is this important?

As the article says: "The public that believes in the fantasy-world of sky-high 36% profit margins would naturally think companies are just being greedy and stingy when don’t pay higher “living wages†and have to be forced to do so through minimum wage, or living wage, legislation"

The strange thing is, if the public thinks profits are that high, why are they not investing more in stocks? Could it be cognitive dissonance?

What other implications do you see?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2015, 11:25 AM
 
Location: Myrtle Creek, Oregon
15,293 posts, read 17,681,555 times
Reputation: 25236
The typical restaurant with a good customer base prices food at 1/3 for ingredients, 1/3 for overhead, and 1/3 for profit. Fast food is closer to 50% profit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2015, 11:25 AM
 
Location: Ruidoso, NM
5,667 posts, read 6,594,347 times
Reputation: 4817
Quote:
Originally Posted by Transplanted99 View Post
It seems that the public perception is 36%!
Actually they are spot on, when you look at it this way.


Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2015, 12:52 PM
 
12,846 posts, read 9,050,725 times
Reputation: 34919
Interesting to think about if profit is after all costs. So, if I were a business and paid all my costs, which in this case would equate to home, food, utilities, etc, as well as a salary to me for managing my business and then I got a 5% extra on top, that actually wouldn't be too bad. In a billion dollar business, that 5% would be 50 mil.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2015, 02:08 PM
 
382 posts, read 628,926 times
Reputation: 232
Quote:
Originally Posted by rruff View Post
Actually they are spot on, when you look at it this way.

Interesting chart.

Some of the challenge with it is that it is not clear what it is depicting - only says "NIPA Table 1.14", which is rather misleading.

Looking up NIPA Table 1.14 and you will find several lines that are related to differing definitions of Corporate Profit.
http://www.econstats.com/nipa/NIPA1_1_14_.htm

Then, there is the problem of what is the measure of "Output"?

Is it National Proft vs National Output, Domestic Profit vs Domestic Output, or National Profit vs Domestic Output? To get apples to apples BOTH Foreign Sales and Profit from abroad should be counted (or not counted), but not one without the other. We cannot tell from the chart provided.

There are other issues to contend with (e.g. double counting) that are addressed in the following article, which discusses measuring profit margins from an investors' point of view, using aggregated data from BEA (i.e. NIPA tables):
Profit Margins: The Death of a Chart | PHILOSOPHICAL ECONOMICS

Bottom Line is ... "Utilizing the data in NIPA Table 1.14 (FRED), we end up with the following chart, which is the only accurate NIPA chart of net profit margins for the macroeconomy, and the only NIPA chart that anyone should be citing in this debate" - per the article linked:

http://i1.wp.com/www.philosophicalec...03/avgke11.jpg

BTW, it is particularly interesting in the article I linked, that NOwhere is there anything close to the numbers depicted to those in the chart you provided, and they provide several variations of charts, starting with two versions at the very top which they claim are common in the dispute of measuring aggregate profit margins in the economy.

Last edited by Transplanted99; 04-04-2015 at 02:54 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:24 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top