Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 01-19-2016, 06:50 PM
 
34,053 posts, read 17,064,521 times
Reputation: 17212

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pittsflyer View Post
If the technology is cheap enough that the employee or a group of employees could also buy one and compete against their own boss then its totally worth using your free time to take the free training. BUT if its a multi million dollar piece of equipment that only one company is using the "free training" value is dubious at best.

Nonsense, the employee trained has gained a new skill, which may help him find other jobs up the road.

 
Old 01-19-2016, 06:51 PM
 
34,053 posts, read 17,064,521 times
Reputation: 17212
Quote:
Originally Posted by pittsflyer View Post
Not if it is exploitive, ie the employee has few other options. If the market is captive that is anti competitive and is the definition of crony capitalism.

No such thing as exploitive. Those with few options failed to develop enough marketable skills..their choice, their problem to deal with.
 
Old 01-19-2016, 06:59 PM
 
7,654 posts, read 5,114,492 times
Reputation: 5036
I think that's an over simplification and results in people pursuing things that are not in the best interests of society.


Quote:
Originally Posted by BobNJ1960 View Post
No such thing as exploitive. Those with few options failed to develop enough marketable skills..their choice, their problem to deal with.
 
Old 01-19-2016, 09:21 PM
 
Location: Spain
12,722 posts, read 7,574,122 times
Reputation: 22634
Quote:
Originally Posted by pittsflyer View Post
Depends on how niche the training is and how valuable it makes you in the over all market. Most of that stuff is really specialized to that specific employer so unless they are paying for the time and the training it is not always particularly valuable to the employees resume outside of that company so why would the employee invest their own time into it ... for fear of being fired, that's about it.
WHat do you mean "most of that stuff is specialized to a specific employer" can you quantify that? Like what percentage of skills that people learn for a job is only applicable at their employer?

That sounds like some serious facts on the fly.
 
Old 01-19-2016, 09:24 PM
 
Location: Spain
12,722 posts, read 7,574,122 times
Reputation: 22634
Moderator cut: .

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimhcom View Post
The usual scenario is to drop off a new piece of equipment and then tell the operator they are on their own.
Prove it. We're going to need a little more than jimhcom chasing his conclusion by claiming to know the training methods of thousands of companies.

Last edited by yellowbelle; 01-19-2016 at 10:36 PM.. Reason: quoted post has been deleted
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:43 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top