Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-10-2016, 09:34 AM
 
18,803 posts, read 8,462,725 times
Reputation: 4130

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ncole1 View Post
It does not make us money, it costs us money (interest payments). The lender earns money, the borrower spends it.
For those of us who invest it has been a good thing.

For those strapped with borrowing costs maybe not.

But interest rates are low, and business here and in the world is expanding. Much related to the USD.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-10-2016, 03:48 PM
 
18,547 posts, read 15,572,959 times
Reputation: 16225
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoonose View Post
For those of us who invest it has been a good thing.

For those strapped with borrowing costs maybe not.

But interest rates are low, and business here and in the world is expanding. Much related to the USD.
How has the US debt been good for those who hold less in US bonds than the per capita national debt?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2016, 04:36 PM
 
18,803 posts, read 8,462,725 times
Reputation: 4130
Quote:
Originally Posted by ncole1 View Post
How has the US debt been good for those who hold less in US bonds than the per capita national debt?
Confusing and confounding question.

The poor shouldn't care one bit.

Individuals who own 5 or 6 figures of Treasuries are making small gains along with the safety and security of those holdings. If they pay a lot of tax they could be net negative there. But I suspect that more typically they have many other investments/holdings and gains.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2016, 08:06 PM
 
3,792 posts, read 2,383,791 times
Reputation: 768
Quote:
Originally Posted by ncole1 View Post
How has the US debt been good for those who hold less in US bonds than the per capita national debt?
The accruing of it has pushed up the AD line.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2016, 08:45 PM
 
18,547 posts, read 15,572,959 times
Reputation: 16225
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoonose View Post
Confusing and confounding question.

The poor shouldn't care one bit.

Individuals who own 5 or 6 figures of Treasuries are making small gains along with the safety and security of those holdings. If they pay a lot of tax they could be net negative there. But I suspect that more typically they have many other investments/holdings and gains.
...which are not dependent on the US being massively in debt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2016, 08:46 PM
 
18,547 posts, read 15,572,959 times
Reputation: 16225
Quote:
Originally Posted by ContrarianEcon View Post
The accruing of it has pushed up the AD line.
Evidence for this claim?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2016, 08:59 PM
 
18,803 posts, read 8,462,725 times
Reputation: 4130
Quote:
Originally Posted by ncole1 View Post
...which are not dependent on the US being massively in debt.
We the people, businesses, communities and governments own most of that debt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2016, 11:54 AM
 
3,792 posts, read 2,383,791 times
Reputation: 768
Quote:
Originally Posted by ncole1 View Post
Evidence for this claim?
Classic Keynesian economics. The government needs to step in and take over spending when everyone else can't.


So racking up a huge national debt is just the government doing its Keynesian thing, pushing the AD line up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2016, 12:02 PM
 
4,231 posts, read 3,555,945 times
Reputation: 2207
Quote:
Originally Posted by ContrarianEcon View Post
Classic Keynesian economics. The government needs to step in and take over spending when everyone else can't.


So racking up a huge national debt is just the government doing its Keynesian thing, pushing the AD line up.
Exactly.

And remember they are always heroes.

Private industry is the champion until they need uncle Sam to step in.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2016, 12:27 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,152,432 times
Reputation: 21738
Quote:
Originally Posted by ContrarianEcon View Post
Classic Keynesian economics.
Which does not apply to Consumer or Debt-based Economies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:05 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top