Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-27-2017, 09:20 AM
 
Location: moved
13,646 posts, read 9,704,293 times
Reputation: 23472

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by craigiri View Post
... Also, DOW 20K - so DOW was 11K in 1999. 17+ years for less than a double? What are people celebrating?

Let me do the math.

OK, so at the lowest rate of inflation I can find, the 11K would be 16.5K today. So the gain over and over inflation over that time period is about 1.2%.

If we disregard inflation the rate of interest (simple) was about 4%

Since most people and funds (pensions, etc.) have figured on a higher rate over a long time, there isn't much to celebrate unless we see DOW 30K within 18 months or so.
Agreed. I'm grateful for Dow-20K, given where it's recently been; but relative to the torrid pace of the 1980s and 1990s, and the market's position in the spring of 2000, thus far the 21st century has been pallid and desultory. Even more disturbing is that present valuations are not cheap; compare the present, to the previous long-term market nadir, of 1982.

In sum, the great disappointment of 21st century economics can be regarded as neither the grievous plight of workers, nor the exorbitant cost of health care, but - wait for it! - the decline growth-rate of corporate profits.

Why is this so? My belief, without too much exaggeration or hankering for a sweeping generalization, is that there's one root cause to all of our economic problems: stunted pace of innovation. We aren't innovating today, as well as we did 50 years ago, or 100 years ago. The consequence is attenuated growth, which can show up as lower purchasing-power for workers, or lower capital gains for investors, or lower tax-revenue for governments.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-27-2017, 03:37 PM
 
8,943 posts, read 11,777,950 times
Reputation: 10870
It's time to watch your 401K like a hawk. Better yet, unload some stock funds and move the money to safer havens like bonds. I have.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2017, 04:31 PM
 
106,611 posts, read 108,757,383 times
Reputation: 80101
bonds safe ? i would sooner declare stocks the safer of the two . have you been watching bonds the last 3 months . long term bonds fell 15%
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2017, 11:02 AM
 
Location: SoCal
20,160 posts, read 12,753,835 times
Reputation: 16993
I'm glad I did free up some for cash Friday. Great timing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2017, 11:08 AM
 
106,611 posts, read 108,757,383 times
Reputation: 80101
less than 1% is hardly great timing .

in fact looking at the golden butterfly i see it is down all of .38% .

unless you were buying a 100% stocks you didn't even get 1% . i show the 60/40 model i track as a point of reference consisting of vti and ftbfx down .54%
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2017, 12:15 PM
 
Location: SoCal
20,160 posts, read 12,753,835 times
Reputation: 16993
Trust me, it was great timing. I want to shift some money to these funds so I bet today I bought in lower. 1% here and there is better than nothing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2017, 12:36 PM
 
106,611 posts, read 108,757,383 times
Reputation: 80101
it usually shakes out you lost more than 1% on that money waiting to save 1% . i bet if you shifted earlier if the money was available you would be ahead .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2017, 12:56 PM
 
Location: SoCal
20,160 posts, read 12,753,835 times
Reputation: 16993
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
it usually shakes out you lost more than 1% on that money waiting to save 1% . i bet if you shifted earlier if the money was available you would be ahead .
Maybe you are right but I sleep better. I was in ETFs so it was not sitting doing nothing. Still stick to my AA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2017, 12:57 PM
 
106,611 posts, read 108,757,383 times
Reputation: 80101
well guess you will be up now . lol

remember we all thought low was when we fell 2000 points in 2008 . little did we know we had 4000 more to go .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2017, 12:59 PM
 
Location: SoCal
20,160 posts, read 12,753,835 times
Reputation: 16993
I don't think I ever buy at the absolutely low nor sell at the absolute high either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top