Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-30-2017, 06:45 AM
 
4,224 posts, read 3,020,173 times
Reputation: 3812

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by freemkt View Post
That's odd, in all my burger flipping jobs I've never worked with an hourly employee who itemized.
Your experience may be typical in your environment, but it isn't indicative of anything that would actually be relevant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-30-2017, 06:57 AM
 
4,345 posts, read 2,795,289 times
Reputation: 5821
The interest deduction was supposed to help people achieve the America Dream of owning a house. Owning a home is more permanent than renting. It helps form stable communities.

When more people paid income tax, when interest rates were higher, when the soldiers and sailors came back from WWII it worked. Today, from the information posters have provided, the case for it looks much weaker.

Why home owners should be subsidized while renter were not was always a counter argument. In the event, it was proven wrong. But in todays world it carries more weight.

I say do away with it now, when the need for it has diminished and the arguments against it are more valid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2017, 07:10 AM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,464,007 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by Troyfan View Post
The interest deduction was supposed to help people achieve the America Dream of owning a house. Owning a home is more permanent than renting. It helps form stable communities.

When more people paid income tax, when interest rates were higher, when the soldiers and sailors came back from WWII it worked. Today, from the information posters have provided, the case for it looks much weaker.

Why home owners should be subsidized while renter were not was always a counter argument. In the event, it was proven wrong. But in todays world it carries more weight.

I say do away with it now, when the need for it has diminished and the arguments against it are more valid.

Renting under rent control is more permanent than renting without rent control. It helps form stable communities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2017, 07:39 AM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,585 posts, read 81,206,701 times
Reputation: 57821
When the new homes start at 1.1 million as they do here, the mortgage interest, even at 3.5% will result in a big tax deduction of about $60,000/year. We owe less than $300k and still deduct about $10,000. Yes, the elimination of that deduction will have a huge impact on new home sales, and also s significant impact on existing home sales, both costing jobs not only in construction, but in the real estate and mortgage industries.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2017, 08:16 AM
 
26,191 posts, read 21,591,383 times
Reputation: 22772
It certainly can have an impact and if it does it should at the more expensive end of the market. As stated about half of homeowners, with a mortgage do not take the mortgage interest deduction. That's likely on the lower end of the housing market. The tax benefit is often way oversold anyhow by people who either don't understand how it works or simply sell real estate
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2017, 08:36 AM
 
4,224 posts, read 3,020,173 times
Reputation: 3812
Simply eliminating the deduction would suddenly put millions of current homeowners behind the eight-ball. Having purchased their homes at prices that assumed a 25% or so tax subsidy, they will not be able to afford a sale to buyers who do not have access to such a subsidy. Instead of being a wealth-building strategy, home ownership would become a wealth-destroying strategy. That would nor be a positive thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2017, 09:24 AM
 
15,802 posts, read 20,513,219 times
Reputation: 20974
Tax incentives weren't a factor in my home purchase. They are a nice "after the fact", but if they went away, it wouldn't really affect our ability to own our home.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2017, 09:27 AM
 
4,224 posts, read 3,020,173 times
Reputation: 3812
Would it affect your ability to sell it? Do you think the appraised value of your home would ultimately change?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2017, 09:54 AM
 
4,345 posts, read 2,795,289 times
Reputation: 5821
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemlock140 View Post
When the new homes start at 1.1 million as they do here, the mortgage interest, even at 3.5% will result in a big tax deduction of about $60,000/year. We owe less than $300k and still deduct about $10,000. Yes, the elimination of that deduction will have a huge impact on new home sales, and also s significant impact on existing home sales, both costing jobs not only in construction, but in the real estate and mortgage industries.
The tax deductibility helped make that situation. Without it people would think twice before moving to over-priced areas and houses in them wouldn't be fetching as much.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2017, 10:53 AM
 
5,907 posts, read 4,432,537 times
Reputation: 13442
Free market, how do people own homes to even take a mortgage deduction?!?!? With the rent prices and evil landlords, how could they have ever broken free from the shackles?


Tax deductions don't drive home purchases. The tail doesn't wag the dog.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:52 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top