Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-22-2018, 07:39 PM
 
6,438 posts, read 6,917,875 times
Reputation: 8743

Advertisements

Class has to do with achievements, aspirations, lifestyle, assets, philanthropy, and intergenerational transfer of wealth. Income is, well, income.

I'm upper-middle to upper income but not upper class.

A Harvard student who lives on almost no money but who comes from a family of doctors, industrialists, etc. is upper class. An auto repair garage owner who sold his business for a couple of million typically is not (although he is to be commended for working hard and getting ahead).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-22-2018, 08:09 PM
 
Location: Honolulu, HI
24,623 posts, read 9,454,674 times
Reputation: 22962
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoonose View Post
What's the difference between wealthy and upper class?

If someone has the means but decides not to live in a large and fancy house for instance, are they upper class or not?

Can someone be rich and still lower class?
Plenty of people are rich and still lower class, professional athletes. They blow their money on alimony, child support, poor investments, friends/family, bills, depreciating assets etc. and when they stop playing, they’re broke. (these are based on statistics)

Now if they took their money and invested into successful ventures and earned passive income and assets then their kids could benefit form wealth inheritance and be considered upper class.

The distinction, IMO, is that upper class can transfer their wealth to futures generations while the rich are not at that level yet.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve McDonald View Post
Acquiring large amounts of money may gain you entry to the ranks of the Nouveau Riche, but it won't give you any class at all.
I agree. If you look at the tech billionaires in Silicon Valley with bright orange Lamborghinis and grey hoodies for work, old money like Kennedy or Rockefeller family dynasties wouldn’t consider them upper class. However, if those guys take care of their money, then their kids or kids kids will eventually be upper class.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2018, 09:33 PM
 
5,381 posts, read 8,687,308 times
Reputation: 4550
You can use the Pew calculator to see where you stand based upon your state, metropolitan area, pre-tax income and household size.

Are you in the U.S. middle class? Try our income calculator | Pew Research Center


Step 2 allows you to make comparisons with others in the US of your age, marital status, race/ethnicity and educational level.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2018, 08:17 AM
 
Location: Wooster, Ohio
4,141 posts, read 3,052,785 times
Reputation: 7280
Quote:
Originally Posted by pacific2 View Post
You can use the Pew calculator to see where you stand based upon your state, metropolitan area, pre-tax income and household size.

Are you in the U.S. middle class? Try our income calculator | Pew Research Center


Step 2 allows you to make comparisons with others in the US of your age, marital status, race/ethnicity and educational level.
According to this and the original calculator, I am upper class. My lifestyle is The Millionaire Next Door, however.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2018, 10:12 AM
 
3,319 posts, read 1,817,554 times
Reputation: 10336
Quote:
Originally Posted by turf3 View Post
True! I miswrote.

"Upper income" means high income. That is really all it means.

"Upper financial status" to me means you don't need to work to maintain an expensive lifestyle. This is what most people would call "rich".

"Upper class" is a social marker which as I and others have stated, is not driven by financial status though it tends to correlate.
Agree... all three terms have different meanings.

But 'upper financial status' is a terribly broad term, which I choose to divide as follows:

"Wealthy" is when you can comfortably live off the income from your investments alone.

"Rich" is when you can live comfortably off the income from the income of your investments alone.

"Super Rich" is when you could live comfortably off the income from the income from the income of your investments alone.

For each of us, these categories would differ, but I don't think by very much.
For me, wealthy is 3+ million dollars.
Rich is 75+ million $$, and Super Rich is over a billion.
After that... ?
What asset level/net worth do you need to join each group?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2018, 10:30 AM
 
Location: Myrtle Creek, Oregon
15,293 posts, read 17,681,555 times
Reputation: 25236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoonose View Post
So I guess Warren Buffett to be middle class. Except for the private jet.
In an interview with one of his daughters, she said her childhood was middle class, but her education was upper class. I have also seen realtor pictures of the home he just sold. It was a very nice house, but not particularly ostentatious. He paid $31,500 for it in 1958.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2018, 10:45 AM
 
18,802 posts, read 8,469,715 times
Reputation: 4130
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Caldwell View Post
In an interview with one of his daughters, she said her childhood was middle class, but her education was upper class. I have also seen realtor pictures of the home he just sold. It was a very nice house, but not particularly ostentatious. He paid $31,500 for it in 1958.
IMO this social upper class is a silly, throw back notion. Sure there is correlation with wealth. But IMO it is the accumulated and accessible wealth that matters most in placing someone in some descriptive economic range. What they do with their money, how they live, how you think they live, or imagine them on 'lifestyles of the rich and famous' are less useful notions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2018, 12:39 PM
 
Location: Formerly Pleasanton Ca, now in Marietta Ga
10,351 posts, read 8,567,170 times
Reputation: 16693
Quote:
Originally Posted by PamelaIamela View Post
Agree... all three terms have different meanings.

But 'upper financial status' is a terribly broad term, which I choose to divide as follows:

"Wealthy" is when you can comfortably live off the income from your investments alone.

"Rich" is when you can live comfortably off the income from the income of your investments alone.

"Super Rich" is when you could live comfortably off the income from the income from the income of your investments alone.

For each of us, these categories would differ, but I don't think by very much.
For me, wealthy is 3+ million dollars.
Rich is 75+ million $$, and Super Rich is over a billion.
After that... ?
What asset level/net worth do you need to join each group?
You kind of lost me on the income.could you give examples?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2018, 01:22 PM
 
6,438 posts, read 6,917,875 times
Reputation: 8743
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Caldwell View Post
In an interview with one of his daughters, she said her childhood was middle class, but her education was upper class. I have also seen realtor pictures of the home he just sold. It was a very nice house, but not particularly ostentatious. He paid $31,500 for it in 1958.
I've actually driven by his house. It is similar to the houses in the upper middle class neighborhood where I live. For a multibillionaire, he really did live quite modestly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2018, 04:09 AM
 
Location: Honolulu, HI
24,623 posts, read 9,454,674 times
Reputation: 22962
I think we all have a consensus:

Upper income:
Doctors
Successful lawyers
Professional athletes
CEO
Major business owners/founders
Successful entrepreneurs

Upper class:
Rockefeller family
Kardashian Family (a long with the Jenner family, it’s a lot of money)
Bush Family
Hilton Family
Kennedy Family
Koch Family
Walton Family
Rothschild Family


The difference, obviously, is the transgenerational wealth. And the fact it’s a family or dynasty and not just one person who has money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:32 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top