Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-14-2018, 10:12 AM
 
Location: Was Midvalley Oregon; Now Eastside Seattle area
13,072 posts, read 7,508,849 times
Reputation: 9798

Advertisements

I think we need to rethink corn. Mathusian thinking has been surpassed with climate change
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-14-2018, 11:36 AM
 
Location: Sector 001
15,945 posts, read 12,285,067 times
Reputation: 16109
Quote:
Originally Posted by redguitar77111 View Post
While I do oppose corn subsidies, the obesity issue could have been delt with through a law banning Hig Fructose Corn Syrup.
Not gonna help. Despite the hype there's little difference between HFCS, sugar, honey, and fruit juice. Its all in the marketing and the perception that natural is better.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2018, 11:53 AM
 
26,191 posts, read 21,583,182 times
Reputation: 22772
Quote:
Originally Posted by stockwiz View Post
Not gonna help. Despite the hype there's little difference between HFCS, sugar, honey, and fruit juice. Its all in the marketing and the perception that natural is better.

The biggest issue is overconsumption really rather than the type
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2018, 06:19 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,358,834 times
Reputation: 7990
Quote:
Originally Posted by stockwiz View Post
Not gonna help. Despite the hype there's little difference between HFCS, sugar, honey, and fruit juice. Its all in the marketing and the perception that natural is better.
There have been studies to the contrary on this.
Rats and High-Fructose Corn Syrup | In the Pipeline


I used to drink a lot of fruit juice with HFCS, and also was a severe candy addict. Every break at work I would be at the vending machines buying candy. I quit buying the HFCS and without even me realizing it, my cravings for candy gradually went away. I can't prove that it was the HFCS, but I'm convinced that it was.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2018, 08:05 PM
 
23,688 posts, read 9,380,724 times
Reputation: 8652
i dont beleive in subsidizing ethanol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2018, 08:09 PM
 
5,907 posts, read 4,430,666 times
Reputation: 13442
That’s quite a kernel of truth. I’m all ears on how to fix this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2018, 01:34 PM
 
8,272 posts, read 10,989,003 times
Reputation: 8910
Quote:
Originally Posted by C24L View Post
i dont beleive in subsidizing ethanol
Some folks as stated just don't get it.

The subsidized corn is used for ethanol gasoline. Not some debate about food stamps or sugary drinks.

Large multinational companies are getting vast amounts of free money from the US taxpayer to manufacturer ethanol gasoline substitute.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2018, 01:46 PM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,379 posts, read 60,561,367 times
Reputation: 60996
While you guys go back and forth about farm subsidies you need to know the why of them starting.
Pro Hint:
The beginnings go back to Herbert Hoover and the beginning of the Great Depression and Franklin Roosevelt and the New Deal.

https://grist.org/article/farm_bill2/

https://fee.org/articles/the-origin-...arm-subsidies/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2018, 03:46 PM
 
8,272 posts, read 10,989,003 times
Reputation: 8910
Quote:
Originally Posted by North Beach Person View Post
While you guys go back and forth about farm subsidies you need to know
Not about subsidies to most farmers. For or against farm subsidies is for a different post.

Only subsidies for production of ethanol gasoline here. These are unique subsidies but as article below states - all mixed up with "farm" subsidies. Part of this has to do with corn.

"As a result, taxpayers have spent billions of dollars over the last 30 years subsidizing the production of corn ethanol, while at the same time creating unintended costs for consumers and the environment."

Link

I'm guessing here. But I don't think most folks even know what ethanol is nor where it comes from nor who is paying the subsidies for the production of ethanol gasoline.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2018, 08:24 PM
 
5,317 posts, read 3,226,802 times
Reputation: 8245
Corn subsidies = crony enrichment.

Anything beyond this is just commentary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:59 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top