U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Covid-19 Information Page
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Old 04-16-2008, 02:44 PM
Location: Georgia, on the Florida line, right above Tallahassee
10,474 posts, read 14,486,365 times
Reputation: 6378


When drug costs soar beyond reach - International Herald Tribune

Employers, including the federal government, also bear responsibility. They have been pressing to reduce their prescription drug expenditures by shifting more of the burden to patients. One patient who had been paying only $20 for a month's supply of a multiple sclerosis drug was shocked when the charge rose to $325 per month. (It has since been suspended.) Another patient found that his co-payment for a newly prescribed leukemia drug would exceed $4,000 for a 90-day supply, so he has deferred buying it.

I wonder if one day there will be jars on the counter of every store in the nation....with a picture of someone and the request "XXX needs money for meds - Please, give!"

Here's a sort of different story...kind of related....so I'll throw a link.

A RECENT ARTICLE in Britain’s Daily Mail ran with the title “I won’t let Daddy die: Girl of six raises £4,000 for life-saving drugs the NHS won’t provide.” When Britain’s National Health System said it would not pay for Tarceva, the drug her father needed to fight lung cancer, 6-year-old Chantelle Hill put up posters throughout her neighborhood asking for donations so she could buy the drug herself.

The Center for Medicine in the Public Interest | Fewer drugs, fewer seniors (http://www.cmpi.org/media-impact/2008-articles/fewer-drugs-fewer-seniors/ - broken link)

Socialized medicine? Didn't work in that case.

It is an issue that makes you think, though. Pass the majority of the costs onto those who have "specialty" diseases.
While the majority gain the benefits, the others can just....die or suffer?

Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Old 04-16-2008, 04:51 PM
Location: Tucson
42,835 posts, read 81,952,356 times
Reputation: 22814
You know, instead of doing it slowly, why don't they just spray us with something stronger and get it over with?!
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2021, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top