Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-21-2020, 11:02 PM
 
10,708 posts, read 5,651,721 times
Reputation: 10844

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by WRM20 View Post
There's nothing wrong with progressive tax rates, and they ensure that the lower paid have enough to live on.
How do progressive tax rates ensure this?

Quote:
With the increase in the standard deduction to $24,500 for a married couple, the number of people itemizing has dropped tremendously. The $10k limit for state and local taxes means rich folks don't get as many deductions. You would still have to have the deductions for businesses, including sole proprietors, or many businesses wouldn't make a profit at all after taxes. The only really difficult part there is what the depreciation period is for capital assets.
What’s difficult about it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-22-2020, 05:43 AM
 
15,398 posts, read 7,464,179 times
Reputation: 19333
Quote:
Originally Posted by TaxPhd View Post
What loopholes do the rich have?
Nothing the rest of us don't have, other than we don't have enough deductions to get past the standard amount, so we actually get a bigger deduction, percentage of income wise, than the rich.

The rich can also afford to pay accountants to carefully scrutinize everything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2020, 05:46 AM
 
15,398 posts, read 7,464,179 times
Reputation: 19333
Quote:
Originally Posted by TaxPhd View Post
How do progressive tax rates ensure this?


What’s difficult about it?
I can reword the first one to be "more likely to have enough to live on". If we have one rate, then it has to be high enough to raise the necessary revenue, and the poor end up being screwed.

Congress occasionally uses the depreciation periods for capital assets to encourage certain behaviors. We end up with too many choices, and people make mistakes in classification.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2020, 06:55 PM
 
11,025 posts, read 7,831,231 times
Reputation: 23702
Fidelity has now posted a message online stating that the deadline for 209 IRA contributions has been moved to July 15 along with the tax filing deadline as part of the first economic package that has already been approved.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:40 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top