Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-24-2008, 10:21 PM
 
Location: LA
19 posts, read 53,188 times
Reputation: 14

Advertisements



Richest by zip code:


Top 10 by income:


New York, NY 10004: $1,192,091

New York, NY:10011 $922,834

New York, NY: 10167 $863,843

New York, NY:10286 $721,000

Los Angeles, CA: $595,527

Miami Beach, FL 33109: $533,062

Jersey City, NJ 07399:$528,021

New York, NY 10165: $523,615

New York, NY 10105: $505,130

New York, NY 10112: $504,891

Los Angeles, CA 90067: $500,106

New York, NY 10110: $498,111



Top cities with households earning more than $200,000 per year:

1. New York City: 156,621

2. Los Angeles: 60,811

3. Chicago: 38,252

4. San Francisco: 29,723

5. Houston, TX 28,607


Number of Billionaires:

1. New York, NY: 81

2. San Fransisco, CA: 38

2. Los Angeles, CA: 32



Urban/Metropolitan areas with largest amount of millionaires

1. New York City Metropolitan Area: 769,899

2. Los Angeles Metropolitan Area: 301,889

3. Chicago Metro: 289,422



Highest Percentage by county:


1. Los Alamos, NM

2. Naples/Marco Island, FL

3. Fairfield County, CT

4. Vero Beach

5. Hilton Head Island, GA



Highest Percentage of Millionaires

1. Los Alamos, NM
2. Naples/Marco Island, FL
3. Fairfield County, CT
4. Vero Beach
5. Hilton Head Island, GA

By county:

1. Los Angeles County (262,000)
2. Cook County, IL (167,000)
3. Orange County, CA (113,000)
4. Maricopa County, AZ (106,000)
5. San Diego County, CA (100,000)


Counties by percentage:

In Middlesex County, Mass 1 in 22 is a millionaire..
In Orange County, CA 1 in 26 is a millionaire..
In Los Angeles County, CA 1 in 39 is a millionaire..
In Maricopa County, AZ 1 in 35 is a millionaire..
In San Diego County, CA 1 in 30 is a millionaire..
In Nassau County, NY 1 in 16 is a millionaire..
In Santa Clara County, CA 1 in 12 is a millionaire..

100 wealthiest zip codes in the United States
Top 101 zip codes with the highest 2004 average Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) for individuals (pop 1,000+)
TNS Global News Centre - Market Information & Research Reports
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-25-2008, 01:15 PM
 
Location: Manhattan
112 posts, read 325,806 times
Reputation: 35
Hmmm interesting. I looked through the entire list and most of the richest zip codes are in NY. I was suprised by the percentage in Los Alamos, NM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2008, 01:32 PM
 
Location: LA
19 posts, read 53,188 times
Reputation: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by Materialism View Post
Hmmm interesting. I looked through the entire list and most of the richest zip codes are in NY. I was suprised by the percentage in Los Alamos, NM.
I expected NY to be at the top but I never knew Los Alamos was wealthy??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2008, 03:35 PM
 
2,153 posts, read 5,536,261 times
Reputation: 655
Doesn't 1 mil in NY equal something like $100,000 in Kansas City? Of course those are going to be the "richest cities" that doesn't mean they aren't blowing through it on living expenses.

Unless the study takes that into account.


I was exaggerating a tad about the NY to KC ratio

Just wondering how things would differ if they figured living and general expenses into the equation. May not change things for those specific zip codes but surely it would for general areas.

For example: If you have to make $300,000 in NY just to have a standard of living that $50,000 gets you in the midwest. Does it truly matter that you are making $300,000? Once again, Im not sure of ratios, but I think standard of living also includes non measurable things such as paying $2,000 to rent a 300 sq. ft apt where somewhere else you could have a 2500 sq ft house for $2,000 a month.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2008, 11:19 AM
 
Location: San Diego
936 posts, read 3,189,690 times
Reputation: 467
Quote:
Originally Posted by bls5555 View Post
Doesn't 1 mil in NY equal something like $100,000 in Kansas City? Of course those are going to be the "richest cities" that doesn't mean they aren't blowing through it on living expenses.

Unless the study takes that into account.


I was exaggerating a tad about the NY to KC ratio

Just wondering how things would differ if they figured living and general expenses into the equation. May not change things for those specific zip codes but surely it would for general areas.

For example: If you have to make $300,000 in NY just to have a standard of living that $50,000 gets you in the midwest. Does it truly matter that you are making $300,000? Once again, Im not sure of ratios, but I think standard of living also includes non measurable things such as paying $2,000 to rent a 300 sq. ft apt where somewhere else you could have a 2500 sq ft house for $2,000 a month.

Well of course NYC is more expensive then Kansas city, look at the difference in lifestyle. Kansas City is a blah city with a blah income payout.
NYC is a spectacular city with a spectacular payout.

Spectacular cities attract spectacular jobs while blah cities attract blah jobs.

People move to one of these cities based on their level of sophistication, and the sophisticated ones will almost always choose NYC over Kansas City
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2008, 06:56 PM
 
5,816 posts, read 15,908,183 times
Reputation: 4741
Quote:
Originally Posted by SouthCali4LifeSD View Post
Well of course NYC is more expensive then Kansas city, look at the difference in lifestyle. Kansas City is a blah city with a blah income payout.
NYC is a spectacular city with a spectacular payout.

Spectacular cities attract spectacular jobs while blah cities attract blah jobs.

People move to one of these cities based on their level of sophistication, and the sophisticated ones will almost always choose NYC over Kansas City
I doubt that it's quite this simple. Anyway . . .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2008, 07:36 PM
 
Location: near bears but at least no snakes
26,656 posts, read 28,654,132 times
Reputation: 50525
In Middlesex County, Mass 1 in 22 is a millionaire..

I KNEW MA would be in there somewhere. Am I the only one left who isn't rich?
I think so because everyone else has moved out because they are sick of struggling. I choose to remain here and suffer with not being able to afford anything.

It's because it is such a beautiful state and there are gorgeous beaches and the history all around you is incredible. There is culture everywhere and fabulous nature. You can ski in winter and go to the beach in summer, the autumn is awesome, the spring is tender and lovely, the people (those who are left anyway) are great, and it is HOME.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2008, 08:40 PM
 
Location: in a house
5,835 posts, read 5,198,500 times
Reputation: 4890
Here, here! Don't worry, counting us makes four that are not millionaires living in Middlesex County!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2008, 06:43 PM
 
2,153 posts, read 5,536,261 times
Reputation: 655
Quote:
Originally Posted by SouthCali4LifeSD View Post
Well of course NYC is more expensive then Kansas city, look at the difference in lifestyle. Kansas City is a blah city with a blah income payout.
NYC is a spectacular city with a spectacular payout.

Spectacular cities attract spectacular jobs while blah cities attract blah jobs.

People move to one of these cities based on their level of sophistication, and the sophisticated ones will almost always choose NYC over Kansas City

haha. nice joke post. great stuff. positive rep for this one.

You have got to be kidding me.

Let me take 1 guess. You have NEVER been to Kansas City.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2008, 09:11 PM
 
6,334 posts, read 11,079,567 times
Reputation: 3085
I've been to Kansas City. I live there. I'll say this, they do make the most out of what they have here. When I hear people like Len Dawson and some members of City Hall claim that Kansas City is a "world class city" I have to wonder about their mental health...A decent regional city? Yes. World class city? Absolutely not.

The folks in Johnson County will be disappointed to learn they are not as high up on the food chain as they like to believe they are. I didn't see a single Kansas City area zip code on that list.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top