Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-09-2020, 10:42 AM
 
Location: Taipei
7,777 posts, read 10,160,922 times
Reputation: 4989

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by roodd279 View Post
Kind of sort of - but why would I pay taxes? If I have an opportunity to be one of the paid-but-not-working people - then I'm going to take it. So is everyone else.


Then what?
I would not. I would rather build a large fortune and pay for those people than just barely scrape by as one of those folks.

Look, we have to subsidize and support people in the bottom rung of the economy in some way, so UBI might be the most effective method, I'm not sure. But, in the case of Andrew Yang's proposal, it is to be paid for from the profits of companies who effectively use technology to reduce the number of jobs/workforce they support, then it does seem sensible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-09-2020, 10:53 AM
 
19,784 posts, read 18,079,394 times
Reputation: 17278
Quote:
Originally Posted by Therblig View Post
Again, no argument in the narrowest sense. But we've had something between overwhelming and excessive implementation of that mantra - a mantra being a single, exclusive idea that dispels all others - for several decades now, and it's passed into dogma and pseudoscience. The R's can think of nothing else. At all. And more or less trumpet that these days. I don't see the D's as any less committed to a strong business infrastructure... they just aren't obsessed to the point of frenzy and blindness over it.

Trickle-down and all its incontinent kin are nonsense... and that is something clearly proven by economic history. But, guess who clings to it like the last N95 mask in DC.

If we don't address the reality we've developed over the last forty years - massive erosion of jobs that are NOT going to return in any fashion - and our immediate future, which has been starkly previewed for us by the current crisis - a "strong business sector" won't matter nearly as much as you insist on.

A nation is not businesses. But no one following the right's bluster for the last decades would get that.
A free nation does not function without businesses. Without a strong business core - in short order there would be something akin to anarchy........no way to pay for the .gov sponsored items you love so much being problem 1.

Trickle-down was a fantastic success. If you'd like to argue that point I'm capable of being very specific.

_______

Right now you are playing the high brow left wing poet angle. Stow that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2020, 10:56 AM
 
3,346 posts, read 2,199,361 times
Reputation: 5723
Quote:
Originally Posted by EDS_ View Post
A free nation does not function without businesses.
Point to where I said otherwise. Anywhere on C-D.

Quote:
Trickle-down was a fantastic success. If you'd like to argue that point I'm capable of being very specific.
I don't engage in religious arguments.

Quote:
ight now you are playing the high brow left wing poet angle. Stow that.
Sorry I'm not restricting myself to conventional right dialectic. Self-serving circular logic bores me to tears.

(High brow. That's funny... are you saying you and the R's are committed to the lowbrow approach? I wouldn't disagree...)

Thanks for playing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2020, 11:15 AM
 
19,784 posts, read 18,079,394 times
Reputation: 17278
Quote:
Originally Posted by Therblig View Post
Point to where I said otherwise. Anywhere on C-D.


I don't engage in religious arguments.


Sorry I'm not restricting myself to conventional right dialectic. Self-serving circular logic bores me to tears.

(High brow. That's funny... are you saying you and the R's are committed to the lowbrow approach? I wouldn't disagree...)

Thanks for playing.
As I figured. You've got literally nothing but words. No economic argument at all.

I'm an atheist I don't make religious arguments. This angle is more proof, you've got nothing but poetry.


There are two specific historical examples of trickle down working brilliantly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2020, 11:40 AM
 
Location: Colorado Springs
4,944 posts, read 2,940,507 times
Reputation: 3805
Quote:
Originally Posted by skeddy View Post
Finland ended their basic income program after 2 years --- didn't work.
Finland did not have UBI. It created a welfare program.

"Finland’s basic income experiment didn’t test the removal of the work disincentive which conditional benefits create. It only slightly reduced them." https://medium.com/basic-income/what...l-54b8e5051f60
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2020, 11:45 AM
 
Location: Colorado Springs
4,944 posts, read 2,940,507 times
Reputation: 3805
Quote:
Originally Posted by EDS_ View Post

_________

I find it interesting that'd you'd brush of his argument via a technicality and make no case about why he is wrong.
I put the same amount of effort into my rebuttal as the other person did with their argument.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2020, 12:19 PM
 
19,784 posts, read 18,079,394 times
Reputation: 17278
Quote:
Originally Posted by BornintheSprings View Post
I put the same amount of effort into my rebuttal as the other person did with their argument.
What you did is just another dodge. Accidentally or not the other guy's points you rebutted with the Strawman charge were solid.

At the very minimum his point must be answered by people on your side and you didn't even try.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2020, 12:25 PM
 
Location: Colorado Springs
4,944 posts, read 2,940,507 times
Reputation: 3805
Quote:
Originally Posted by EDS_ View Post
What you did is just another dodge. Accidentally or not the other guy's points you rebutted with the Strawman charge were solid.

At the very minimum his point must be answered by people on your side and you didn't even try.
UBI is not a partisan issue. Conservative economists like Milton Friedman support it. Thomas Paine at the founding of our country supported it called it a citizens dividend.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2020, 01:01 PM
 
19,784 posts, read 18,079,394 times
Reputation: 17278
Quote:
Originally Posted by BornintheSprings View Post
UBI is not a partisan issue. Conservative economists like Milton Friedman support it. Thomas Paine at the founding of our country supported it called it a citizens dividend.
I'm the one who mentioned Friedman and UBI. For the record he wasn't especially for government largess. He's points about UBI were that the costs would be more easily trackable and controllable.

Paine was a socialist. He's figuratively on the masthead of most socialist groups around the world.

___________________

The problems would be myriad.

1. What's the $ threshold? Would that be a federalized number or vary per state.....as NY has by far the worst per $ buying power metrics in the country would you pay NY UBI users more than Texas? Tennessee?
2. Is there a time horizon? Pay someone for 1 year, 5?, life?
3. How precisely would your side manage the negative bits. Like the work disincentives?
4. Would you force drug testing?

__________________

I could be persuaded that a UBI as a replacement for nearly all federal, state and local social welfare spending might be worth consideration.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2020, 01:05 PM
 
Location: Colorado Springs
4,944 posts, read 2,940,507 times
Reputation: 3805
Quote:
Originally Posted by EDS_ View Post

Paine was a socialist.
Ummm ok...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:27 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top