Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-30-2020, 04:09 PM
 
Location: Spain
12,722 posts, read 7,569,884 times
Reputation: 22634

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaliRestoration View Post
Well, we also have to take into account Blue state governors shoving Covid-19 patients into nursing/care homes as well.

We really want to get this right when we make our comparisons.
So you don't actually know what percentage of Americans fall into your lucky category of young, thin, and healthy?

I'll also guess that's a yes in that you're comparing that subset of healthier Americans' death rate from covid-19 to the entire population of flu fatalities to say the fatality rates are similar?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-01-2020, 08:10 AM
 
6,089 posts, read 4,985,182 times
Reputation: 5985
Quote:
Originally Posted by lieqiang View Post
So you don't actually know what percentage of Americans fall into your lucky category of young, thin, and healthy?
Who cares? Those are simply the risk factors that can "possibly" increase mortality.

But the actual statistics show us if you're simply below the age of 55, your survival is now on PAR or LOWER than the common flu.

https://ourworldindata.org/mortality...ovid-19-by-age

According to the statistics, if you're below the age of 30, the mortality rate is basically 0%.

Not just in the US, but in Italy, South Korea, Spain, and even China.

So being old is the only real factor that shows up in the actual mortality rate with any real significance, and in the US it should show up far less (by about 25%) if Governors in CA, NY, MI,NJ,NY did not shove Covid-19 patients into nursing homes.

You really need to do MORE reading and LESS posting on this topic. You're out of your league.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2020, 10:42 AM
 
26,191 posts, read 21,574,273 times
Reputation: 22772
More younger people getting infected brings the overall death rate down but doesn’t change the death rate for older folks who contract Covid as the youngest folks are helping spread it. That’s the reality of the situation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2020, 10:48 AM
 
Location: NJ
31,771 posts, read 40,680,213 times
Reputation: 24590
every year we have some illness that go around. "oh this stomach bug is going around" and you know that a lot of people catch it. we never really give it much thought. how do these things go away? is it a matter of enough getting it providing herd immunity?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2020, 01:04 PM
 
6,089 posts, read 4,985,182 times
Reputation: 5985
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lowexpectations View Post
More younger people getting infected brings the overall death rate
Uh, it's not just the death rate. The overall deaths have been dropping for 3 months straight.

The old are susceptible to it, like any bad flu strain. They should take precautions, and the people around them should as well, just as we've done for decades.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainNJ View Post
every year we have some illness that go around. "oh this stomach bug is going around" and you know that a lot of people catch it. we never really give it much thought. how do these things go away? is it a matter of enough getting it providing herd immunity?
We've had bad flu seasons where 50,000 to 80,000 have died (very recent). We didn't shut down the economy and society overall. We certainly didn't put flu patients into nursing homes and cause far more death than there needed to be. The decision making process of the governors in CA, NY, MI, PA, and NJ is head scratching.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2020, 01:41 PM
 
26,191 posts, read 21,574,273 times
Reputation: 22772
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaliRestoration View Post
Uh, it's not just the death rate. The overall deaths have been dropping for 3 months straight.
Overall deaths have been going up everyday. Maybe you mean number of new daily deaths? In which case is explainable by the large increase in younger infections and prior to that the lockdown and drop in infection rates

Quote:
The old are susceptible to it, like any bad flu strain. They should take precautions, and the people around them should as well, just as we've done for decades.
But older folks can’t control who other people are around ie the younger population. There is no doubt a large spread of the virus in the younger population increases the chances of exposure for the older population
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2020, 05:05 PM
 
Location: Niceville, FL
13,258 posts, read 22,828,258 times
Reputation: 16416
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaliRestoration View Post
Who cares? Those are simply the risk factors that can "possibly" increase mortality.

But the actual statistics show us if you're simply below the age of 55, your survival is now on PAR or LOWER than the common flu.
It's not just about not dying; it's also about being able to continuing to enjoy a lifestyle that makes life worth living. I want to run another marathon and one of the complications of surviving Covid can be lung damage that would make that impossible. I like to eat a wide variety of things and that are also credible reports of Covid survivors developing diabetes, which has its whole slew of life long problems. And hey, I managed to avoid mono in my youth and would like to avoid a disease like Covid that can cause similar bad fatigue problems for months.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2020, 06:04 PM
 
Location: Spain
12,722 posts, read 7,569,884 times
Reputation: 22634
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaliRestoration View Post
Who cares? Those are simply the risk factors that can "possibly" increase mortality.
So when you compare fatality rates and note one is comparable to the other you don't care whether what you're saying makes any sense or provides any useful analysis because you have no idea about most of the factors that go into it.


Quote:
Originally Posted by CaliRestoration View Post
But the actual statistics show us if you're simply below the age of 55, your survival is now on PAR or LOWER than the common flu.
Right, but since we don't live in some fictional YoungPeopleLandia and 30% of our population is over 55 this information isn't very useful.


Quote:
Originally Posted by CaliRestoration View Post
You really need to do MORE reading and LESS posting on this topic. You're out of your league.
I've read the same things you've read, I just don't use them to make boneheaded apples versus oranges arguments like you do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2020, 06:12 PM
 
Location: Spain
12,722 posts, read 7,569,884 times
Reputation: 22634
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaliRestoration View Post
We've had bad flu seasons where 50,000 to 80,000 have died (very recent). We didn't shut down the economy and society overall.
We're at what about 130k deaths from covid-19 so far, despite shutting down the economy and the far more extreme measures taken all over the country.

If we shut down the country like this in flu season we'd have had far less flu deaths.
If we didn't shut down the country like this with covid-19 we'd have had far more covid-19 deaths.

So yet again you're drawing nonsensical conclusions from what you read. Reading is easy, it's forming a coherent, meaningful conclusion from it that escapes you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2020, 06:42 PM
 
5,907 posts, read 4,428,919 times
Reputation: 13442
Quote:
Originally Posted by lieqiang View Post
We're at what about 130k deaths from covid-19 so far, despite shutting down the economy and the far more extreme measures taken all over the country.

If we shut down the country like this in flu season we'd have had far less flu deaths.
If we didn't shut down the country like this with covid-19 we'd have had far more covid-19 deaths.

So yet again you're drawing nonsensical conclusions from what you read. Reading is easy, it's forming a coherent, meaningful conclusion from it that escapes you.
People really seem to not be able to understand this concept.

And the other thing is that the flu normally peaks in December, February, and March. So, it essentially didn’t overlap with COVID this year. Next year, we could be rolling into a situation where they spike during similar time frames, which will put tremendous strain on the system and cause deaths to pile as supplies, staff, and hospital space runs low.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top