Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-09-2020, 10:16 PM
 
1,967 posts, read 1,305,971 times
Reputation: 586

Advertisements

Let’s update our nation’s rail, river, and canal transportation.

U.S. federal and state’s governments subsidize Amtrak, a quasi-government corporation; Its entire stock is owned by the federal government and it operates less than 800 miles of track nation-wide. Amtrak doesn’t own some of the track it operates.

USA’s railroads are 2nd or 3d rate in comparison to railroads of many other nations. USA’s passenger and freight trains move much slower and much less safely. There’s need for greater subsidy to update our roadbeds, signal and control technology. I would suppose the railroad corporations and our nation’s economy would benefit if railroad corporations and/or states owned sidings, rail yards, and stations; (stations are in effect similar to a siding or a rail yard). But Amtrak would own and controlled all, or almost all the tracks they operate.

Amtrak would control traffic somewhat in the manner as FAA administrates and controls air traffic. They’d operate the tracks in a similar manner as toll roads are operated. If a state chooses not to fully contribute their share per mile attributed to maintaining the tracks and supporting technology of Amtrak tracks within their jurisdictions, their intrastate traffic will be charged a compensating higher toll rate per mile.

Amtrak’s decisions to subsidize the building of additional and/or parallel modern high-speed right-of-ways would be determined primarily by the need for safety and the second consideration for likelihood of eventually recovering the additional cost and interest being invested within portions of Amtrak routes within the states jurisfdictions. The additional costs of exceptionally high-speed routes would justify greater toll rates charged to higher-speed traffic.
States disagreeing with Amtrak’s decisions regarding building or updating routes, could issue their own bonds to greater subsidize the creation or updating of sections or entire routes within their jurisdictions. The increased toll revenues derived from those portions of routes subsidized by additional state bonds, would be earmarked to first repay those state bond holders.

Respectfully, Supposn
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-09-2020, 10:18 PM
 
17,874 posts, read 15,925,121 times
Reputation: 11659
Who uses canals anymore?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2020, 10:20 PM
 
Location: southern california
61,288 posts, read 87,384,526 times
Reputation: 55562
That is stuff you would do if you had people who would work for free or almost nothing or if the USA could use another 60 trillion of debt
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2020, 12:24 AM
 
1,967 posts, read 1,305,971 times
Reputation: 586
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJ Brazen_3133 View Post
Who uses canals anymore?
NJ Brazen_3133, I couldn’t answer your question, so I googled for an answer. I’m not proud of my ignorance, but it's shameful not to seek information that readily available.

I googled “European canal and river cargo industries”. This was the very first link I obtained:
https://stockcargo.eu/waterways-barge-transport/ :
The link explains the commercial advantages of shipping bulk cargo by inland waterways. They don’t do it because it’s romantic, but rather because it’s cost effective. But it does require governments to better support their own domestic industries.

Respectfully, Supposn
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2020, 12:51 AM
 
1,967 posts, read 1,305,971 times
Reputation: 586
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huckleberry3911948 View Post
That is stuff you would do if you had people who would work for free or almost nothing or if the USA could use another 60 trillion of debt
Huckleberry3911948, I suppose you can believe that.

But I suppose governments’ support their canal and river infrastructures because it’s beneficial to their economy; enterprises use waterway shiping of their bulk cargoes because it’s cost effective; other enterprises profit by providing boat or barge shipping services.

But maybe the rest of the world is stupid and only Huckleberry3911948 is knowledgeable. You’ll enjoy laughing at this commercial shipper’s claims.
Refer to https://stockcargo.eu/waterways-barge-transport/ .

Respectfully, Supposn
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2020, 01:42 AM
 
Location: Silicon Valley
7,643 posts, read 4,589,722 times
Reputation: 12703
Sounds good man. Let's do it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2020, 07:18 AM
 
5,145 posts, read 3,076,394 times
Reputation: 11023
Shovel ready projects — but nobody wants to pick up a shovel. Can’t we just simulate progress and display it on a monitor somewhere?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2020, 07:58 AM
 
Location: Spain
12,722 posts, read 7,567,076 times
Reputation: 22634
Quote:
Originally Posted by Supposn View Post
But maybe the rest of the world is stupid and only Huckleberry3911948 is knowledgeable. You’ll enjoy laughing at this commercial shipper’s claims.
Refer to https://stockcargo.eu/waterways-barge-transport/
So because Huckleberry3911948 disagrees with you on this barge thing, everyone else in the world must be on your side therefore isolating Huckleberry3911948 as the lone dissenting voice?

You sure swung for the fences right off the bat in the logical fallacy homerun derby.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2020, 11:59 AM
 
Location: Wooster, Ohio
4,139 posts, read 3,044,203 times
Reputation: 7274
The Great Flood of 1913 wiped out Ohio's canal system. It had been declining before that, so there was no thought of rebuilding it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2020, 12:01 PM
 
88 posts, read 53,710 times
Reputation: 254
When gasoline gets to $10 or so a gallon, then you may find more support for your ideas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:18 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top