U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-27-2020, 08:44 AM
 
Location: 0.83 Atmospheres
11,382 posts, read 10,438,521 times
Reputation: 11755

Advertisements

Not surprised. Most economists I have heard recently expected this, saying that they thought The Fed would let inflation get to 5% before intervention.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/feds-po..._copyURL_share

‘The Federal Reserve unanimously approved on Thursday a new strategy that will effectively set aside a practice it has followed for more than three decades to pre-emptively lift interest rates to head off higher inflation.‘
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-27-2020, 08:55 AM
 
7,469 posts, read 6,044,894 times
Reputation: 16627
Translation: Party on.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2020, 09:02 AM
 
12,026 posts, read 10,611,857 times
Reputation: 11113
They never really paid attention to inflation, whether it was the government's measure or the real world, and has stated in the recent past that the inflation measures are wrong. They've responded to the stock market as their primary indicator, mainly of leveraging.

average 2% inflation rate target

They've been above 2 percent four of the last five years as Alliance-Bernstein as noted. If they included the things suggested by the Fed in recent years, such as housing, it would've been well above 4 percent.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2020, 09:22 AM
 
3,938 posts, read 2,037,408 times
Reputation: 8873
This is a foolish announcement in many ways. Several economic studies of the Fed’s ZIRP and QE programs of the past decade show that the unintended consequences include:

Lower overall economic growth
Decreased consumer spending by the middle class and retirees
Misallocation of capital by businesses (i.e. share buybacks instead of machinery or hiring)
Perpetuation of “zombie” companies that should be dissolved/bankrupt

But to hell with all of that, we will get a S&P at 4K.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2020, 09:38 AM
 
Location: Brawndo-Thirst-Mutilator-Nation
21,257 posts, read 22,160,846 times
Reputation: 18658
That means interest-rates will be at zero/near-zero for 15 years, as opposed to the originally planned 10.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2020, 09:47 AM
 
12,026 posts, read 10,611,857 times
Reputation: 11113
Interest rates aren't important at this point since they're still doing 3 trillion dollars a year in QE. The Fed won't look at interest rates until QE has stopped. US, Europe, Japan, and China are expected to buy 28 trillion dollars in assets in 2020 and 2021.

They could've chosen a different approach like the Fed has done before by setting a 2 percent or higher floor on rates for fixed-income assets while doing QE. Setting it to zero or below indicates that a large portion of portfolios (40 percent or more) is subject to cashing out. QE will have to done forever, and reach an endgame at some point because it keeps having to get bigger and bigger to support the economy.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2020, 09:49 AM
 
Location: 0.83 Atmospheres
11,382 posts, read 10,438,521 times
Reputation: 11755
Quote:
Originally Posted by tickyul View Post
That means interest-rates will be at zero/near-zero for 15 years, as opposed to the originally planned 10.
That all depends on inflation. The Fed hasn’t even been able to hit their target 2% (I know that there are people who don’t buy that number, but this is a constant metric that we are using) after the last round of QE. If it does go up this time, and there are reasons to believe it will, rates will have to climb.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2020, 09:56 AM
 
5,782 posts, read 3,889,468 times
Reputation: 13033
Pressure is on, Powell. For the sake of the world, do not fail.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2020, 10:02 AM
 
16,143 posts, read 14,656,767 times
Reputation: 14580
All the CD knashing of teeth noted this is a really good move. And frankly it's not a big deal......The Fed simply adjusted written policy formalizing what they were destined to do.


After the recent GDP contraction The Fed. was simply not going to raise short rates in attempts ward off inflationary pressures seen over a quarter. The risk of setting off a new spate of deflation is simply too great.

In other words after a bust it'd be uttely counterproductive to go on an inflation jihad over a hot quarter.

Last edited by EDS_; 08-27-2020 at 10:14 AM..
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2020, 10:14 AM
 
16,143 posts, read 14,656,767 times
Reputation: 14580
Quote:
Originally Posted by lchoro View Post
They never really paid attention to inflation, whether it was the government's measure or the real world, and has stated in the recent past that the inflation measures are wrong. They've responded to the stock market as their primary indicator, mainly of leveraging.

average 2% inflation rate target

They've been above 2 percent four of the last five years as Alliance-Bernstein as noted. If they included the things suggested by the Fed in recent years, such as housing, it would've been well above 4 percent.

One of my best friends was a research economist at The Dallas Fed. for a couple of decades, running the department for a long time.

He'd say your thesis statement is absurd. The Fed. pays constant attention to inflation/deflation.


___________

What inflation measures did The Fed. claim were wrong?
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2023, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top