Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-08-2022, 07:37 AM
 
10,609 posts, read 5,659,867 times
Reputation: 18905

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thatsright19 View Post

If someone fails their degree and doesn’t have the earnings boost, and all the cost, or never landed in their feild, how long is sufficient to punish someone? It could easily be reviewed by a financial expert or bankruptcy attorney to determine when people need relief just like they do in other situations.
Actions have consequences. By cancelling their debt, you deny them the dignity of working their way out of the hole they, themselves, dug.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-08-2022, 07:43 AM
 
5,907 posts, read 4,437,936 times
Reputation: 13447
Quote:
Originally Posted by RationalExpectations View Post
Student loan bankruptcy being (mostly) barred is a wonderful thing. I knew people long ago whose plan, at 18 years of age, was to borrow as much as possible in Federally Insured Student Loans throughout a lengthy college tenure with the intent of filing for bankruptcy protection upon graduation.

I know one in particular who, after graduation, took wonderful trip to Nepal, and wrote back to Sallie Mae that he had decided to become a Tibetan Buddhist Monk and live a life of poverty in Nepal with no income. With no income for the rest of his life, he wrote, he'd not be able to pay a penny of his student loans. But he did profuse thank them for the wonderful college experience.

It is that type of moral hazard we must guard against.

Oh - that Buddhist Monk? He recently retired from Goldman Sachs.
Fraud is fraud. It’s why bankruptcy is usually reviewed by a financial expert and/or judge.

There’s morale hazard in every type of bankruptcy. The same types of thing happen with credit cards, cars, people owning homes they shouldn’t, and business loans.

Systems can be designed to punish the bad actors while also protecting those that may actually need and deserve bankruptcy protection on their student loans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2022, 07:47 AM
 
5,907 posts, read 4,437,936 times
Reputation: 13447
Quote:
Originally Posted by RationalExpectations View Post
Actions have consequences. By cancelling their debt, you deny them the dignity of working their way out of the hole they, themselves, dug.
Do you feel the same for business owners that take a risk and fail?


I’d also ask if those consequences should extend to the lender? Their lack of decision process and review of risk by blanket lending could be improved if the risk hadn’t been transferred off the schools to start with and then off the government as well.

Last edited by Thatsright19; 03-08-2022 at 07:56 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2022, 07:55 AM
 
10,609 posts, read 5,659,867 times
Reputation: 18905
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roselvr View Post
I'll be shocked if Biden gets rid of $10k per loan. He surely will not forgive the whole thing, and why should he?
Faced with losing the House and Senate in the next election, he will do something to buy the votes of those deep in student debt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2022, 08:41 AM
 
Location: NJ
23,877 posts, read 33,601,389 times
Reputation: 30786
Quote:
Originally Posted by RationalExpectations View Post
Faced with losing the House and Senate in the next election, he will do something to buy the votes of those deep in student debt.


Well we're all waiting to see which one of us will be right on what he will do. He's backed himself into a corner.

I didn't vote for him either time he was in office.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2022, 09:37 AM
 
Location: Shawnee-on-Delaware, PA
8,086 posts, read 7,461,104 times
Reputation: 16357
Quote:
Originally Posted by RationalExpectations View Post
Faced with losing the House and Senate in the next election, he will do something to buy the votes of those deep in student debt.
My son said he voted for Biden because he thought he would forgive student loan debt (not that he's in deep debt). Only a kid would fall for that, and I think my son learned his lesson. But plenty of kids will fall for it every time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2022, 11:25 AM
 
Location: Honolulu/DMV Area/NYC
30,655 posts, read 18,263,167 times
Reputation: 34530
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thatsright19 View Post
Spare me the kids these days bull**** please.

The cherry on top was you helping or paying YOUR kids off. You were grumbling about people wanting handouts and kids not wanting responsibility or something?


And as far as bankruptcy, I’m not going to get too far into it because there was another student loan thread about 10 threads down past the 8 doomsday threads….but student loan bankruptcy being (mostly) barred is another reason the system is toxic and broken.

People declare bankruptcy every day with credit cards. Cards they racked up with clothes, vacations, Entertainment, experiences, ect that can never be taken from them. People fail businesses and are relieved. Why? Because sometimes a fresh start is reasonably warranted. Someone failing to launch in their career, how long should they be financially hamstrung and punished? 10 years? 20? 40? Obviously this would be carefully limited and be monitored by a bankruptcy judge, but the system we have now distorts risk, cost, ect and is an abomination.
I'm torn. On the one hand, it doesn't seem to make sense that you can discharge credit card, medical, personal loan, utility, and other debt via bankruptcy but not student loan debt. On the other hand, the average student loan debt is significantly higher than the average debt of what is generally dischargeable via bankruptcy. We're talking about almost $40k in the average student loan debt (even the median student loan debt is close to $20k) vs. $2.5k for average medical debt vs. $6.3k for average credit card debt from what I'm finding. So there is a degree of magnitude in difference.

Some folks may look at this and say that the significantly higher, on average, student loan debt is all the more reason why such be dischargeable in bankruptcy as crushing student loan debt (or any crushing debt) can make it all the more difficult to lead productive lives. But, from where I stand--and apart from the conversation over who is going to pay for this all--the reason why I remain opposed to allowing student loan debt to be dischargeable as a general matter is that the average student loan debt is no where close to being the cost of higher education. Indeed, there are state/city schools that offer education at significantly lower rates than private or out of state schools. I do not think that taxpayers should foot the bill for people's unnecessary financial decisions.

Now, understanding that what I wrote above isn't inherently true for every student loan borrower, a compromise I'd be willing to consider would be a cap in the amount of student loan debt one would be allowed to have discharged in bankruptcy. But this would be an amount far lower than the average student loan debt amount (probably less than $10k).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2022, 08:51 PM
 
Location: Boston
20,153 posts, read 9,043,504 times
Reputation: 18820
Biden can extend the pause but he can't relieve student loans, Congress can, but not the President. Even Pelosi acknowledged that.

“The President can’t do it…That’s not even a discussion,” Pelosi said.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2022, 11:15 PM
 
Location: NJ
23,877 posts, read 33,601,389 times
Reputation: 30786
Quote:
Originally Posted by skeddy View Post
Biden can extend the pause but he can't relieve student loans, Congress can, but not the President. Even Pelosi acknowledged that.

“The President can’t do it…That’s not even a discussion,” Pelosi said.


Thanks, I had not seen that anyone even gave the answer on whether he could or not in every article I've read. I didn't think he could.



Quote:
Originally Posted by prospectheightsresident View Post
I'm torn. On the one hand, it doesn't seem to make sense that you can discharge credit card, medical, personal loan, utility, and other debt via bankruptcy but not student loan debt. On the other hand, the average student loan debt is significantly higher than the average debt of what is generally dischargeable via bankruptcy. We're talking about almost $40k in the average student loan debt (even the median student loan debt is close to $20k) vs. $2.5k for average medical debt vs. $6.3k for average credit card debt from what I'm finding. So there is a degree of magnitude in difference.

Some folks may look at this and say that the significantly higher, on average, student loan debt is all the more reason why such be dischargeable in bankruptcy as crushing student loan debt (or any crushing debt) can make it all the more difficult to lead productive lives. But, from where I stand--and apart from the conversation over who is going to pay for this all--the reason why I remain opposed to allowing student loan debt to be dischargeable as a general matter is that the average student loan debt is no where close to being the cost of higher education. Indeed, there are state/city schools that offer education at significantly lower rates than private or out of state schools. I do not think that taxpayers should foot the bill for people's unnecessary financial decisions.

Now, understanding that what I wrote above isn't inherently true for every student loan borrower, a compromise I'd be willing to consider would be a cap in the amount of student loan debt one would be allowed to have discharged in bankruptcy. But this would be an amount far lower than the average student loan debt amount (probably less than $10k).

The thing is that some student loans can still be discharged on bankruptcy. It isn't popular because it's time consuming. It's easier if the person is elderly, living on a fixed income or disabled, I have seen younger people that decided to not use their degree, have it discharged.

I posted about one guy who had a law degree that decided he didn't want to do that any more when COVID hit. He successfully got his loans zeroed out. His grew to $400k.

There's something called the Brunner test, if that can be satisfied, loans will be discharged in bankruptcy.

You have to read the first article to get the guys whole story. Obviously he didn't need an attorney because that's what his degree was in.


An Interview With Kevin Rosenberg Where He Explains How He Successfully Discharged His Student Loans In Bankruptcy Court
What's amazing about Rosenberg's story is that he did this on his own without the assistance of an attorney.

Quote:
Last week, the Wall Street Journal featured the story of Kevin Rosenberg (also covered here), a former attorney who did what every student loan debt slave thought was almost impossible — he convinced the bankruptcy court to discharge his student loans in full.


What was your total student loan debt at the time of your bankruptcy?

In total about $400,000. $220,000 were federal loans and $180,000 were private loans but the combined principal was around $200,000 total without deducting the payments I made


NY Bankruptcy Judge's Ruling Could Help People Get Rid of Student Loans
The ruling hinges on an obscure test in bankruptcy law connected to a debtor's ability to pay

Quote:
A lawyer managed to get own his massive, years-old student debt thrown out in New York bankruptcy court this week, after he was able to prove the burden was so huge he could never afford to pay it.

Kevin Rosenberg took out student loans from 1993 to 1996 to pay for college, spent five years in the Navy, then took out more loans to attend law school from 2001 to 2004.

By the time he was done, he owed more than $116,000 -- but over the years, that ballooned to more than $221,000 as of last November, according to court papers.

In his bankruptcy filing, Rosenberg said that he was earning so little, and owed so much, that he was left with negative income of $1,500 a month.

The company, in an Oct. 2019 brief, argued that Rosenberg did not meet any of the prongs of the Brunner test -- in part, they said, because he had chosen not to earn a living as an attorney and take advantage of the education he borrowed to fund.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2022, 12:35 AM
 
Location: California
37,151 posts, read 42,250,817 times
Reputation: 35032
If we forgive them we can't give them to people anymore, that's just an uncomfortable fact nobody wants to talk about. I don't know what's going to happen but I assume most people will just start paying.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top