Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-16-2008, 07:56 AM
 
Location: Sitting on a bar stool. Guinness in hand.
4,428 posts, read 6,508,145 times
Reputation: 1721

Advertisements

Let me just through this out there. OK so I see that a lot of people on CD's forums want to abolish the federal reserve. OK I'm an open minded guy and maybe will to go for that. But I was born, heck most or all of us were born after the fed was created. So I don't thing most of use know a life without it. So tell me in as much detail as you can what are the possible upsides and downsides to riding ourselves of the fed.
Let me stipulate, that I would like to heard mostly economic impacts not political rhetoric.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-16-2008, 08:08 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,464,288 times
Reputation: 27720
Go buy a copy of "The Creature from Jekyll Island" . That book will tell you everything you want to know about the Federal Reserve..created by the bankers, run by the bankers and keeps the bankers interests at the top at all times.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2008, 09:39 AM
 
3,459 posts, read 5,792,832 times
Reputation: 6677
I'll post an opinion later on, but want to post an observation for now. Ron Paul started questioning Bernacke this morning, and CNBC cut away from his questions for commentary. As soon as Bernacke started talking, they quickly cut off the commentary and went back to him.

I'll let everybody come to their own conclusions on it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2008, 11:21 AM
 
Location: Heartland Florida
9,324 posts, read 26,745,539 times
Reputation: 5038
The FED is a scam. The faster we reform it the better. Why can't it be controlled by the Congress...oh wait that's a bad idea. Just phase it out then. The best replacement is a commodity-based money created through domestic investment. The FED was designed purely to take the real property of all Americans and give control to the world's elite. The system has to fail as it depends on continually increasing growth. With a fixed money supply we get:

Upsides: 1) No inflation 2) No more real estate bubbles 3) High savings rate 4) More investment in innovation 5) More transfer of wealth to the working (productive) people 6) No more national debt 7) Low energy prices 8) Higher standard of living

Downsides : NONE
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2008, 11:30 AM
 
Location: Texas
5,012 posts, read 7,871,881 times
Reputation: 5698
Quote:
Originally Posted by tallrick View Post
The FED is a scam. The faster we reform it the better. Why can't it be controlled by the Congress...oh wait that's a bad idea. Just phase it out then. The best replacement is a commodity-based money created through domestic investment. The FED was designed purely to take the real property of all Americans and give control to the world's elite. The system has to fail as it depends on continually increasing growth. With a fixed money supply we get:

Upsides: 1) No inflation 2) No more real estate bubbles 3) High savings rate 4) More investment in innovation 5) More transfer of wealth to the working (productive) people 6) No more national debt 7) Low energy prices 8) Higher standard of living

Downsides : NONE
Our government owns no gold to back the new currency with, if we put an end to the federal reserve notes. We'd see massive deflation. That being said, I'll take deflation over debt serfdom any day. What we need is competing currencies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2008, 11:39 AM
 
Location: Heartland Florida
9,324 posts, read 26,745,539 times
Reputation: 5038
So the Government is basically worthless? I would think that the miles of roads, military, national parks, vast mineral wealth and the Government itself could be used as a commodity to back up new Government notes? They collect income tax, that would be a dividend on the investment, or is the whole system fundamentally worthless? The gold standard is a bad idea in today's world, I do support partial gold and silver reserves to back up circulating money though.

Competing currencies would complicate trade unless they were tied to a national standard currency.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2008, 12:00 PM
 
Location: Sitting on a bar stool. Guinness in hand.
4,428 posts, read 6,508,145 times
Reputation: 1721
Quote:
Originally Posted by tallrick View Post
Upsides: 1) No inflation 2) No more real estate bubbles 3) High savings rate 4) More investment in innovation 5) More transfer of wealth to the working (productive) people 6) No more national debt 7) Low energy prices 8) Higher standard of living

Downsides : NONE
Can you be more specific on the whys such upside would happen? What type of shifts would happen to inhibit or to encourage these results?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2008, 12:02 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,159,948 times
Reputation: 21738
Quote:
Originally Posted by tallrick View Post
Upsides: 1) No inflation
Um, sure, that's why the inflation rate in the 1800s averaged 35%, right?


Read and weep

Year Avg Inflation
1800 51%
1801 50%
1802 43%
1803 45%
1804 45%
1805 45%
1806 47%
1807 44%
1808 48%
1809 47%
1810 47%
1811 50%
1812 51%
1813 58%
1814 63%
1815 63%
1816 55%
1817 51%
1818 48%
1819 46%
1820 46%
1821 42%
1822 63%
1823 40%
1824 40%
1825 36%
1826 33%
1827 34%
1828 34%
1829 34%
1830 33%
1831 32%
1832 32%
1833 32%
1834 30%
1835 29%
1836 30%
1837 31%
1838 33%
1839 34%
1840 32%
1841 32%
1842 30%
1843 31%
1844 29%
1845 28%
1846 28%
1847 28%
1848 27%
1849 28%
1850 26%
1851 25%
1852 25%
1853 25%
1854 25%
1855 25%
1856 27%
1857 28%
1858 27%
1859 28%
1860 26%
1861 27%
1862 27%
1863 27%
1864 30%
1865 37%
1866 47%
1867 27%
1868 46%
1869 44%
1870 42%
1871 40%
1872 40%
1873 38%
1874 36%
1875 36%
1876 36%
1877 34%
1878 33%
1879 32%
1880 32%
1881 29%
1882 28%
1883 29%
1884 29%
1885 29%
1886 28%
1887 27%
1888 27%
1889 27%
1890 27%
1891 27%
1892 27%
1893 27%
1894 27%
1895 27%
1896 27%
1897 26%
1898 25%
1899 25%
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2008, 12:17 PM
 
3,459 posts, read 5,792,832 times
Reputation: 6677
A while ago another poster (Philip?) suggested something along the lines of pegging the dollar to units of energy, which I thought was a pretty decent idea.

One thing that I liked about the idea was that it spreads out the portfolio and makes it harder to corner the market.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2008, 07:29 PM
 
Location: Stanwood, Washington
658 posts, read 830,813 times
Reputation: 172
Economic impact:

Short-term: Banks scramble for overnight loans and develop a system with eachother to meet the need. Account holders encounter no change in services, although there is a small panic run on funds. The stock market dips 33% in one week, then regains to the level before the Fed's elimination. The White House temporarily freezes prices on all CPI-related goods to reduce opportunists taking advantage of the emerging banking market.

Medium-term: Inflation is 0% due to the re-adoption of the gold standard. Worthless paper money and cheap coins are replaced by metals and gold certificates worth what they say they are worth. Trade is normalized using gold for day-to-day transactions. Electronic transactions fall in popularity. Visa and MC eventually concede to the purchasing power of Americans and accept gold deposits as payment.

Long-term: Inflation remains 0% because gold is tied to the cost of living, which does not increase because the Fed cannot make electronic money out of thin air, which used to automatically make money less valuable, with less buying power (when there is a greater supply of any "thing", each of them is worth less due to decreased demand). COLA increases are eliminated as unneccessary. Capitalism prospers. America wonders why it paid the Fed, a private company, a portion of their money to do what Americans did for themselves with their own money, not play money, long before the Fed was created on Jeckyl Island.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:32 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top