Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-28-2008, 10:56 AM
 
27,214 posts, read 46,745,966 times
Reputation: 15667

Advertisements

Total comp for chief execs at S&P 500 companies rose 22% last year; operating earnings at those businesses down nearly 6%



By Mark Bruno
October 20, 2008 3:32 PM ET

Despite deteriorating economic conditions—and expectations that many companies would pay out less to their top officers—chief executives at publicly traded companies of all sizes have seen an increase in their compensation.

According to a study of CEO pay released by the Corporate Library today, the median total pay package for chief executives at almost 2,000 companies was just over $2 million last year, a 7.5% uptick from the year before.

The increase, while one of the lowest in recent years, was still a surprise, noted Paul Hodgson, senior research associate at the Corporate Library, given the economic developments that began crippling companies in the finance and housing industries last year.

“We figured that the across-the-board numbers would have been flat, at the very least, or might have even gone in reverse,” he said. “But at many companies, particularly large corporations, it appeared to be business as usual.”

To his point, the Corporate Library research found that companies in the S&P 500 awarded their CEOs total compensation packages that increased by a median of 22% in 2007.

That largesse doesn’t jibe with the overall performance of the companies. Operating earnings of S&P 500 companies actually decreased by 5.9% during the year, according to Standard & Poor’s data.

The bump in pay, Mr. Hodgson said, was driven mostly by stock option gains that top executives cashed in last year.

Likewise, midcap companies boosted their CEOs’ pay by 15%, while small-cap companies only paid their CEOs 5.5% more last year than they did in 2006 (the Corporate Library data were based on company proxy filings between August 2007 and June 2008).

A record number of CEOs also received substantial increases last year. In fact, 29 chief executives saw their total compensation increase by more than 1,000%.

It does not appear, however, that the executives awarded big pay hikes inflated the overall increases in pay. Mr. Hodgson pointed out that 25 CEOs saw their actual compensation decrease by 90% or more last year, with at least one CEO—Arbor Realty Trust’s Ivan Kaufman—receiving no compensation in 2007.


CEO pay at large-caps way up—despite drop in earnings - Financial Week
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-28-2008, 12:47 PM
 
Location: Windsor, Vero Beach, FL
897 posts, read 2,824,991 times
Reputation: 474
The problem is not with the salary of these CEO's - it's the "golden parachute" that is THE issue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2008, 01:39 PM
 
Location: Houston, TX
17,029 posts, read 30,925,220 times
Reputation: 16265
As I understand much of their compensation is stock options...but still there is no reason a CEO should be making more than 100x a regular workers salary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2008, 02:03 PM
 
Location: NW MT
1,436 posts, read 3,302,716 times
Reputation: 551
Not that I agree with the current compensation CEO's are receiving BUT lets not forget the fact that EVERYONE in this country has the right to negotiate what ever compensation packages they want for themselves. It is not Joe Blow CEO's fault that he receives 100x what another thinks he should get. It is the companies board of directors giving it to him !

If one doesn't agree with what a CEO of a company has negotiated for himself and what their board has agreed to give him, there is a simple solution... DON"T BUY THE STOCK ! Problem is all the STUPID people that will and do.

The last thing I want to see is any type of Gov regulation on the issue. Haven't we lost enough liberties in this country ????? Does anyone want the Gov telling you what you can and can't negotiate for yourself at your place of employment? Might as well go live in N Korea.....

The "market" needs to smarten up more than anything. It starts with the individual investor...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2008, 06:18 PM
 
27,214 posts, read 46,745,966 times
Reputation: 15667
I don't mind if a CEO makes a lot of money but IMO if the company is doing bad the salary should be less...similar to athletes and their contracts.

If a famous athletes signs a (example) $ 50 million contract that doesn't mean he will get that amount....there are some things that the athlete has to accomplish in order to do so (at least in tennis I know that for a fact). If the end as the # 1 on the rankings they get a bonus, if they win a major tournament the get a bonus...and in the end the can get to that amount, but many times the won't, still they will get a nice $ amount.

If an athlete doesn't win much they will get way less, and IMO that should be the same with the CEO's. We also have to remember that a CEO takes a risk that if the company isn't doing well he might not get another chance else where, so it could be his last job and family income....not that they will get to live on welfare, but still power comes with a risk and that is part of the salary.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2008, 07:55 PM
 
Location: NW MT
1,436 posts, read 3,302,716 times
Reputation: 551
Quote:
Originally Posted by bentlebee View Post
If an athlete doesn't win much they will get way less, and IMO that should be the same with the CEO's. We also have to remember that a CEO takes a risk that if the company isn't doing well he might not get another chance else where, so it could be his last job and family income....not that they will get to live on welfare, but still power comes with a risk and that is part of the salary.....
I'm glad you brought it up. The athletic world is another prime example and at the same time more easily rectified. The NFL for instance, if the owners would just create a "constitution" so to speak of how they want to structure pay they offer to players across the board for their business then you will no longer see the ridiculous contracts being handed out. (Al Davis is an exception...he suffers from mad cow or something. He's just plain nuts. Sorry Raiders fans ).

I do believe they are working on such a plan now as they are screwing themselves out of millions due to the hi priced contacts they are handing out to ROOKIES who have never stepped foot on an NFL field and making 20x what proven veterans are. Then they turn out to be a bust and that money is just gone from the system. There is no one to blame but the owners themselves and they know it.

Same situation with the markets. Until investors, the actual owners, put their feet down and say no more, boards will continue to be susceptible and taken advantage of by the CEO sales men. I don't blame them and at the same time I don't agree with it either. Investors have to speak up. Problem is they are too stupid to do anything about it.

As far as risk goes... life is risk for everyone. There is nothing special about a CEO's ?! And if any one of them fails at the "top", they are more than capable of working among us peeons of the world and making a living just as everyone else does.

But like I said, it is the boards and investors who allow this type of activity to go on. What ever comes of it, I just hope Gov doesn't end up stepping in and try to regulating it. That's just completely wrong...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2008, 10:58 PM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,856,573 times
Reputation: 18304
I have no problem with their salaries but the parachutes are a problem. Besides that is last year they are reporting on and many did very well..Some will deserve a bvonus for now their copmapnies performed durng this crisis.Afterall it seems that congress setup Fnnaie and Mac the same way and then refused to audit them.It also is good to remmber that most CEO bonuses are based on the year before .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2008, 05:21 AM
 
707 posts, read 1,293,389 times
Reputation: 438
Of course it's up, it's not easy to screw up this bad. Takes a lot of effort.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2008, 07:10 AM
 
Location: Windsor, Vero Beach, FL
897 posts, read 2,824,991 times
Reputation: 474
Quote:
Originally Posted by texdav View Post
I have no problem with their salaries but the parachutes are a problem. Besides that is last year they are reporting on and many did very well..Some will deserve a bvonus for now their copmapnies performed durng this crisis.Afterall it seems that congress setup Fnnaie and Mac the same way and then refused to audit them.It also is good to remmber that most CEO bonuses are based on the year before .
Exactly. Last year was profitable, except for the financial and housing sectors in the 4th qtr.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:47 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top