Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I thhnk you rae really mixed up on what65 the past conseravtive were. They were for small government and againnst foreign involvement. They certainly are not like today liberals who if you look at the current agenda will raise the national debt by triple what Bush left if they get half the programs they want. That will mean disaster for the fact that the money will be owed with interest to foreigners.That is who has bought treasuries notes. People talk about shipping jobs overseas ;this will ship the wealth of the country overseas. The only saving grace is that the foreigners are hurting and most likely wouldn't take on the treasuries but if they did the interest alone would mean much higher taxes for all or less spending on existing programs because the interest will consume so much of the budget.
I thhnk you rae really mixed up on what65 the past conseravtive were. They were for small government and againnst foreign involvement. They certainly are not like today liberals who if you look at the current agenda will raise the national debt by triple what Bush left if they get half the programs they want. That will mean disaster for the fact that the money will be owed with interest to foreigners.That is who has bought treasuries notes. People talk about shipping jobs overseas ;this will ship the wealth of the country overseas. The only saving grace is that the foreigners are hurting and most likely wouldn't take on the treasuries but if they did the interest alone would mean much higher taxes for all or less spending on existing programs because the interest will consume so much of the budget.
I am not confused at all. And I can spell. Go back and read what I wrote. As to the rest of it, if you want to be taken seriously, write seriously. Spell correctly. You lost me on sloppiness.
And Jesus Christ, just who do you think holds all our debt? Grrrr.....
That's what I'm talking about. Where's my bailout?!? I'm only looking for a billion or two, that's hardly a drop in the bucket! And I promise to spend 95% of it, all in America, to help stimulate the economy!
How about me, don't forget me - "It-sa my-a birthday-a too".
what america needs is jobs brought here, not shipped out. our businesses are investing overseas on the backs of american citizens. microsoft is investing 1 billion in china. (boycott microsoft) GM is planning on investing in SAIC in china for china's long-term benefit. we need a think tank of non-economists who have ideas for innovation and how to bring jobs here instead of make work projects, which is just a temporary government transfer of wealth from all taxpayers. that does not create wealth or long-term prospects, especially the infrastructure idea where projects will be handed out like candy to certain government favorites. investing in new forms of energy or improving current forms of energy could certainly be heading in a better direction.
Big corporations (greed goes without saying, but I will anyway). Homeowners who were greedy and/or stupid and/or refuse to take responsibility for taking on more than they should have. Greedy realtors and mortgage lenders. What is up with this country and its people? I am tired of all of them. Everyone is either stupid and/or greedy and/or blaming their woes on someone else. Whatever happened to personal responsibility??! And I am not even a conservative! But enough is enough!
Get with the program! I say we let Darwinism take its course.
I wish someone would bail me out. Ho, ho, ho!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.