Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-20-2010, 10:13 AM
 
Location: Texas
2,847 posts, read 2,517,717 times
Reputation: 1775

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by shaker281 View Post
A "jobless recovery" sounds better to me than no recovery at all. Let us hope that job creation occurs faster than predicted. Even though many would prefer that not to happen for political reasons.
I think you got it right, "no recovery at all".

It will be years until the unemployment mess and housing is rectified.

Corporate profits are great for wall street and their bundles of cash impressive, but mainstreet is not in a recovery.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-21-2010, 01:24 AM
 
4,765 posts, read 3,732,475 times
Reputation: 3038
Quote:
Originally Posted by aliveandwellinSA View Post
I think you got it right, "no recovery at all".

It will be years until the unemployment mess and housing is rectified.

Corporate profits are great for wall street and their bundles of cash impressive, but mainstreet is not in a recovery.
I do not recall anyone from any party claiming some quick road to recovery. The signs of economic recovery are many, but we are digging out of a huge mess and employment will likely be the last thing to improve, unfortunately.

If the same indicators were being professed by the political party you subscribe to, I suspect you would be touting them. Therefor this is both political and rhetorical, not based in economic facts.

BTW, do you own stocks, mutual funds or any equity based investments? If so, corporate profits are directly related to your situation. If not, then it might be a good time to buy.

To sum it up, the fact that it will take years for housing and employment to improve does not mean we are not seeing gradual improvement. I remain hopeful, but only time will tell.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2010, 08:12 AM
 
Location: Texas
2,847 posts, read 2,517,717 times
Reputation: 1775
[quote=shaker281;14271685]

If the same indicators were being professed by the political party you subscribe to

BTW, do you own stocks, mutual funds or any equity based investments? If so, corporate profits are directly related to your situation. If not, then it might be a good time to buy.



I do not subscribe to any political party, was your first error.

I own stock, mostly bonds and no mutual funds. Thank you very much, I am up 23.4% year to date.

Your summation is correct.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:00 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top