U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
 
Old 08-15-2009, 11:47 PM
 
975 posts, read 1,729,450 times
Reputation: 524

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimhcom View Post
What you fail to understand is that pendulums can only swing so far in one direction. There will at some time be reprisals for the injustices being perpetrated now. Those reprisals will not be good for the country as a whole. The greed of the rich has brought down several countries and governments over history, and it could easily happen again.
Wtf are you talking about? Reprisals? Injustices? Greed of the rich?

This isn't a biblicle event it's a freaking credit driven recession caused by an overleveraged economy. An economy where far too many little guys and big guys over extended themselves.

So everyone, the rich and the not rich, got greedy. There's nothing unjust or even uncommon about that. As far as reprisals thats just goofey talk. Calm down and take a breath.
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-16-2009, 04:25 AM
 
Location: Maine
3,471 posts, read 2,699,008 times
Reputation: 6670
Quote:
Originally Posted by Traderx View Post
Wtf are you talking about? Reprisals? Injustices? Greed of the rich?

This isn't a biblicle event it's a freaking credit driven recession caused by an overleveraged economy. An economy where far too many little guys and big guys over extended themselves.

So everyone, the rich and the not rich, got greedy. There's nothing unjust or even uncommon about that. As far as reprisals thats just goofey talk. Calm down and take a breath.
The difference is that the relative few "Rich" that overleveraged themselves got bailed out by the tax payers and the many more "not rich" lost there homes and jobs and small business's.
As for reprisals that will come in the form of stifling government regulations and interference into business and wall street that will hurt any chance for a recovery.
The reprisals will come from politicians looking to garner votes from angry taxpayers that are not going to care about why we had to bailout the "rich".



bill
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2009, 02:13 PM
 
Location: Conejo Valley, CA
12,469 posts, read 19,711,687 times
Reputation: 4355
Quote:
Originally Posted by roadrat View Post
The difference is that the relative few "Rich" that overleveraged themselves got bailed out by the tax payers and the many more "not rich" lost there homes and jobs and small business's.
When did the tax payers bailout the rich? I don't recall hearing about uncle Sam handing out checks to anybody that was rich. They have talked about raising their taxes though...to pay for the little guys things.


Quote:
Originally Posted by roadrat View Post
As for reprisals that will come in the form of stifling government regulations and interference into business and wall street that will hurt any chance for a recovery.
Perhaps you did not notice, but part of this crisis was caused by the removal of key banking regulations put in place after the Great Depression.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2009, 03:33 PM
 
12,867 posts, read 14,684,283 times
Reputation: 4454
Quote:
Originally Posted by user_id View Post
When did the tax payers bailout the rich? I don't recall hearing about uncle Sam handing out checks to anybody that was rich. They have talked about raising their taxes though...to pay for the little guys things.



Perhaps you did not notice, but part of this crisis was caused by the removal of key banking regulations put in place after the Great Depression.
i guess you missed the bank / wall street bailouts.....
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2009, 04:53 PM
 
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
2,221 posts, read 5,162,589 times
Reputation: 1702
Quote:
Originally Posted by user_id View Post
When did the tax payers bailout the rich? I don't recall hearing about uncle Sam handing out checks to anybody that was rich. They have talked about raising their taxes though...to pay for the little guys things.
How 'bout when they put Goldman Sacks-o-sh*t in a key advisory role on AIG, then put hundreds of billions of taxpayers dollars into AIG, which were subsequently passed through to wealthy counterparties, with the largest being...Goldman Sacks-o-sh*t.

How about when they injected tens of billions into Citibank preferred shares, and then allowed Citi to swap the preferred stock to common stock, giving up guaranteed dividends and any priority the taxpayer had in recovery? And when Citi then paid multimillion dollar bonuses to its executives...the ones that made the policies that allowed the country's largest bank to become insolvent in the first place?

Quote:
Originally Posted by user_id View Post
Perhaps you did not notice, but part of this crisis was caused by the removal of key banking regulations put in place after the Great Depression.
Yes, I did notice. I also notice that the Treasury Secretary in office and actively supporting the Gramm-Leach-Bliley act, which effectively shelved those Glass-Steagal Act protections, was none other than Larry Summers...currently head of Obama's economic team. And that another one of the principal proponents of GLB was Hank Paulson, then-CEO of Goldman Sacks-o-sh*t, just before he became Treasury Secretary.

What a God-awful corrupt disaster.


The existence of bankers
Demands the existence of guillotines
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2009, 04:47 AM
 
Location: Conejo Valley, CA
12,469 posts, read 19,711,687 times
Reputation: 4355
Quote:
Originally Posted by floridasandy View Post
i guess you missed the bank / wall street bailouts.....
No, I know all about TARP. No where did I see a provision to "bail out the rich". I'm not sure why people equate "the rich" with banks.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2009, 04:58 AM
 
Location: Conejo Valley, CA
12,469 posts, read 19,711,687 times
Reputation: 4355
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob from down south View Post
How 'bout when they put Goldman Sacks-o-sh*t in a key advisory role on AIG, then put hundreds of billions of taxpayers dollars into AIG, which were subsequently passed through to wealthy counterparties, with the largest being...Goldman Sacks-o-sh*t.
Do you have a time machine? I'm a bit curious how you know exactly how much the government is going to lose on these bailouts. These were loans and to what degree they will be paid back is completely unknown. The tax payers could actually gain...although that is unlikely.

Regardless, as with anything government related there are people that walk away with money, but treasury supported AIG to support the CDS markets not to transfer wealth to Goldman Sachs. Goldman Sachs was heavily involved in these markets so of course they would benefit, but the alternative is a total financial meltdown.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob from down south View Post
And when Citi then paid multimillion dollar bonuses to its executives...the ones that made the policies that allowed the country's largest bank to become insolvent in the first place?
This is just class warfare stuff. Firstly this money is small fish, secondly these bonuses are part of their contract and usually in direct relation to money they make for the bank. If the government was giving aid to a car dealership, would you cut the commissions on your top car salesmen?
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2009, 07:32 AM
 
12,867 posts, read 14,684,283 times
Reputation: 4454
this is not at all class warfare. it is about corruption and our government either being complicit in the corruption or doing nothing to stop it. americans know that the stock market is not trading on fundamentals now. honest traders and honest banks risk being pulled under with market manipulation.

we have a destabilizing world market and the chinese market hit a brick wall this morning, yet our media is full of happy economy stories.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2009, 07:41 AM
 
12,026 posts, read 11,204,855 times
Reputation: 11125
"Regardless, as with anything government related there are people that walk away with money, but treasury supported AIG to support the CDS markets not to transfer wealth to Goldman Sachs. Goldman Sachs was heavily involved in these markets so of course they would benefit, but the alternative is a total financial meltdown."

Most of the CDS' weren't held to protect holdings of corporate and mortgage-related debt securities. They were being used in the same manner as naked put option contracts. The US was under no obligation to reward companies for these unregulated products. They were certainly not obligated to pay off these contracts as if they were insuring debt, which in most cases they were not.

http://business.theatlantic.com/2009...ds_exposed.php

Last edited by lchoro; 08-17-2009 at 07:57 AM..
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2009, 03:30 PM
 
Location: Conejo Valley, CA
12,469 posts, read 19,711,687 times
Reputation: 4355
Quote:
Originally Posted by lchoro View Post
Most of the CDS' weren't held to protect holdings of corporate and mortgage-related debt securities. They were being used in the same manner as naked put option contracts. The US was under no obligation to reward companies for these unregulated products. They were certainly not obligated to pay off these contracts as if they were insuring debt, which in most cases they were not.
I never implied they were "obligated" to deal with it, but if they did not the entire financial system could have melted down. The collapse of Lehman brothers caused a number of problems, they were trying not to duplicate that experience.
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:
Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2023, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top