Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-06-2009, 01:37 PM
 
12,867 posts, read 14,912,825 times
Reputation: 4459

Advertisements

IMF World Economic Outlook (WEO) Update -- Contractionary Forces Receding But Weak Recovery Ahead, July 2009

Risks have moderated but remain to the downside.

The risks to the outlook are still tilted to the downside, although tail risks have diminished noticeably. In the advanced economies, rising unemployment and a loss of confidence in the stability of the financial sector (possibly resulting from a larger-than-anticipated wave of corporate bankruptcies) could put renewed downward pressure on asset prices and potentially trigger a deflationary episode. Moreover, rising questions about public debt sustainability in some countries could add to upward pressure on bond yields, with negative effects on the recovery of housing markets. Falling house prices are another important risk that could undermine confidence in bank capital bases. At the same time, a number of emerging economies remain quite vulnerable to intensified financial stress, with potential feedback effects on advanced economies. More generally, if higher unemployment and social discontent were to prompt governments to introduce trade and financial restrictions and roll back reforms to other sectors, there would be confidence and productivity would suffer. However, there are also some upside risks, including a larger-then-expected drop in risk aversion and stronger internal demand dynamics in some major emerging economies.

Rebalancing global demand
Looking beyond the next year, the crisis is likely, on the supply side, to have reduced the global economy’s sustainable output. Falling investment and widespread bankruptcies are lowering the level and perhaps also the rate of growth of potential output. Moreover, rising cyclical unemployment may translate into higher structural unemployment as workers lose market attachment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-06-2009, 02:14 PM
 
12,867 posts, read 14,912,825 times
Reputation: 4459
i think the IMF banking report is a clear indication that we are going to be asked to part with more of our money in the pretty near future.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2009, 02:18 PM
 
28,453 posts, read 85,370,617 times
Reputation: 18729
I thought Tom Cruise was their top agent...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2009, 05:24 AM
 
12,867 posts, read 14,912,825 times
Reputation: 4459
well lookie here:
Obama Adviser Suggests Second Stimulus - FOXBusiness.com (http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/obama-adviser-strongly-defends-stimulus-act/ - broken link)

that didn't take long.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2009, 06:38 AM
 
975 posts, read 1,754,878 times
Reputation: 524
It amazes me how quickly all these blow hards, the IMF being just one of them, have gotten so smart. They never saw any problems coming but now can see years if not decades in advance.

I'm not saying things are good, just that these guys, and all other economist, have no clue at all and their predictions rarely if ever come to pass. Just something to think about when reading their drivel.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2009, 06:46 AM
 
12,867 posts, read 14,912,825 times
Reputation: 4459
Quote:
Originally Posted by Traderx View Post
It amazes me how quickly all these blow hards, the IMF being just one of them, have gotten so smart. They never saw any problems coming but now can see years if not decades in advance.

I'm not saying things are good, just that these guys, and all other economist, have no clue at all and their predictions rarely if ever come to pass. Just something to think about when reading their drivel.
the problem for us is that their "drivel" influences policy. why do you think we are throwing taxpayer money at the IMF?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2009, 09:13 AM
 
28,453 posts, read 85,370,617 times
Reputation: 18729
Does anyone else find Dr. Roemer's incredibly fake "jolliness" to be a HUGE worry? I mean she is so obviously shaking in her shoes that the country will eventually figure out that their numbers are completely made up with her BS about "things would have been worse" I half expect her smiles to break into sobs at the every breath. "Oh god, things are not working they way we planned. There is no way we can pull off the health care take over. We don't have any sort of consensus on regulation. We have no idea how we agreed to bankroll the UAW's take over of GM. There is no way we can keep this chared spinning long enough not to look like fools for the 2010 elections...."
GULP!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2009, 03:44 PM
 
12,867 posts, read 14,912,825 times
Reputation: 4459
i like these two pieces of information back to back:

July 27 – Market News International (Denny Gulino): “The Federal Reserve agrees with Treasury’s ‘strong dollar’ policy and the way to get there is to have a strong economy, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke said in a PBS network special… The Sunday night videotaping showed a contained and unflustered Bernanke enthusiastically answering questions... ‘As far as the Fed and the dollar is concerned, the Fed supports the Treasury’s strong-dollar policy. We think the dollar should be strong. And the best way we think to get a strong dollar is to get a strong economy. When the economy’s strong then there’s a lot of good investment opportunities, foreigners want to invest here, and that causes the dollar to rise.’”

The dollar index declined 0.6% this week to a 2009 low 78.31.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:35 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top