Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Whose fault is debit card overdraft fees?
Evil Bank 13 26.53%
Irresponsible Consumer 36 73.47%
Voters: 49. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-10-2009, 01:33 PM
 
Location: Windsor, Vero Beach, FL
897 posts, read 2,825,191 times
Reputation: 474

Advertisements

More of the same. I cannot fathom the number of people who just seem to continue to make the same mistakes when it comes to managing their money.

DH and I have been banking with those "big monster mega banks" (some consumer guy radio guy calls them this ) for decades with absolutely NO issues. We always know how much money we have (or don't have) in our accounts at any given moment.

You can talk about ethics all you want to, but banks are out to make money. You may not like it, but it is legal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-10-2009, 06:28 PM
 
Location: Warwick, RI
5,481 posts, read 6,307,209 times
Reputation: 9534
Quote:
You can talk about ethics all you want to, but banks are out to make money. You may not like it, but it is legal.
That's right - they are what they are. You don't get mad at a dog for barking, that's just what dogs do.

Last edited by treasurekidd; 09-10-2009 at 06:46 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2009, 08:01 PM
 
Location: Marietta, GA
7,887 posts, read 17,195,472 times
Reputation: 3706
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeminiGal View Post
You can talk about ethics all you want to, but banks are out to make money. You may not like it, but it is legal.
Banks are in business to make money. I can understand when banks are sneaky and charge hidden fees and people get upset, but if you're careless with your money and end up paying fees because of it, then it's on you. Personally, I bank completely for free. I pay no fees or charges because I keep sufficient balances, use only my bank's ATMs, and pay my credit card balance monthly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2009, 08:33 PM
 
Location: Wherever I want to be... ;)
2,536 posts, read 9,931,794 times
Reputation: 1995
I've maybe over drafted twice in my life. Both times, I see it as MY FAULT, NOT THE BANK'S. The reason it happened what due to my stupidity in paying something out of an account that I was able to close (and thus had a low amount) and incorrectly choosing the wrong account on a credit card payment.

For me it was never a matter of "I don't have the money but I'm going to buy/pay for this anyhow and hope for the best (?)" but an issue with transferring funds/using the wrong account. I payed the $35 penalty or whatever, and hit myself over the head a few times.

I don't see how it could be the bank's fault, if the terms were explained to the customer beforehand...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2009, 03:41 PM
 
Location: El Paso, TX
3,493 posts, read 4,554,281 times
Reputation: 3026
Quote:
Originally Posted by neil0311 View Post
Small Debit Card Purchases Equal Big Money for Banks - General * US * News * Story - CNBC.com

There are two ways to avoid these fees:

- Add overdraft protection to your checking account. This protection usually comes with no annual fee and you only pay interest if you use and don't payoff within the month

- Keep a better eye on your balance and what you spend and only spend what you have in your account
Why is it evil on the bank's part? Did the individual fail to check his or her balance? Looks to me it was that way.

So why is the bank wrong in charging someone for not keeping his or her part of the deal because after all they did get a paper explaing these types of fees, correct?

To me this simply reflects what percieve a pervasive attitude it is not my fault if I do not read and keep my part of the bargain. The bank should pay for my mistake and/or laziness for not checking how is my account.

That really is the bottom line. However, instead of admitting personal fault we find so many people singing with them us how mean and greedy the banks are. I must note I am not saying banks do not take advantage of customers but even then the customre KNEW what the rules are though.

I have never had any problem with a bank since I was a teenager because I simply check what is my balance all the time and budget my money. It is a very simple concept.

You have a great day.
El Amigo
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2009, 04:12 PM
 
Location: mass
2,905 posts, read 7,350,665 times
Reputation: 5011
At one point in time, prior to the debit card, when it was checks that were "bouncing", I would definitely say it was the fault of the consumer, not the bank. Was the bank fully capitalizing on the mistakes of the consumer? YES. Was it the consumer's fault? YES.

However, in this day and age, I am more likely to say "evil bank" for several reasons.

Not everyone is granted overdraft protection because it is essentially a line of credit. Now, in the instance where someone is not granted an overdraft, the bank should not be clearing transactions where there is not enough money to cover them and then charging fees for this service. This happened to me years and years ago when the very first debit cards came out. I did argue the fee with the bank and they removed it, luckily.

I am now with a credit union. A few years ago, after some errors in my check register , I did have transactions that exceeded my available funds. The credit union covered them for me and charged me accordingly. I called them up to discuss it with them, and thanked them for covering my transactions but told them that I would have preferred it if they simply denied the transactions so that I would have immediately become aware of the situation, and that frankly I wouldn't have cared if my check to CVS had bounced and my name was mud with CVS, because I only write about 15 checks per year at this point since everything is online now. I was also irritated because I had plenty of money to cover my transactions in my savings account. So, they were very helpful in setting up my account so that if I ever had transactions that exceeded the funds in my checking account the money would be pulled from my savings account automatically. This was an excellent solution as far as I am concerned.

Quote:
Originally Posted by suzie02 View Post
Part of it is education. Most people assume that if they do not have enough money in the bank the would get declined.
It should get declined. You are using your DEBIT card, not CREDIT card. There is no reason that it shoudl not be declined. Oh, yes, there is one reason, so the banks can collect these hefty fees.

And the practice of clearing the largest transaction first so that people have multiple smaller transactions, each generating it's own overdraft fee should be outright illegal.

Transactions should be debited chronologically, not by size in order to generate the most revenue for the bank.

Quote:
Originally Posted by suzie02 View Post
Most people who use debit cards do so because they can not handle a credit card and the banks know this.
Comparing apples to oranges. People use their debit cards because they want to use their OWN money to pay for things, while not carrying cash, not because they can't handle a credit card!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChunkyMonkey View Post
Yes, both are at fault. But the banks clearing the largest expense first rather than chronologically makes me lean toward "evil" banks. I don't buy the "consumers want those important expenses to be cleared first" argument since overdraft protection still applies. This way, they get to have more fees.
I agree with this 100%
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2009, 07:52 AM
 
2,930 posts, read 7,063,350 times
Reputation: 1389
Quote:
Originally Posted by mommytotwo View Post
Comparing apples to oranges. People use their debit cards because they want to use their OWN money to pay for things, while not carrying cash, not because they can't handle a credit card!!
I agree with your post except with this part. I think everybody should use their credit cards and pay them at the end of the month. It will create less charges than using a debit in case of an error That false sense of financial freedom with debit cards is what banks are capitalizing on. Most wealthy people use credit cards not debit cards. People need to think with their heads not with their hearts, no one cares if you are using your own money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2009, 08:05 AM
 
Location: mass
2,905 posts, read 7,350,665 times
Reputation: 5011
Quote:
Originally Posted by lolita305 View Post
I agree with your post except with this part. I think everybody should use their credit cards and pay them at the end of the month. It will create less charges than using a debit in case of an error That false sense of financial freedom with debit cards is what banks are capitalizing on. Most wealthy people use credit cards not debit cards. People need to think with their heads not with their hearts, no one cares if you are using your own money.
That is true however if people are not keeping track of what's in their checking account, they are not going to keep track of what they spend on their credit card, and that can easily exceed what they will be able to pay at the end of the month.

Add to that the fact that with a debit card you can practically get a day to day balance of what you've got in there, and view it online in many cases, compared with getting a statement once a month from the credit card company.

I prefer debit over credit any day, but then again I don't really have a problem with overdraft, esp. since my account will go straight to savings. So I've got no issue with fees. The only exception is one credit card I have that gives cash back. Any large purchases I definitely use my CC so I can get the benefit of the cash back.

This reminds me of another point, because I was about to add that DH uses the CC most of the time, where I use the Debit. I can see where people would get into trouble with their Checking account if they have two people in the family running around with a Debit card. Now that is a recipe for disaster!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2009, 08:06 AM
 
Location: Texas
44,259 posts, read 64,375,553 times
Reputation: 73937
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzie02 View Post
We who belong to a finance forum know this but the average Joe doesn't.
Have you ever heard of people saying they can not balance a checkbook? I have. Some people are just ignorant and/or stupid. Banks know this and take advantage of that. I think the transactions should be declined if there is not enough money in the account.

People are ignorant and stupid so banks have an obligation to protect them? What the heck kind of looney logic is that?

It's the bank's fault I overdrafted.
It's Wall Street's fault I took out a bad loan.
It's the car's fault I ran out of gas.
It's General Mills fault I ran out of cereal.

Really? This is moronic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2009, 08:56 AM
 
Location: Marietta, GA
7,887 posts, read 17,195,472 times
Reputation: 3706
Quote:
Originally Posted by stan4 View Post
People are ignorant and stupid so banks have an obligation to protect them? What the heck kind of looney logic is that?

It's the bank's fault I overdrafted.
It's Wall Street's fault I took out a bad loan.
It's the car's fault I ran out of gas.
It's General Mills fault I ran out of cereal.

Really? This is moronic.
You're right, but that's the victimhood society we live in today. No longer are you responsible for the choices you make, but rather it's the "fault" of some nebulous entity that things "happen to" you.

Look at the foreclosure problems. Sure, there are some responsible folks who lost jobs and through minimal fault of their own lost their homes. However, many people took mortgages they couldn't afford, under false pretenses or without proper qualification, and it took very little for them to be in a position that anyone should have seen coming, with or without a recession. The recession just hastened things. Many blame the banks and "predatory lending" but it's really irresponsibility on the part of the borrower.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:16 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top