Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-22-2009, 02:15 PM
 
4,010 posts, read 10,208,979 times
Reputation: 1600

Advertisements

So if you and your employer came to an arrangement where you got paid in gold coin instead of Federal Reserve Notes what is your tax burden?

For example you do the equivalent of a $1000 work/week. At the end of the week your employer hands you a US $20 gold coin from the US Mint. (Shown below) This coin is $20 legal tender but the materials that make it up include 1 oz of 24 carat gold which is currently worth ~$1150 in federal reserve notes. Ignore the numismatic coin.

Is your tax burden $20 or is it $1150?


Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-22-2009, 02:30 PM
 
975 posts, read 1,754,550 times
Reputation: 524
This is easy. $20 because thats ALL it's worth. Melting the coin is illegal afterall.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2009, 02:49 PM
 
Location: Planet Eaarth
8,954 posts, read 20,674,468 times
Reputation: 7193
Quote:
Originally Posted by lumbollo View Post
So if you and your employer came to an arrangement where you got paid in gold coin instead of Federal Reserve Notes what is your tax burden?

For example you do the equivalent of a $1000 work/week. At the end of the week your employer hands you a US $20 gold coin from the US Mint. (Shown below) This coin is $20 legal tender but the materials that make it up include 1 oz of 24 carat gold which is currently worth ~$1150 in federal reserve notes. Ignore the numismatic coin.

Is your tax burden $20 or is it $1150?

Your tax burden is the value of gold in the coin not the face value. There is also the difficulty of using gold as "coin of the realm" for buying anything. Gold is not "legal tender" under U.S. law. Sure people will take it but what's the sense of paying a debt with a gold coin and only getting face value for it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2009, 02:57 PM
 
5,760 posts, read 11,542,202 times
Reputation: 4949
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tightwad View Post
Your tax burden is the value of gold in the coin not the face value. There is also the difficulty of using gold as "coin of the realm" for buying anything. Gold is not "legal tender" under U.S. law. Sure people will take it but what's the sense of paying a debt with a gold coin and only getting face value for it?
Traderx is correct.

The "sense" is the method allows the transfer of value without creating a tax liability.

IRS lost a big case (total loss on something like 161 claims) on this already.

It has (obviously) gotten little Corporate News coverage.

sample story:

- Corporate Media Ignores Major IRS Defeat
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2009, 03:00 PM
 
1,955 posts, read 5,266,089 times
Reputation: 1124
My best guess would be that the tax liability would be zero until the person with the gold sold the coin in order to have currency to pay for stuff. He would then be taxed according to whatever currency he brought in from each sale. If he were able to somehow miraculously cover all his expenses with the gold or was otherwise independently wealthy, he could probably get under the radar as far as taxes go.

My feeling is that the IRS, if it were to do an audit of the person's finances and assets, would try to treat this as a barter arrangement. If the pay were 1 oz of gold per week, the likelihood of an audit would be pretty minimal. 5 oz or more week might invite more suspicion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2009, 03:59 PM
 
4,010 posts, read 10,208,979 times
Reputation: 1600
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tightwad View Post
... Gold is not "legal tender" under U.S. law.
My question was not about gold. My question was about gold coins issued by the US Mint. On this point you are incorrect. Gold coins from the US Mint are 100% legal tender. Ronald Reagan signed the bill into law that made them as such in 1986. Gold of course isn't. Neither is paper, silver, copper, etc. But the minute it is formed into currency it is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2009, 04:02 PM
 
4,010 posts, read 10,208,979 times
Reputation: 1600
It's not exactly a clear answer. The argument can be made that your income is always the face value of the currency, not the material it is made of. It's an interesting paradox given the history of our money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2009, 06:38 PM
 
Location: Planet Eaarth
8,954 posts, read 20,674,468 times
Reputation: 7193
Quote:
Originally Posted by lumbollo View Post
My question was not about gold. My question was about gold coins issued by the US Mint. On this point you are incorrect. Gold coins from the US Mint are 100% legal tender. Ronald Reagan signed the bill into law that made them as such in 1986. Gold of course isn't. Neither is paper, silver, copper, etc. But the minute it is formed into currency it is.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lumbollo View Post
It's not exactly a clear answer. The argument can be made that your income is always the face value of the currency, not the material it is made of. It's an interesting paradox given the history of our money.
Again with you
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2009, 07:06 PM
 
28,455 posts, read 85,339,930 times
Reputation: 18728
Really ought to check more than one source: Jury convicts business owner Robert Kahre of tax fraud - Friday, Aug. 14, 2009 | 5:54 p.m. - Las Vegas Sun

Who you gonna trust?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2009, 07:13 PM
 
975 posts, read 1,754,550 times
Reputation: 524
Quote:
Originally Posted by chet everett View Post
That Las vegas case sounds completely different to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top