Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Education
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-20-2011, 02:16 PM
 
355 posts, read 209,456 times
Reputation: 126

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by stan4 View Post
I propose we make obtaining teaching credentialing more difficult by actually making it HARD to graduate your training as a teacher.
I have over a decade of experience teaching people math, but I am not "qualified" to teach math to struggling high school students.

I have an advance degree in economics with years at the Ph.d. level (which is all abstract math) with a 3.5 gpa. I minored in Math as a undergrad. I scored a 790/800 in the qualitative section of the GRE, but the state considers me unsuited to teach people math.

Why do you want to make it more difficult for qualified people to teach?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-20-2011, 02:18 PM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,724,200 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJBest View Post
My post was intended to show show well educated students are across the different states.
Ok. In that case I'd agree with you, kids in those states are going to be more educated on average.

Quote:
I don't know anything about (public) educational policy. Can you kindly explain what you mean and how the states differ?
Some people like to take the data you posted -- which are the results of the students' achievement -- and then interpret it to mean that these high achieving states have school systems which are better than the school systems at the bottom of the list. Those folks would argue that it was the union that made the difference in scores, or the pay, or any number of policy decisions.

That is what I would strongly disagree with. The biggest determinant of student's scores are the quality of their family. Teachers aren't miracle workers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2011, 02:21 PM
 
24,488 posts, read 41,129,284 times
Reputation: 12920
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
Ok. In that case I'd agree with you, statistically kids in those states are going to be more educated.



Some people would take the data you posted, and then interpret it to mean that New Jersey's school systems are better than the school systems at the bottom of the list. That is what I would strongly disagree with.
Can you explain why the data in that chart is not a good representation of which is a better school system? I want to define "better school system" as the school system one would put their child in over the other(s) with the expectation of the child having received a better education (given that is the primary purpose of a school system).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2011, 02:26 PM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,724,200 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJBest View Post
I want to define "better school system" as the school system one would put their child in over the other(s) with the expectation of the child having received a better education (given that is the primary purpose of a school system).
well it depends on what we're talking about. if you define "school system" to include the kids themselves, and the knowledge that they accumulate from their parents, measured by their total achievement, then this is one way to look at it. That is probably how I'd look at it if I was a parent, looking to send my kid to one of several schools in an area.

If you define "school system" to include the set of policies, the rules, the regulations, the methods involved, the tools used, the amount of money spent, and so on, without taking into account the sort of students that attend.... that is another way to look at it. That's how I'd define it, if I was looking at state-level data, and trying to figure out which state had the best system of educating its students.

Last edited by le roi; 06-20-2011 at 02:36 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2011, 02:52 PM
 
24,488 posts, read 41,129,284 times
Reputation: 12920
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
well it depends on what we're talking about. if you define "school system" to include the kids themselves, and the knowledge that they accumulate from their parents, measured by their total achievement, then this is one way to look at it. That is probably how I'd look at it if I was a parent, looking to send my kid to one of several schools in an area.

If you define "school system" to include the set of policies, the rules, the regulations, the methods involved, the tools used, the amount of money spent, and so on, without taking into account the sort of students that attend.... that is another way to look at it. That's how I'd define it, if I was looking at state-level data, and trying to figure out which state had the best system of educating its students.
Thanks for the explanation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2011, 02:59 PM
 
Location: Boston, MA
14,480 posts, read 11,276,052 times
Reputation: 8996
Or we could just fire the bad teachers we have. Oh wait, I forgot the unions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2011, 03:14 PM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,338 posts, read 60,522,810 times
Reputation: 60924
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Joshua View Post
Or we could just fire the bad teachers we have. Oh wait, I forgot the unions.


And teachers get fired every year in nearly every school system across the US.

Those horror stories you read about are usually caused by lazy administrators not doing their jobs. Teachers as a rule have no more and no less protection from wrongful termination than any other worker in any field. Even most non-union employers have work rules covering termination.

Again, where people get the idea that the teacher's associations are so powerful is a source of bemusement to me. Most, if not all, are pretty worthless. In nearly 30 years I've had occasion to call on the association twice-once for a grievance that took 4 years to settle (in my favor) and by that time the situation had worked itself out and another time for an incident where the Principal was allowing a parent to conduct an investigation of my restraint of her son (who had punched me in the face after I broke up a fight he had instigated). In neither case was the local association any help at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2011, 03:20 PM
 
760 posts, read 685,451 times
Reputation: 457
Quote:
Originally Posted by stan4 View Post
I propose we make obtaining teaching credentialing more difficult by actually making it HARD to graduate your training as a teacher.

Discuss.
My degree for teaching high school biology is basically pre-med with pedagogy/internship classes attached. It's hard enough

Most people "have a friend" or "always heard getting a teaching a degree was easy". This is not always the case and this broad generalization is not necessary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2011, 03:28 PM
 
1,759 posts, read 2,028,994 times
Reputation: 950
Quote:
Originally Posted by Air Force View Post
My degree for teaching high school biology is basically pre-med with pedagogy/internship classes attached. It's hard enough

Most people "have a friend" or "always heard getting a teaching a degree was easy". This is not always the case and this broad generalization is not necessary.
That's why it's advantageous to have people like us in the discussion,
who actually know what it is of which we speak.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2011, 11:50 AM
 
6,565 posts, read 14,292,505 times
Reputation: 3229
Quote:
Originally Posted by ergohead View Post
You think any K-12 teacher could diagram a sentence?

No!
If you spent a few minutes re-teaching it to them? I'd bet most could.

Hey I couldn't diagram a sentence right now. Is that because I'm stupid?

No, its because I learned how to do it 25-30 years ago and NEVER had to do it again once I left High School.

I know your specific point is to somehow highlight how dumb most teachers are, but you'll need a better example as proof...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Education

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top