
12-08-2013, 03:44 PM
|
|
|
4,043 posts, read 7,120,980 times
Reputation: 3890
|
|
Assuming the child tends to perform in the approx. 5-10 percentile of the general population on a variety of standardized tests (ability and achievement) ..which option would you support if a parent were to ask your advice?
By "big fish in an average pond" I mean a child who tends to stand out in his school as one of the best, and the school itself is good to very good, but not necessarily "the best". The alternative would be the "average fish in a top-pond" where the child would probably be pretty average in the school context, because many other children excel there, usually because they come from highly educated, professional, overachiever type families.
This is what some people call "pressure cookers" while others see them as environments where "peer pressure" would encourage a solid education.
Which scenario would you favor for your child and why ? I refer to public k-12 education.
Thank you so much.
|

12-08-2013, 04:13 PM
|
|
|
Location: southwestern PA
20,416 posts, read 43,956,023 times
Reputation: 40044
|
|
Whichever is the best fit for the individual kid, in regards to academics, cost, feel of the campus, etc.
|

12-08-2013, 06:28 PM
|
|
|
2,031 posts, read 2,269,849 times
Reputation: 9243
|
|
Really depends on the personality of the kid. Some do better when they have better influences around them. Others with shakier self-esteem may feel they aren't particularly smart by comparison. You have to do what works best for your child's particular personality.
|

12-08-2013, 07:37 PM
|
|
|
1,420 posts, read 3,032,904 times
Reputation: 2254
|
|
My choice would be average fish in a top pond: Advantages of peers, connections, culture of high performance, typically nicer neighborhoods.
|

12-08-2013, 08:19 PM
|
|
|
11,642 posts, read 22,923,927 times
Reputation: 12260
|
|
I would prefer that my kids be surrounded by high achieving peers even if it meant that they were not at the top of the heap. I think that kids do better in an environment where success is a normal part of life. The downside of that can be a pressure cooker type environment.
|

12-08-2013, 08:25 PM
|
|
|
1,420 posts, read 3,032,904 times
Reputation: 2254
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Momma_bear
The downside of that can be a pressure cooker type environment.
|
The upside of that can be a pressure cooker type environment - just like a rigorous college academic program will be.
|

12-08-2013, 08:31 PM
|
|
|
8,402 posts, read 23,173,654 times
Reputation: 6810
|
|
Not that it matters to the thread, but the phrase is "big fish in a little pond".
|

12-08-2013, 08:54 PM
|
|
|
11,642 posts, read 22,923,927 times
Reputation: 12260
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheektowaga_Chester
The upside of that can be a pressure cooker type environment - just like a rigorous college academic program will be.
|
I think it's like many things. The best thing about something can also be the worst.
|

12-08-2013, 09:16 PM
|
|
|
Location: The analog world
17,082 posts, read 12,454,878 times
Reputation: 22867
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheektowaga_Chester
My choice would be average fish in a top pond: Advantages of peers, connections, culture of high performance, typically nicer neighborhoods.
|
Ditto.
|

12-08-2013, 09:25 PM
|
|
|
4,043 posts, read 7,120,980 times
Reputation: 3890
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by vmaxnc
Not that it matters to the thread, but the phrase is "big fish in a little pond".
|
I know that, but I "adapted" it. 
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|