Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Education
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-05-2015, 11:27 AM
 
3,313 posts, read 2,131,554 times
Reputation: 5136

Advertisements

For me, the three greatest contributors to lesser achievement appear to be:
  • Lackluster/absent parents.
  • Living in very poor and/or high crime areas.
  • Bullying, and the failure of the schools to deal with such properly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-06-2015, 04:04 AM
 
Location: Whoville....
25,386 posts, read 35,518,637 times
Reputation: 14692
Quote:
Originally Posted by OpinionInOcala View Post
For me, the three greatest contributors to lesser achievement appear to be:
  • Lackluster/absent parents.
  • Living in very poor and/or high crime areas.
  • Bullying, and the failure of the schools to deal with such properly.
I'd have to disagree. We've always had lackluster/absent parents, we've always had poor/or high crime areas and we've always had bullying. While I do think these contribute to lesser success I don't think they are the cause of lower scores when comparing yesteryear to today because they've always been there.

Comparing the idyllic past to today , what has really changed is we keep everyone in school (on a college bound track no less) whether they want to be there or not,and whether they put in any effort or not. Way back when, if you didn't do the work, you got expelled. If you didn't want to be in school or needed to work, you dropped out and those who stayed in were tracked so that they got an education that was tailored to them.

IMO the biggest difference between then and now is student accountability. Students were held accountable back then. Today we blame everyone except the student for a student's failure. I blame the self esteem movement and technology for low scores today. Kids feel great about themselves but as I said before, they think Googling is thinking. They are not held accountable for actually doing the work and they don't think. They want to be entertained because they grew up with a piece of technology entertaining them and have the attention span of a gnat. Teaching today is more about entertaining students into accidentally learning something than it is teaching. The more we cater to their lack of attention span, desire to be entertained and inability to think, the worse it gets.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2015, 03:01 PM
 
1,418 posts, read 2,545,603 times
Reputation: 806
Pot smoke? How about focusing on lousy Math teachers who are protected by tenure?!?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Education

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:18 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top