Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Education
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-21-2015, 04:46 PM
 
Location: SoCal
20,160 posts, read 12,752,657 times
Reputation: 16993

Advertisements

No, it's not on the way out. It's such a beautiful language. I'm listening to the real Parisian accent because of the Paris bombing and I want more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-24-2015, 12:34 PM
 
Location: Limbo
6,512 posts, read 7,545,788 times
Reputation: 6319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mouldy Old Schmo View Post
I took French in high school and did poorly. At one time, rich American girls learned French in private schools. Why was that? Do many high schools offer French nowadays?
I hope not, because my school only offered French and Spanish. They offered German, but that was dropped.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2015, 08:27 PM
 
Location: Berkeley, CA
662 posts, read 1,281,285 times
Reputation: 938
Kids who take classes for 2 or 3 years still aren’t even a fraction as proficient as someone who spend a year in France. You can see the difference. School taught kids are still thinking through every single word to form a sentence. For kids who’ve spend even a summer overseas, it comes second nature.

They should encourage exchange programs. You have to be in an environment where you’re forced to speak it and practice it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2015, 10:21 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
1,261 posts, read 950,007 times
Reputation: 1468
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtran103 View Post
Kids who take classes for 2 or 3 years still aren’t even a fraction as proficient as someone who spend a year in France. You can see the difference. School taught kids are still thinking through every single word to form a sentence. For kids who’ve spend even a summer overseas, it comes second nature.

They should encourage exchange programs. You have to be in an environment where you’re forced to speak it and practice it.
True, but in-school programs are a good compliment to exchange programs. Study abroad isn't possible for all students, but studying another language should be.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2015, 02:18 PM
 
Location: The analog world
17,077 posts, read 13,359,835 times
Reputation: 22904
Spoken languages offered at my children's public high school: Latin, French, German, Spanish, & Mandarin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2015, 05:14 AM
 
Location: Asia
2,768 posts, read 1,581,960 times
Reputation: 3049
I studied French for 4 years or so, from the 9th grade to a year in college. Never attained any significant degree of speaking proficiency, but, as it is somewhat similar to English, I can read a good deal of French.

I went to Asia in 1985 and have been speaking Mandarin Chinese since then, and despite starting this language at the age of 22, I am fairly good at it, now. Language is all about environment. Its relatively easy to pick up Mandarin over here. Doesn't hurt me, either, that my wife is Chinese.

We made certain that our son started Chinese kindergarten and went to Chinese schools through the 9th grade. Only then did we move him to an American school and then finally to the US for high school and university. He's native proficiency fluent in both Mandarin and English, and is now in grad school in the US and studying a second Asian language.

For myself and my son, speaking Mandarin and now his second language, in addition to English, make sense. Some posters above have opined that Americans do not need to know any language but English. They are largely correct. Even expats living in Asia debate often the merits and value of spending the time needed to learn Chinese/Japanese/Korean as opposed to investing the same time in obtaining a professional degree/skill.

At my office in Asia, we use English almost exclusively and use Chinese only with Chinese clients, and even then not always. English is used with clients from all other places, including Hong Kong. I do speak Mandarin in the office with the secretaries and staff, however, and speaking Chinese certainly makes living here easier and more interesting.

But, there are other reasons to learn a second (or third) language. Being bi- or trilingual opens the brain to different ways of perception and thinking and problem solving.

Second languages learning opportunities should be offered early and made to be fun and natural, rather than boring and with the added pressure of exams and grades. Its true that not everyone will need to be proficient in a second language as adults, but, why not give people the opportunity to learn naturally and easy and then let them decide for themselves whether they wish to continue with a language as they get older.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2015, 04:46 PM
 
Location: PHX -> ATL
6,311 posts, read 6,808,542 times
Reputation: 7167
They got rid of French in my high school the year after I graduated. Instead of having 3 Spanish teachers and 1 French teacher, my HS has 4 Spanish teachers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2015, 06:49 AM
 
602 posts, read 504,467 times
Reputation: 763
Quote:
Originally Posted by :-D View Post
They got rid of French in my high school the year after I graduated. Instead of having 3 Spanish teachers and 1 French teacher, my HS has 4 Spanish teachers.
Why did they get rid of French if they'd have to hire another Spanish teacher anyway? I'd understand if the French teacher's load was well below that of most of the other full-time teachers, but if there is enough interest in the language to make having a French teacher economically viable why take away the choice?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2015, 10:06 AM
 
Location: Chicago
6,160 posts, read 5,706,855 times
Reputation: 6193
Quote:
Originally Posted by KellyXY View Post
Why did they get rid of French if they'd have to hire another Spanish teacher anyway? I'd understand if the French teacher's load was well below that of most of the other full-time teachers, but if there is enough interest in the language to make having a French teacher economically viable why take away the choice?
Usually it has to do with numbers. I have pretty decent numbers in my classes, but if they ever dropped too low, I'm sure the school would drop the French program. The Spanish classes are always overfilled. We probably need another Spanish teacher, but the funding isn't there. I wonder if I resign if they will keep the French and German programs. Actually, I'm surprised they still keep German. I only teach 1 and 2, and only one level per semester.

Reasons for the decline in French has to do with peer pressure and society. Most students think they will use Spanish more (like two semesters of high school Spanish is really going to help you in life). Also, there is a misconception that Spanish is easier than French. Lastly, French is seen more as a feminine and "sissy" language.

I've noticed that French students take French because they want to. People take Spanish because they have to. The Spanish teachers have 10x more behavior problems than I have.

However, it takes a very special student to study German. They are usually the nerdier or sort of "outcast" kids. I've also had a few anti-semitic or racist students. They never said anything inappropriate, but you could just tell.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2015, 12:07 AM
 
25,556 posts, read 23,965,375 times
Reputation: 10120
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tritone View Post
What percentage of students successfully learn a language in school anyway? I'm gonna guess less than 1%.

What language Americans study in highschool or college makes no difference because the outcome is the same: purely mono-lingual graduates irrespective of what language they study.
Not necessarily.

I studied Spanish in high school, was an exchange student to Paraguay, took Spanish at the university level, and also have lived around many Hispanics.

You don't learn a language solely in CLASS. Nobody does. You need to do things like speak to people who speak that language, watch tv or listen to music in that language, read books in that language, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Education

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top