Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-30-2011, 01:58 AM
 
3,335 posts, read 2,672,767 times
Reputation: 565

Advertisements

Rick Perry's Double Talk on Social Security and the Constitution - Robert Schlesinger (usnews.com)

Robert Schlesinger

Rick Perry's Double Talk on Social Security and the Constitution

By Robert Schlesinger
Posted: August 29, 2011


This we know: Texas Gov. Rick Perry, the apparent GOP 2012 front-runner, doesn’t like Social Security.
[Check out political cartoons about the 2012 GOP field.]
He has, for example, described it in his recent book as not only a “Ponzi scheme,” but “by far the best example” of a program “violently tossing aside any respect for our founding principles,” and as having been put in place “at the expense of respect for the Constitution and limited government.” Elsewhere he has said that the Constitution’s “general welfare” clause does not cover Social Security and Medicare. In other words not only is Social Security bad policy, Perry believes, but actually in defiance of our founding principles in general and the Constitution in particular.
While he and his campaign had appeared to dance away from these characterizations, Perry was at it again in Iowa over the weekend, calling the program a “monstrous lie,” and saying that he stood by everything in his book (including, presumably, Social Security’s unconstitutionality).
So here’s what I want to know: What would President Rick Perry do about Social Security?
[Read: Can Perry, Bachmann, or Romney Save the Toxic GOP Brand?]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-30-2011, 12:02 PM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 17,004,475 times
Reputation: 5932
Quote:
Originally Posted by quality guy View Post
Rick Perry's Double Talk on Social Security and the Constitution - Robert Schlesinger (usnews.com)

Robert Schlesinger

Rick Perry's Double Talk on Social Security and the Constitution

By Robert Schlesinger
Posted: August 29, 2011


This we know: Texas Gov. Rick Perry, the apparent GOP 2012 front-runner, doesn’t like Social Security.
[Check out political cartoons about the 2012 GOP field.]
He has, for example, described it in his recent book as not only a “Ponzi scheme,” but “by far the best example” of a program “violently tossing aside any respect for our founding principles,” and as having been put in place “at the expense of respect for the Constitution and limited government.” Elsewhere he has said that the Constitution’s “general welfare” clause does not cover Social Security and Medicare. In other words not only is Social Security bad policy, Perry believes, but actually in defiance of our founding principles in general and the Constitution in particular.
While he and his campaign had appeared to dance away from these characterizations, Perry was at it again in Iowa over the weekend, calling the program a “monstrous lie,” and saying that he stood by everything in his book (including, presumably, Social Security’s unconstitutionality).
So here’s what I want to know: What would President Rick Perry do about Social Security?
[Read: Can Perry, Bachmann, or Romney Save the Toxic GOP Brand?]
Worse, No, he is better at it and even more owned by the Rich and Big Business. Good thing there is a long track record documenting his actions and ideas and as we can see he just cannot help himself from opening his mouth and proving he is not the answer to anything this country needs. The Demos will tear him a new one if/when he gets the GOP nomination and the whinning from the right will go on and on and on, it is what they are best at.
Casper
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2011, 12:03 PM
 
20,503 posts, read 12,452,904 times
Reputation: 10329
when did liberals stop beating their wives?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2011, 12:17 PM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 17,004,475 times
Reputation: 5932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
when did liberals stop beating their wives?
At the same time that Conservatives did
Casper
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2011, 12:19 PM
 
Location: South Carolina
8,145 posts, read 6,554,118 times
Reputation: 1754
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
when did liberals stop beating their wives?
Another good laugh for the day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2011, 12:21 PM
 
Location: Atlanta
6,807 posts, read 5,701,090 times
Reputation: 5669
Glad to see they have both STOPPED>
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2011, 12:21 PM
 
Location: South Carolina
8,145 posts, read 6,554,118 times
Reputation: 1754
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casper in Dallas View Post
Worse, No, he is better at it and even more owned by the Rich and Big Business. Good thing there is a long track record documenting his actions and ideas and as we can see he just cannot help himself from opening his mouth and proving he is not the answer to anything this country needs. The Demos will tear him a new one if/when he gets the GOP nomination and the whinning from the right will go on and on and on, it is what they are best at.
Casper
He will be the nominee. Republicans in the south love his sleezy type. The good news is we wont have to hear about him anymore after election night.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2011, 12:24 PM
 
3,335 posts, read 2,672,767 times
Reputation: 565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
when did liberals stop beating their wives?
Aren't MOST liberals wives of the same sex?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2011, 12:43 PM
 
20,503 posts, read 12,452,904 times
Reputation: 10329
I see the liberals here dont get it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2011, 12:51 PM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 17,004,475 times
Reputation: 5932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
I see the liberals here dont get it.
Don't want it either, keep it to yourself.
Casper
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:43 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top