Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-04-2011, 11:22 AM
 
4,911 posts, read 3,434,305 times
Reputation: 1257

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleet View Post
The state of Florida was not "stolen," get over it!

How could Bush "steal" something he had already won?
He didn't "win" it until the Supreme Court decreed it
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-04-2011, 11:25 AM
 
4,911 posts, read 3,434,305 times
Reputation: 1257
Quote:
Originally Posted by djacques View Post
Bush was duly elected president in the Electoral College and therefore he was legally the president. A case can be made that his side behaved unethically. A case can be made that the 2000 Election wasn't the best possible display of the democratic process in action. A case can be made for abolishing the Electoral College. Nevertheless, Bush was legally the president.
Sorry but that "he won the electoral vote so case closed" argument went out the window with the cons "but Clinton lost the popular vote" argument of the 90's
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2011, 11:31 AM
 
4,911 posts, read 3,434,305 times
Reputation: 1257
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
More deflection.

There were 3 recounts, paid for by the media, after Bush was declared the winner.

All three had Bush on top.
Key word there being "after"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2011, 11:36 AM
 
Location: San Antonio Texas
11,431 posts, read 19,015,700 times
Reputation: 5224
Quote:
Originally Posted by knowledgeiskey View Post
Leftists always affirm that Bush didn not really win the election. Are they right?
Technically yes, but the election was stolen from him due to a combination of thievery from the Florida Secty of State, gov Jeb Bush (eliminating many blacks from the rolls), an incompetent Palm Bch Cty Elections Registrar (LePore) that designed the "butterfly ballot" and non-counting of the thousands of "overvotes" that were placed in the Panhandle.
Bush stole that election. But gore should have demanded a manual recount of all 67 counties, not just cherry-pick the "blue" ones. That made him look like an opportunist. the crooked SCOTUS should have stayed out of it. But that's the way that Republicans are. they are used to playing in the gutter and stop at NOTHING to win.

Last edited by wehotex; 09-04-2011 at 11:46 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2011, 11:40 AM
 
Location: San Antonio Texas
11,431 posts, read 19,015,700 times
Reputation: 5224
Quote:
Originally Posted by az461 View Post
does anybody know by how many votes george w. Bush won by.

I remember a very long time back in 2004. When they were pushing the young people to vote, they said "bush won by just 500 votes' i was stunned, but i am sure that information was not credible. I remember a commercial about that.

537.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2011, 11:42 AM
 
Location: Upper East Side of Texas
12,498 posts, read 27,015,869 times
Reputation: 4890
Quote:
Originally Posted by 90sman View Post
The 2000 elections were eleven years ago, it's time to move on.
Liberals can't seem to do that though. They're still blaming Bush when he hasn't been in office for 3 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2011, 11:45 AM
 
Location: Vermont
11,762 posts, read 14,670,726 times
Reputation: 18539
Quote:
Originally Posted by az461 View Post
Does anybody know by how many votes George W. Bush won by.
5-4. It doesn't get closer than that, even though it takes five corrupt Supreme Court justices to do it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2011, 11:45 AM
 
Location: San Antonio Texas
11,431 posts, read 19,015,700 times
Reputation: 5224
Quote:
Originally Posted by whogo View Post
From wiki:

If anyone ever still believed the USSC was even one iota interested in the integrity of the law and not partisanship it was this decision right here that would tell them otherwise. The five judges who would normally tend to be against the federal government intervening in the business of the state chose to have the federal government intervene. The four judges who normally had a tendency to favor federal power chose to remand the case back to the state courts. The liberals on the court were right; the case should have been remanded. This is the most odious partisan decision in the history of the USSC.

Having said all that Bush would have almost certainly won anyways if the oligarchs in black robes had remanded the case back to the Florida courts.

Scalia & uncle Thomas also should have recused themselves for their blatant conflict of interests in their families, who all held influential positions in the Bush campaign and would benefit from a Bush victory.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2011, 11:46 AM
 
Location: Vermont
11,762 posts, read 14,670,726 times
Reputation: 18539
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkatt View Post
Did Gore actually create the Internet?

No and No.

Thank you for playing.
And he never claimed that he did, regardless of the press that favored Bush in the election who constantly repeated that claim.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2011, 11:46 AM
 
Location: Texas State Fair
8,560 posts, read 11,223,871 times
Reputation: 4258
Quote:
Originally Posted by az461;20730641[B
]Does anybody know by how many votes George W. Bush won by.[/b]

I remember a very long time back in 2004. When they were pushing the young people to vote, they said "Bush won by just 500 votes' I was stunned, but I am sure that information was not credible. I remember a commercial about that.
At least one but less than one thousand. The number is generally not agreed upon but recounts have produced a Bush win. You'd serve yourself well to look up the info, to understand how and why the results don't satisfy all who inquire.

Those results - or that 500 you reference - are Florida votes, the Florida electorals resulting in the Bush election. Nationally, the popular vote numbers vary. But it's not the popular vote that elects a President, it is the electoral vote. Thus the Florida debate.

These things should be taught in public education. If you're not learning this in high school then you should be questioning your teachers.

Last edited by Willsson; 09-04-2011 at 11:56 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top