Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
FDR served 4 terms because elections were not held between 1941-1944... during WW II...
how complete of an idiot are you? FDR was first elected to the office of president in 1932. he then won the 1936 presidential election, and then again in 1940, and then again in 1944.
how complete of an idiot are you? FDR was first elected to the office of president in 1932. he then won the 1936 presidential election, and then again in 1940, and then again in 1944.
Why in the world are people wasting time on this thread?
THis might be the most inane thread I've seen on this Forum.
You have an OP who obviously either failed or ignored his classes in American History, who insists that the election of 1944 never happened, and so many people are trying to convince him otherwise.
This whole thread is ridiculous!
Why in the world are people wasting time on this thread?
THis might be the most inane thread I've seen on this Forum.
You have an OP who obviously either failed or ignored his classes in American History, who insists that the election of 1944 never happened, and so many people are trying to convince him otherwise.
This whole thread is ridiculous!
I expected nothing less from a conspiracy theorist. Seriously, get help.
The guy you fired, he probably already had mental problems to begin with. You don't become crazy overnight like him unless you already suffer from some diagnosable mental issue.
This is proof that there were elections. If you look at the Wiki links, you will see that the Republican candidate actually won several states.
What did you prove? You proved that elections were held and Roosevelt won. We all know that. You can't prove that There is no way to prove that because it happened otherwise. He was re-elected. There is no way to know what he would have done if he had not been elected. No way at all.
MY BAD ... thought you said there was no proof ... hate wearing my weak glasses ...
I just get fed up with liberal stupidity and their consistent lack of researching SIMPLE FACTS ...
impossible to keep track of who is liberal on which forum - I post to way too many!
Generally when someone is referred to as a 'lame duck' it means that s/he cannot be re-elected, in otherwords s/he has served all possible terms of service.
I'm thinking it means something entirely different to you.
Generally when someone is referred to as a 'lame duck' it means that s/he cannot be re-elected, in otherwords s/he has served all possible terms of service.
I'm thinking it means something entirely different to you.
As in there was no way there was going to be leadership change during WW II...
Generally when someone is referred to as a 'lame duck' it means that s/he cannot be re-elected, in otherwords s/he has served all possible terms of service.
I'm thinking it means something entirely different to you.
I'm thinking Digital Duck means "incumbent". Yes, incumbency is a powerful re-election advantage. However, some incumbent presidents have not been re-elected, most recently Daddy Bush.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
