Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The truth is the Democrats don't care about this supposed sexual harassment, just like they never cared about the casualties in the military we incurred in Iraq and Afghanistan.
All the Democrats care about is using these or any other issues as a means to regain power. That way they can continue to grow the government and keep their troughs slopped with government largess at the cost of some successful American's success.
Wrong. Bush and Reagan grew the government more than any Democrat did. Clinton actually balanced the budget.
Yes, but only because I'm old fashioned. I believe in family values, God, virtue, good vs evil, heaven n hell, morals, all that stuff that liberals despise. Pretty much what Herman Cain believes in.
It's what Cain, opportunist that he is, SAYS he believes in. We are meeting the other side of Herman, now.
The thing is, if you did honestly believe in these things you would not be supporting this man who is accused of being a sexual predator. I mean, what he did to that woman was legally prosecutable, not just some workplace flirtation that got out of hand.
It's what Cain, opportunist that he is, SAYS he believes in. We are meeting the other side of Herman, now.
The thing is, if you did honestly believe in these things you would not be supporting this man who is accused of being a sexual predator. I mean, what he did to that woman was legally prosecutable, not just some workplace flirtation that got out of hand.
OMG, he isn't being accused of being a sexual preditor, do you know what a sexual preditor is? Obviously you have no clue. He is being accused sexually harrassing a couple of women, that is very different from being a sexual preditor. Is it right? Of course not, but don't make things up as you go along because you have some reason for detesting the guy...
It's what Cain, opportunist that he is, SAYS he believes in. We are meeting the other side of Herman, now.
The thing is, if you did honestly believe in these things you would not be supporting this man who is accused of being a sexual predator. I mean, what he did to that woman was legally prosecutable, not just some workplace flirtation that got out of hand.
Right... By your logic Clinton should be in jail for actually being a "sexuL predator" (something you apparently have no clue what that is) for 100's of years...
Wrong. Bush and Reagan grew the government more than any Democrat did. Clinton actually balanced the budget.
Right... Who will get to claim ownership of the complete collapse of this country due to Medicare and Social Security? Quit lying to yourself and leave the Dark Side you've aligned yourself with.
OMG, he isn't being accused of being a sexual preditor, do you know what a sexual preditor is? Obviously you have no clue. He is being accused sexually harrassing a couple of women, that is very different from being a sexual preditor. Is it right? Of course not, but don't make things up as you go along because you have some reason for detesting the guy...
Bill Clinton is most definitely a sexual predator and a rapist, there is no question on that. Even the feminists defending him had to insist that a rape over 10 years ago didn't count because they knew he actually did rape Juanita Broderick.
He was so much a sexual predator that very young White House interns were his prey.
Bill Clinton is most definitely a sexual predator and a rapist, there is no question on that. Even the feminists defending him had to insist that a rape over 10 years ago didn't count because they knew he actually did rape Juanita Broderick.
He was so much a sexual predator that very young White House interns were his prey.
So he has never been convicted of these crimes, or even formally charged, yet there is "no question" he committed them?
You know, I'm starting to really wonder as to why people are supporting him. Is it because he can say things about the president that white conservatives cannot? The man is clearly clueless about every aspect of the presidency (maybe except finance) but Perot (remember him?) was actually smarter in that area and the crooked politicians ignored him completely.
Cain and that dipshyte Bachman are endorsing torture but yet neither of them put on a uniform. Uncle Ruckus even had the audacity to pretend like the civil rights movement did not happen in his backyard. Hmmmm, maybe that why they (crazy folks) like him so much. Apparently the good Uncle knows his place and does not make waves
If his interviews and debates are any indication of his performance as President, he could very well be the most ignorant ever. He has "too many thing rattling around in his head" . Poll ratings are dropping like a rock, so I won't spend much more time on him.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
